Am 16.09.2016 um 19:27 schrieb Joe Quinn:
On 9/16/2016 12:59 PM, li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
...
in case you have postscreen or something else which does proper
rbl-scoring in front of the content-scanners it's no problem because
only a small part of spam attempts are mahing it to SA
may depend
On 9/16/2016 12:59 PM, li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
...
in case you have postscreen or something else which does proper
rbl-scoring in front of the content-scanners it's no problem because
only a small part of spam attempts are mahing it to SA
may depend on the amount of ham which can be also
Am 16.09.2016 um 18:17 schrieb David B Funk:
What do you see in your syslog reports from spamc?
Is it reporting any errors?
Please note the 'max-size' parameter for spamc:
-s max_size, --max-size=max_size
Set the maximum message size which will be sent to spamd -- any
bigger than
Am 16.09.2016 um 14:49 schrieb Maik Linnemann:
So far so good. The concept works like it should with only one
exception: Some mails are not tagged by spamassassin and i dont have a
clue why. Viscerally i would say its about 20% of all mails that arent
tagged by spamassassin
how is SA
