On 5/19/2017 1:59 PM, David Jones wrote:
Would it be beneficial to add a local.cf config option to allow SA to
specify a different DNS server rather than what the OS is using in
/etc/resolv.conf?
I believe there is also an idea in bugzilla to specify this on a per RBL
basis. I can't find it
>Would it be beneficial to add a local.cf config option to allow SA to
>specify a different DNS server rather than what the OS is using in
>/etc/resolv.conf?
Nevermind. David Funk just posted about "dns_server" that I wasn't
able to find earlier. Seems like setting that would be the best option
David Jones wrote:
Would it be beneficial to add a local.cf config option to allow SA to
specify a different DNS server rather than what the OS is using in
/etc/resolv.conf?
IIRC it does, and a quick scan of the Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf man page
turned up:
dns_server ip-addr-port
>From: Robert Kudyba
>> Wiki page updated and simplified.
>> https://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/CachingNameserver
>For Fedora, since NetworkMangler (as many are fond to call it) is enabled
>by default it might be worthwhile to mention this comment at, but note that
On Fri, 19 May 2017, John Hardin wrote:
On Thu, 18 May 2017, Rob McEwen wrote:
In many cases, they explain to me that their settings got auto-overwritten
by their hoster - who just HAD to switch their resolv.conf file back to
8.8.8.8
cron. job.
Wouldn't the SA config parameter
On Thu, 18 May 2017, Rob McEwen wrote:
In many cases, they explain to me that their settings got auto-overwritten by
their hoster - who just HAD to switch their resolv.conf file back to 8.8.8.8
cron. job.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
>
> Wiki page updated and simplified.
>
> https://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/CachingNameserver
For Fedora, since NetworkMangler (as many are fond to call it) is enabled
by default it might be worthwhile to mention this comment at, but note that
/etc/resolv.conf will be managed by
From: Matus UHLAR - fantomas
>On 18.05.17 17:05, Robert Kudyba wrote:
>> The link to http://njabl.org/rsync.html is broken at the moment.
>njabl.org is dead four (4) years
>On 18.05.17 14:39, John Hardin wrote:
>>I think this part of the wiki page may not be stressed
On 18.05.17 17:05, Robert Kudyba wrote:
The link to http://njabl.org/rsync.html is broken at the moment.
njabl.org is dead four (4) years
On 18.05.17 14:39, John Hardin wrote:
I think this part of the wiki page may not be stressed stongly enough:
[...]
/* Disable forwarding for DNSBL
On 5/18/2017 5:46 PM, David Jones wrote:
it should be pretty clear now to not use a forwarding DNS server locally and
do not point the server to another DNS server in /etc/resolv.conf.
Thanks David!
Some may be interested to know at least 15% of my entire labor
"overhead" for running
On Thu, 2017-05-18 at 21:46 +, David Jones wrote:
> > From: John Hardin
> > I think this part of the wiki page may not be stressed stongly
> > enough:
> > Non-forwarding
> > If you have a large ISP or are using large public DNS provider(s)
> > it is
> > recommended you
On 18 May 2017, at 17:05, Robert Kudyba wrote:
On May 18, 2017, at 4:41 PM, David Jones wrote:
From: Robert Kudyba
Am 18.05.2017 um 22:30 schrieb Reindl Harald:
"with working dnsmasq" says all - DNSMASQ DON'T DO RECURSION - IT
CAN#T
you are
>From: John Hardin
>I think this part of the wiki page may not be stressed stongly enough:
>Non-forwarding
>If you have a large ISP or are using large public DNS provider(s) it is
>recommended you not forward mail-related DNS traffic through their DNS
>servers (though
On Thu, 18 May 2017, Robert Kudyba wrote:
Am 18.05.2017 um 22:30 schrieb Reindl Harald:
"with working dnsmasq" says all - DNSMASQ DON'T DO RECURSION - IT CAN#T
you are forwarding to some other nameserver and you are not the only one
But the nameserver I’m forwarding to is in our
On May 18, 2017 5:11 PM, "Reindl Harald" wrote:
Am 18.05.2017 um 23:05 schrieb Robert Kudyba:
>
> On May 18, 2017, at 4:41 PM, David Jones djo...@ena.com>> wrote:
>>
>> From: Robert Kudyba >
>>>
>>
>>
> On May 18, 2017, at 4:41 PM, David Jones wrote:
>
>> From: Robert Kudyba
>
>>> Am 18.05.2017 um 22:30 schrieb Reindl Harald:
"with working dnsmasq" says all - DNSMASQ DON'T DO RECURSION - IT CAN#T
you are forwarding to some other nameserver and
>From: Robert Kudyba
>> Am 18.05.2017 um 22:30 schrieb Reindl Harald:
>>> "with working dnsmasq" says all - DNSMASQ DON'T DO RECURSION - IT CAN#T
>>> you are forwarding to some other nameserver and you are not the only one
>But the nameserver I’m forwarding to is in our
>From: Robert Kudyba
>host -tTXT test.uribl.com.multi.uribl.com
>test.uribl.com.multi.uribl.com descriptive text "127.0.0.1 -> Query Refused.
>See
> http://uribl.com/refused.shtml for more information [Your DNS IP:
> 74.125.19.15]"
>Some logs to show dnsmasq in use:
>May
> Am 18.05.2017 um 22:30 schrieb Reindl Harald:
>> "with working dnsmasq" says all - DNSMASQ DON'T DO RECURSION - IT CAN#T
>> you are forwarding to some other nameserver and you are not the only one
But the nameserver I’m forwarding to is in our university.
> /etc/resolv.dnsmasq
> search
19 matches
Mail list logo