Loren Wilton wrote:
No, I was thinking of multipart/alternative where one of the
alternative streams is nothing but images. That doesn't strike me as
legitimate. Can anyone think of a scenario where images *are* a
legitimate alternative representation of text?
Doesn't really help. The
No, I was thinking of multipart/alternative where one of the
alternative streams is nothing but images. That doesn't strike me as
legitimate. Can anyone think of a scenario where images *are* a
legitimate alternative representation of text?
Doesn't really help. The actual mails have a tiny
On Sat, 24 Jun 2006, Philip Prindeville wrote:
the text and the images. The spammers send multipart/alternative
because they want the text/plain section to confuse the Bayes
filters, since they know it won't be rendered...
It seems to me that right there is the spam sign you should be
John D. Hardin wrote:
On Sat, 24 Jun 2006, Philip Prindeville wrote:
the text and the images. The spammers send multipart/alternative
because they want the text/plain section to confuse the Bayes
filters, since they know it won't be rendered...
It seems to me that right there is the
On Sun, 25 Jun 2006, Philip Prindeville wrote:
John D. Hardin wrote:
On Sat, 24 Jun 2006, Philip Prindeville wrote:
The spammers send multipart/alternative
because they want the text/plain section to confuse the Bayes
filters, since they know it won't be rendered...
It seems to me
On Sun, 25 Jun 2006, John D. Hardin wrote:
On Sun, 25 Jun 2006, Philip Prindeville wrote:
John D. Hardin wrote:
On Sat, 24 Jun 2006, Philip Prindeville wrote:
The spammers send multipart/alternative
because they want the text/plain section to confuse the Bayes
filters, since they
On Sun, 25 Jun 2006, David B Funk wrote:
On Sun, 25 Jun 2006, John D. Hardin wrote:
No, I was thinking of multipart/alternative where one of the
alternative streams is nothing but images. That doesn't strike me as
legitimate. Can anyone think of a scenario where images *are* a
On Sun, Jun 25, 2006 at 12:49:17PM -0600, Philip Prindeville wrote:
No, I was thinking of multipart/alternative where one of the
alternative streams is nothing but images. That doesn't strike me as
legitimate. Can anyone think of a scenario where images *are* a
legitimate alternative
-Original Message-
From: Philip Prindeville [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, June 24, 2006 2:10 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: On bichromatic GIF stock spam
I get a lot of spam that looks like:
http://pastebin.com/729105
on the alsa-devel mailing
Michael Scheidell wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Philip Prindeville [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, June 24, 2006 2:10 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: On bichromatic GIF stock spam
I get a lot of spam that looks like:
http://pastebin.com/729105
on the
If, after excluding black, we find that 100% of the color map is that
nasty pastel pink or pastel lime green (etc) then it's a spam and we
toss it.
Sound reasonable?
I was thinking about this the other day. I think the concept is reasonable,
but as stated doesn't go far enough, and would be
Loren Wilton wrote:
If, after excluding black, we find that 100% of the color map is that
nasty pastel pink or pastel lime green (etc) then it's a spam and we
toss it.
Sound reasonable?
I was thinking about this the other day. I think the concept is reasonable,
but as stated doesn't go
12 matches
Mail list logo
