21:26 AM
Subject: Re: Binding a non root user to port 443
Chris,
On 15.03.2018 13:34, Cheltenham, Chris wrote:
> Andre,
>
> You probably missed where I had mentioned the infrastructure group poo poo'd
> altering iptables for whatever reason.
>
> Here is what I think are my 5 be
Chris,
On 15.03.2018 13:34, Cheltenham, Chris wrote:
Andre,
You probably missed where I had mentioned the infrastructure group poo poo'd
altering iptables for whatever reason.
Here is what I think are my 5 best choices for running tomcat as a non root
user on a privileged port.
1) redirect 4
Cell # 215-301-6571
-Original Message-
From: André Warnier (tomcat) [mailto:a...@ice-sa.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2018 6:45 PM
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: Re: Binding a non root user to port 443
Hi.
On 14.03.2018 18:21, Cheltenham, Chris wrote:
> Ok , I thank you guys f
ology Services
The School District of Philadelphia
Work # 215-400-5025
Cell # 215-301-6571
-----Original Message-----
From: Olaf Kock [mailto:tom...@olafkock.de]
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2018 11:59 AM
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: Re: Binding a non root user to port 443
On 14.03.2018 1
Work # 215-400-5025
Cell # 215-301-6571
-Original Message-
From: Olaf Kock [mailto:tom...@olafkock.de]
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2018 11:59 AM
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: Re: Binding a non root user to port 443
On 14.03.2018 16:02, Cheltenham, Chris wrote:
> Chris,
>
>
On 14.03.2018 16:02, Cheltenham, Chris wrote:
Chris,
I am kind of lost. I am not sure what you guys are asking.
If I asked the same thing twice its because whatever was sent by someone
else other than you did not work or I cannot use.
well, I'm also lost. It would help to know what didn't wor
Philadelphia
Work # 215-400-5025
Cell # 215-301-6571
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2018 10:31 AM
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: Re: Binding a non root user to port 443
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Chris,
On 3/14/18 10:02 AM, Cheltenham, Chris wrote:
> Oh this thread was long ago and answered by someone else.
You asked the same question on 2018-03-02, and got many replies
including the ones I gave in this thread. Actually, I replied as well.
[mailto:ccheltenham-...@philasd.org]
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2018 10:02 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Binding a non root user to port 443
Hello Coty,
I am not sure what you mean?
===
Thank You;
Chris Cheltenham
Technology Services
The School District of Philadelphia
Work
: Wednesday, March 14, 2018 9:45 AM
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: Re: Binding a non root user to port 443
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Coty,
On 3/13/18 2:20 PM, Coty Sutherland wrote:
> This looks like a continuation of this thread from 11 days ago:
> https://ww
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Coty,
On 3/13/18 2:20 PM, Coty Sutherland wrote:
> This looks like a continuation of this thread from 11 days ago:
> https://www.mail-archive.com/users@tomcat.apache.org/msg128541.html
Indeed.
>
Chris C, you didn't like any of the responses you g
-6571
-Original Message-
From: Hassan Schroeder [mailto:hassan.schroe...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2018 2:40 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Binding a non root user to port 443
On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 11:18 AM, Cheltenham, Chris
wrote:
> I may lobby for iptables
Cheltenham
Technology Services
The School District of Philadelphia
Work # 215-400-5025
Cell # 215-301-6571
-Original Message-
From: Hassan Schroeder [mailto:hassan.schroe...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2018 2:40 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Binding a non root user to port
On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 11:18 AM, Cheltenham, Chris
wrote:
> I may lobby for iptables but the admins are pushing back.
"pushing back" because of laziness or actual reasons?
--
Hassan Schroeder hassan.schroe...@gmail.com
twitter: @hassan
Consulting Availability : Silico
Change your 443 port to something above 443. like 1443 or 8443. Root owns
ports below 1024. Root owner will have to stop/start. and processes using
ports under 1024. Only root user can use.
Peggy
On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 1:26 PM, Cheltenham, Chris <
ccheltenham-...@philasd.org> wrote:
> Hello
gt; From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2018 2:03 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: Binding a non root user to port 443
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Chris,
>
> On 3/13/18 1:26 P
Philadelphia
Work # 215-400-5025
Cell # 215-301-6571
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2018 2:03 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Binding a non root user to port 443
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash
Message-
From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2018 2:03 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Binding a non root user to port 443
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Chris,
On 3/13/18 1:26 PM, Cheltenham, Chris wrote:
> Is ther
...@christopherschultz.net]
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2018 2:03 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Binding a non root user to port 443
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Chris,
On 3/13/18 1:26 PM, Cheltenham, Chris wrote:
> Is there a way to redirect ports 80 and 443 to 8443.
&g
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Chris,
On 3/13/18 1:26 PM, Cheltenham, Chris wrote:
> Is there a way to redirect ports 80 and 443 to 8443.
>
> I have a non root user but I cannot use CentOS firewalld nor
> iptables.
How about authbind?
> I have tried these things.
>
> redirec
Hello Everyone,
Is there a way to redirect ports 80 and 443 to 8443.
I have a non root user but I cannot use CentOS firewalld nor iptables.
I have tried these things.
But it still fails.
===
Thank You;
Chris Cheltenham
Technology Services
The School Di
21 matches
Mail list logo
