Re: skipping nameserver '0.ns.spamhaus.org' because it is a CNAME

On 2018-03-20 (04:56 MDT), Uwe Schindler wrote: > > why they not simply blocked the Hetzner recursive name servers instead of > everything I would have to assume bad behavior on Hetzner's part. -- 'And stars don't care what you wish, and magic don't make things

Re: skipping nameserver '0.ns.spamhaus.org' because it is a CNAME

Hi Uwe! On Fr, Mär 16, 2018 at 12:18:10 +0100, Uwe Schindler wrote: Did you solve this problem in the meantime? Unfortunately this also Yes, I was contaced by a key account manager of Spamhaus. I got a free datafeed query service key. Maybe you could contact Spamhaus to tell them about

RE: skipping nameserver '0.ns.spamhaus.org' because it is a CNAME

; Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2018 10:59 AM > To: Uwe Schindler <uschind...@apache.org> > Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org; 'Alex Lasoriti' <lasor...@spamteq.com> > Subject: Re: skipping nameserver '0.ns.spamhaus.org' because it is a CNAME > > Hi Uwe! > > On Fr, Mär

RE: skipping nameserver '0.ns.spamhaus.org' because it is a CNAME

Hi Stephan, > I see the problems as well in my postfix logs (I’m a Hetzner custom=r as > well): > warning: dnsblog_query: lookup error for DNS query > 36.142.70.194.zen.spamha=s.org: Host or domain name not found. Name > service error for name=36.142=2E70.194.zen.spamhaus.org type=A: Host not >

Re: skipping nameserver '0.ns.spamhaus.org' because it is a CNAME

Hi Alex! On So, Jan 14, 2018 at 07:30:36 +, Alex Lasoriti wrote: On 2018-01-14 17:20, Ian Zimmerman wrote: I am getting these, too. With other news in the last few weeks, are things falling apart at spamhaus? Not that I am aware of :) The infrastructure keeps consolidating and things

Re: skipping nameserver '0.ns.spamhaus.org' because it is a CNAME

On 2018-01-14 19:30, Alex Lasoriti wrote: > > things falling apart at spamhaus? > > Not that I am aware of :) The infrastructure keeps consolidating > and things are getting stronger and stronger! What other news are you > referring to ? I probably had lodged in my memory (what remains of it)

Re: skipping nameserver '0.ns.spamhaus.org' because it is a CNAME

On Sun, 2018-01-14 at 19:30 +, Alex Lasoriti wrote: > On 2018-01-14 17:20, Ian Zimmerman wrote: > > > > On 2018-01-14 17:07, Per Jessen wrote: > > > > > > > > AFAIK, bind does not accept NS records with CNAMEs, only A or > > > > > > records.  It looks like spamhaus updated their

Re: skipping nameserver '0.ns.spamhaus.org' because it is a CNAME

Thanks Alex. I was just looking for a good contact! Regards, KAM On January 14, 2018 2:30:36 PM EST, Alex Lasoriti wrote: >On 2018-01-14 17:20, Ian Zimmerman wrote: >> On 2018-01-14 17:07, Per Jessen wrote: >> >> > AFAIK, bind does not accept NS records with CNAMEs, only

Re: skipping nameserver '0.ns.spamhaus.org' because it is a CNAME

On 2018-01-14 17:20, Ian Zimmerman wrote: > On 2018-01-14 17:07, Per Jessen wrote: > > > AFAIK, bind does not accept NS records with CNAMEs, only A or > > records. It looks like spamhaus updated their nameserver config and > > added cloudflare by way of CNAME. Hi all, this was a "sunday

Re: skipping nameserver '0.ns.spamhaus.org' because it is a CNAME

On 14 Jan 2018, at 11:07 (-0500), Per Jessen wrote: Chris wrote: I started seeing this yesterday evening - https://pastebin.com/Q01t63uf AFAICT it's happening on every message that is processed by SA. This is: spamassassin -V SpamAssassin version 3.4.1 running on Perl version 5.22.1 Any

Re: skipping nameserver '0.ns.spamhaus.org' because it is a CNAME

On 2018-01-14 17:07, Per Jessen wrote: > AFAIK, bind does not accept NS records with CNAMEs, only A or > records. It looks like spamhaus updated their nameserver config and > added cloudflare by way of CNAME. I am getting these, too. With other news in the last few weeks, are things

Re: skipping nameserver '0.ns.spamhaus.org' because it is a CNAME

Chris wrote: > I started seeing this yesterday evening - > https://pastebin.com/Q01t63uf AFAICT it's happening on every message > that is processed by SA. This is: > > spamassassin -V > SpamAssassin version 3.4.1 > running on Perl version 5.22.1 > > Any ideas? AFAIK, bind does not accept NS

Re: skipping nameserver '0.ns.spamhaus.org' because it is a CNAME

On Sun, 2018-01-14 at 09:07 -0600, Chris wrote: > I started seeing this yesterday evening > - https://pastebin.com/Q01t63uf > I saw the same thing in last night's logwatch report and its being reported in today's 'message' log. According to my logs it started here at Jan 13 22:41:03 and is still