We have a mixed JDK environment on our internal Windows Server.
Tomcat is installed using the service installer and its service
configuration points to the JDK 17 as it serves some internal apps requiring
JDK 12+.
JAVA_HOME points to older JDK 8.
PATH variable contains link to JDK 8, but also
JAVA_HOME=c:/...
set CATALINA_HOME=c:/..
set PATH=%JAVA_HOME%/bin;%PATH%
and use only this file to start tomcat. Put there other variables eg.
JAVA_OPTS in case you have some other jvm variables.
Do not rely on MS Windows variables settings.
Regards,
Zdenek Henek
On Mon, Apr 11, 2022 at 1
2022 at 1:50 PM Jan Tosovsky wrote:
> There isn't any sign of the tomcat restart in the tomcat logs. In
> tomcat9-stderr-2022-04-08.log there is just one bootstrap section with
> the path to JDK 17, followed by mesages about the registering webapps.
> Then weekend of silence
On 2013-12-28 David Law wrote:
> On 28/12/2013 19:34, Christopher Schultz wrote:
>
> > What type of data do you have on the disk?
> Its all standard stuff. As specified by W3C, compressed SVG's
> are just SVG's (which are just XML) compressed with gzip, with
> a Mime-Type of "image/svg+xml", and
Dear All,
in my Java webapp I switched to UTF-8 encoded properties files.
I've implemented a custom ResourceBundle
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3645491/i18n-with-utf-8-encoded-propertie
s-files-in-jsf-2-0-appliaction
but my strings are still displayed incorrectly. The original ASCII ones
On 2014-06-02 Jan Tosovsky wrote:
>
> in my Java webapp I switched to UTF-8 encoded properties files.
>
> I've implemented a custom ResourceBundle
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3645491/i18n-with-utf-8-encoded-
> properties-files-in-jsf-2-0-appliaction
>
On 2013-11-20 williamissey...@tsys.com wrote:
> Is there any way to not have the password visible in the realm for
> example for active directory realm?
You can extend the default JNDIRealm:
import org.apache.catalina.realm.JNDIRealm;
import org.slf4j.Logger;
import org.slf4j.LoggerFactory;
publ
Dear All,
there are plenty resources mentioning it is a must to run tomcat as a
dedicated user with limited permissions.
Is it still true when tomcat doesn't run standalone, but via Apache web
server connected via AJP? That webserver already runs in the restrictive
mode.
Thanks, Jan
On 2015-02-26 Christopher Schultz wrote:
> On 2/26/15 5:23 AM, Aurélien Terrestris wrote:
> > I agree with Leon.
>
> As do I. Apache httpd can change the attack surface somewhat, but if
> requests can still come from an untrusted remote client through to the
> application server, then you still ha
On 2015-02-26 Aurélien Terrestris wrote:
>
> It makes me remember this doc which is not bad for securing Tomcat :
> https://www.owasp.org/index.php/Securing_tomcat
>
This is a good one. I've also found this:
http://server.dzone.com/articles/hacking-liferay-%E2%80%93-securing
It would be nice to
Dear All,
I've updated ancient tomcat to 8.0.49 and deployed app now throws '65535
bytes limit' exception for certain JSPs.
Following this (older) thread
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/5484253/jspservice-is-exceeding-the-6553
5-bytes-limit I changed that mappedfile parameter, but it didn't h
Dear All,
I use tomcat as a Liferay portal engine. It is usually stopped in two steps.
There is Shutdown button available in Liferay Control panel, which stops the
webapp. Once this is finished, it is safe to stop tomcat via the standard
shutdown script.
If tomcat is stopped differently:
* tomcat
12 matches
Mail list logo
