By the way, I should mention that with Apache AJP in front of a container,
this kind of partial matching stuff gets really interesting. :-)
Cheers,
Paul
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 11:47 AM, Paul Benedict
wrote:
> Yes, I gave them the same example I used here. They confirmed it is
> "overlapping".
Yes, I gave them the same example I used here. They confirmed it is
"overlapping". Here is the example again:
/context/something <-- context is /context
/context/something/somethingelse <-- context is /context/something
Cheers,
Paul
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 11:34 AM, David kerber wrote:
> On 3/
On 3/22/2016 12:31 PM, Paul Benedict wrote:
Mark, I did get some clarification. Thanks for asking.
The EE spec states an "application" may not have overlapping context roots.
I got clarification that "application" refers only to an EAR. Therefore, an
EE server should be validating this condition
Mark, I did get some clarification. Thanks for asking.
The EE spec states an "application" may not have overlapping context roots.
I got clarification that "application" refers only to an EAR. Therefore, an
EE server should be validating this condition.
So two inferences follow:
1) In the case of
On 22/03/2016 15:57, Paul Benedict wrote:
> FYI, the EE spec lead and Servlet spec lead consulted. They said I should
> log a ticket against the Servlet specification on this matter. That is
> something I think I shall do. I found some wording in the specification
> that should likely have more det
FYI, the EE spec lead and Servlet spec lead consulted. They said I should
log a ticket against the Servlet specification on this matter. That is
something I think I shall do. I found some wording in the specification
that should likely have more detail.
Cheers,
Paul
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 10:49
On 22 March 2016 14:46:31 GMT+00:00, Christopher Schultz
wrote:
>Mark,
>
>On 3/17/16 1:28 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> On 17 March 2016 16:06:10 GMT+00:00, Paul Benedict
> wrote:
>>> This question is not about Tomcat per se, but it does affect it.
>It's
>>> really about the EE specification in regar
Mark,
On 3/17/16 1:28 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 17 March 2016 16:06:10 GMT+00:00, Paul Benedict
> wrote:
>> This question is not about Tomcat per se, but it does affect it. It's
>> really about the EE specification in regards to any servlet container.
>> I'd
>> like to get professional opinion
On 17 March 2016 16:06:10 GMT+00:00, Paul Benedict wrote:
>This question is not about Tomcat per se, but it does affect it. It's
>really about the EE specification in regards to any servlet container.
>I'd
>like to get professional opinions on this part of the specification.
>
>I am quoting from E
