On 2020-03-24 07:31, KADAM, SIDDHESH wrote:
Anyway of blocking attached spam mail of Corona.
its not a problem if you dont have a bitcoin address, stay safe, only
change email password to be more safe, if the content is right all he
clams is he knows your leaked password
even strong passwo
On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 12:01:46PM +0530, KADAM, SIDDHESH wrote:
> Team,
>
> Anyway of blocking attached spam mail of Corona.
>
it's hitting more than 9 points for me with updated rules.
Most relevant hits are:
1.0 FORGED_SPF_HELONo description available.
0.5 KAM_NUMSUBJECT Subj
I have not seen that tutorial but you don't have mail flowing spam or
otherwise:
temporary failure. Command output: sendmail: fatal: open /etc/postfix/
main.cf: Permission denied
Fix that and try again.
Happy Friday the 13th, KAM
On Fri, Dec 13, 2019, 08:54 bobby wrote:
> I am following this
On Fri, 2009-08-21 at 02:46 -0400, Alex wrote:
> > All scored the same. Can be written as a single rule.
>
> I've spent some time and tried to refine my rules based on your
> advice, guenther. Can I ask you to check them over again and see if
> this is any better, or at least more inclusive?
The
On Fri, 2009-08-21 at 03:00 -0400, MySQL Student wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > mimeheader LOC_CTYP_IMG ((Content-Type =~ /image\/png/) ||
> > (Content-Type =~ /image\/jpg/) || (Content-Type =~ /image\/jpeg/) ||
>
> I thought this passed through my --lint, but I only caught it the
> second time. I was looki
On 20-Aug-2009, at 10:51, Marc Muñoz Salvador wrote:
Following Martin Hepworth's instructions, I've pasted source of two e-
mails:
http://pastebin.ca/1536577
You removed far too many headers for anyone to make a meaningful
comparison.
--
Can I borrow your underpants for 10 minutes?
Hi,
> mimeheader LOC_CTYP_IMG ((Content-Type =~ /image\/png/) ||
> (Content-Type =~ /image\/jpg/) || (Content-Type =~ /image\/jpeg/) ||
I thought this passed through my --lint, but I only caught it the
second time. I was looking around for the (new) right way to do it,
and found this in 80_addit
Hi,
>> mimeheader AS_090508_CTYP_PNG Content-Type =~ /image\/png/
>> mimeheader AS_090508_CTYP_JPG Content-Type =~ /image\/jpg/
>> mimeheader AS_090508_CTYP_JPEG Content-Type =~ /image\/jpeg/
>
> All scored the same. Can be written as a single rule.
I've spent some time and tried to r
On Thu, 20 Aug 2009 20:58:02 -0500
Chris wrote:
> Ran it through sa-learn as spam, spamassassn -r and -t which scored
> much better:
> ...
>
> 5.0 BAYES_99 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 99 to
Unfortunately that's not a good guide to future performance. Most spams
contain a l
On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 12:47 +0200, Marc Muñoz Salvador wrote:
> Hello to every body. Sorry If I'm repeating the subject, but I'm new
> to the list, and I've been searching before about it with no success.
>
> I'm having lot of incoming spam with an attached image which is flag
> styled (as the
On Aug 20, 2009, at 1:07 PM, MySQL Student wrote:
mimeheader AS_090508_CTYP_JPG Content-Type =~ /image\/jpg/
score AS_090508_CTYP_JPG 0.5
describe AS_090508_CTYP_JPG Rule by AS: Content-Type: JPG
This can probably be scored higher than the others. image/jpg isn't
a valid
On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 14:07 -0400, Alex wrote:
> A few of these have slipped through on my systems, but for the most
> part, these rules have worked here:
>
> mimeheader AS_090505_CDIS_INLINE Content-Disposition =~ /inline/
> mimeheader AS_090508_CTYP_PNG Content-Type =~ /image\/png/
> mimeh
Hi,
> Text added to e-mail is a bogus one, never repeated, same as the old styled
> spam mail with attached images. The OCR doesn't detect nothing, I understand
> because of flagged effect. Also, image file name changes, if it have.
