Apache tomcat 7.0.82 RFC issue (UNCLASSIFIED)

2017-12-11 Thread Lueders, Paul T CIV USARMY NGIC (US)
CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED I am running Apache tomcat 7.0.82. It is not running behind any other web server. I am getting: Java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Invalid Character found in the request target. The valid characters are defined in RFC 7230 and RFC 3986 How can I correct this in

Re: Apache tomcat 7.0.82 RFC issue (UNCLASSIFIED)

2017-12-11 Thread Coty Sutherland
On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 9:34 AM, Lueders, Paul T CIV USARMY NGIC (US) wrote: > CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED > > I am running Apache tomcat 7.0.82. It is not running behind any other web > server. I am getting: > Java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Invalid Character found in the request > targe

Re: Apache tomcat 7.0.82 RFC issue (UNCLASSIFIED)

2017-12-11 Thread Mark Thomas
On 11 December 2017 14:34:01 GMT+00:00, "Lueders, Paul T CIV USARMY NGIC (US)" wrote: >CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED > >I am running Apache tomcat 7.0.82. It is not running behind any other >web server. I am getting: >Java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Invalid Character found in the >request ta

Re: Get IP address in Realm

2017-12-11 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Mark, On 12/10/17 3:11 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: > On 09/12/17 19:41, Christopher Schultz wrote: > > > >> If there is any appetite for such a thing in Tomcat, I'd be happy >> to propose a change to bring e.g. an AuthenticationListener >> interface w

Re: context resources, replacement parameters

2017-12-11 Thread Chris Cheshire
I thought more about this over the weekend, and realised it is more hassle than it is worth, and not because I don't want to do it. I don't think it is actually feasible now that I think about it more. Given that a JVM has one set of System.properties and one instance of Tomcat can have multiple d

Re: context resources, replacement parameters

2017-12-11 Thread Mark Thomas
On 11/12/17 19:12, Chris Cheshire wrote: > I thought more about this over the weekend, and realised it is more > hassle than it is worth, and not because I don't want to do it. I > don't think it is actually feasible now that I think about it more. > > Given that a JVM has one set of System.proper