Am 16.09.2016 um 13:41 schrieb Marcus Schopen:
> Hi Robert,
>
> Am Freitag, den 16.09.2016, 13:02 +0200 schrieb Robert Schetterer:
>> Am 16.09.2016 um 12:48 schrieb Marcus Schopen:
>>> Hi Patrick,
>>>
>>> Am Donnerstag, den 15.09.2016, 22:02 -0400 schrieb Patrick Domack:
Sounds like a lot of
I had no reason to backport it, xenial didn't exist when 3.4.1 was
released, and there is no need to backport a package just for a new
source code change, just apply the current package to the new source
code.
Quoting Marcus Schopen :
Hi Patrick,
Am Donnerstag, den
Hi Robert,
Am Freitag, den 16.09.2016, 13:02 +0200 schrieb Robert Schetterer:
> Am 16.09.2016 um 12:48 schrieb Marcus Schopen:
> > Hi Patrick,
> >
> > Am Donnerstag, den 15.09.2016, 22:02 -0400 schrieb Patrick Domack:
> >> Sounds like a lot of work for an old spamassassin version.
> >>
> >>
Am 16.09.2016 um 12:48 schrieb Marcus Schopen:
> Hi Patrick,
>
> Am Donnerstag, den 15.09.2016, 22:02 -0400 schrieb Patrick Domack:
>> Sounds like a lot of work for an old spamassassin version.
>>
>>
Hi Patrick,
Am Donnerstag, den 15.09.2016, 22:02 -0400 schrieb Patrick Domack:
> Sounds like a lot of work for an old spamassassin version.
>
> https://launchpad.net/%7Epatrickdk/+archive/ubuntu/production/+sourcepub/5219815/+listing-archive-extra
H ... do you think better backporting 3.4.1
Sounds like a lot of work for an old spamassassin version.
https://launchpad.net/%7Epatrickdk/+archive/ubuntu/production/+sourcepub/5219815/+listing-archive-extra
Quoting Marcus Schopen :
Hi,
I've backported 3.4.0 from Ubuntu 14.04 TLS for Ubuntu 12.04 LTS (perl
5.14.2),
Hi,
I've backported 3.4.0 from Ubuntu 14.04 TLS for Ubuntu 12.04 LTS (perl
5.14.2), which comes with very old version 3.3.2 (can't upgrade the
complete host right now). Before installing it: is there anything to be
aware of, beside better wiping bayes database and starting fresh? [1]
Ciao
Marcus