A few of these have slipped through on my systems, but for the m
On Thu, 20 Aug 2009, Marc Mu?oz Salvador wrote:
Following Martin Hepworth's instructions, I've pasted source of two e-mails:
http: //pastebin.ca/1536577
http: //pastebin.ca/1536583
The headers on both of those spamples have been severely abridged. You
need to figure out how to get the comple
On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 18:51 +0200, Marc Muñoz Salvador wrote:
> Following Martin Hepworth's instructions, I've pasted source of two
> e-mails:
>
>
The two I looked at in any detail made it obvious the From: address was
forged because it didn't agree with the earliest Received: header: not
even t
Marc Muñoz Salvador wrote:
>
>
> Following Martin Hepworth's instructions, I've pasted source of two e-
> mails:
>
> http://pastebin.ca/1536577
> http://pastebin.ca/1536583
>
D*mn. Your first post included the "lots of price on two columns"-style JPEG
that works well with my settings.
Thos
Hello again. Thanks for your answers.
Following Martin Hepworth's instructions, I've pasted source of two e-
mails:
http://pastebin.ca/1536577
http://pastebin.ca/1536583
Regards,
--
Marc Muñoz ~ http://www.atcubic.com
Tel. 902464246
Fax. 933967266
El 20/08/2009, a las 13:22, Martin Hep
Paul Houselander (SME) wrote:
>
> However it seems to have evolved again and tesseract is not extracting
> any useable words.
>
> Obvisouly to early to tell how effective it is but ill update the list
> of my findings.
>
I have received several of those.
You can get tesseract to recognize
Martin Gregorie wrote:
On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 12:22 +0100, Martin Hepworth wrote:
2009/8/20 Marc Muñoz Salvador
Hello to every body. Sorry If I'm repeating the subject, but
I'm new to the list, and I've been searching before about it
with no success.
I
On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 12:22 +0100, Martin Hepworth wrote:
> 2009/8/20 Marc Muñoz Salvador
> Hello to every body. Sorry If I'm repeating the subject, but
> I'm new to the list, and I've been searching before about it
> with no success.
>
> I'm having lot of
2009/8/20 Marc Muñoz Salvador
> Hello to every body. Sorry If I'm repeating the subject, but I'm new to the
> list, and I've been searching before about it with no success.
>
> I'm having lot of incoming spam with an attached image which is flag styled
> (as the one attached).
>
> Text added to e
san wrote:
> Iam running SA 2.64 and i dont think i can run Fuzzyocrplugin...any other
> ruleset which helps me??
>
As many others have said, an upgrade is definitely in order. A 2 year
old copy of spamassassin just can't keep up, no matter what rulesets you
add to it. A significant portion of
Iam running SA 2.64 and i dont think i can run Fuzzyocrplugin...any other
ruleset which helps me??
YOu can't, and if at all possible you should upgrade so you can. There is
lots of new stuff that will help in quite a lot of cases.
That said, the SARE stock rules will help some, although poss
At 02:00 PM 12/1/2006, you wrote:
Iam running SA 2.64 and i dont think i can run Fuzzyocrplugin...any other
ruleset which helps me??
Spamassassin was released (If my google is correct) 08-05-2004.
More than 2 years ago.
Time to upgrade.
Iam running SA 2.64 and i dont think i can run Fuzzyocrplugin...any other
ruleset which helps me??
Evan Platt wrote:
>
> At 01:45 PM 12/1/2006, you wrote:
>
>>Hi,
>>
>>How to stop this type of mail, am recieving too many mails which has got
>>.gif file which is attached,
>
>
> The FuzzyOCR Pl
At 01:45 PM 12/1/2006, you wrote:
Hi,
How to stop this type of mail, am recieving too many mails which has got
.gif file which is attached,
The FuzzyOCR Plugin.
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/FuzzyOcrPlugin
26 matches
Mail list logo
