Re: Autolearn as ham with a positive score.

2018-06-12 Thread Benny Pedersen 

Reio Remma skrev den 2018-06-12 09:34:


X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.32 tagged_above=-3 required=3 tests=[
BAYES_50=0.8, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,
DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1,
NO_DNS_FOR_FROM=1, TXREP=1.719] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no


one of the symbols have tflags nice or tflags learn or combination of 
them

Re: Autolearn as ham with a positive score.

2018-06-12 Thread Reio Remma 
> On 12 Jun 2018, at 17:11, Bill Cole  
> wrote:
> 
>> On 12 Jun 2018, at 3:34, Reio Remma wrote:

>> I just noticed *autolearn=ham* for a message with a positive spam score. Is 
>> that normal?

>> X-Spam-Flag: NO
>> X-Spam-Score: 2.32
>> X-Spam-Level: **
>> X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.32 tagged_above=-3 required=3 tests=[
>> BAYES_50=0.8, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,
>> DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1,
>> NO_DNS_FOR_FROM=1, TXREP=1.719] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
> 
> Your configuration is rather unusual (3 is a VERY low threshold) but that's 
> not why this got autolearned as ham. The score used for autolearn thresholds 
> does not use Bayes or TxRep/AWL scores. Detailscan be found with 'perldoc 
> Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::AutoLearnThreshold'

Thanks, that’s what I was looking for and half suspected. My actual spam 
threshold is 6 (set in amavisd-new).

Autolearn ham threshold was indeed -0.1, lowered it some more now.

Thanks,
Reio

Re: Autolearn as ham with a positive score.

2018-06-12 Thread Bill Cole 

On 12 Jun 2018, at 3:34, Reio Remma wrote:


Hello!

I just noticed *autolearn=ham* for a message with a positive spam 
score. Is that normal?


No, but it is also not especially remarkable. The final operative score 
is not the score that is used to determine autolearning.


bayes_auto_learn_threshold_nonspam is set to a negative figure in the 
SpamAssassin config file.


The fact that it is "a negative figure" is pretty much useless 
information. That it were -0.001 or -20 would be useful information.



X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 2.32
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.32 tagged_above=-3 required=3 tests=[
BAYES_50=0.8, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,
DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1,
NO_DNS_FOR_FROM=1, TXREP=1.719] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no


Your configuration is rather unusual (3 is a VERY low threshold) but 
that's not why this got autolearned as ham. The score used for autolearn 
thresholds does not use Bayes or TxRep/AWL scores. Detailscan be found 
with 'perldoc Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::AutoLearnThreshold'

Autolearn as ham with a positive score.

2018-06-12 Thread Reio Remma 

Hello!

I just noticed *autolearn=ham* for a message with a positive spam score. 
Is that normal?


bayes_auto_learn_threshold_nonspam is set to a negative figure in the 
SpamAssassin config file.


X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 2.32
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.32 tagged_above=-3 required=3 tests=[
BAYES_50=0.8, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,
DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1,
NO_DNS_FOR_FROM=1, TXREP=1.719] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no

Thanks,
Reio