Re: 9.0.70 / 9.0.71 regression?

2023-03-04 Thread Dan Armbrust

Thanks for updating - sorry I didn't get a chance to run it down more.

I should be able to do a test in our SSO enabled env this next week with 9.0.73.

Dan

On 2/27/23 4:06 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:

Looks like this is the issue:

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66488

That you only see the problem when using the SSO layer is consistent with our 
understanding of that bug.


Mark


On 16/02/2023 08:37, Mark Thomas wrote:

On 16/02/2023 00:42, Dan Armbrust wrote:
Are there any known regressions / open issues with 9.0.70 or 9.0.71 that could cause 
something like the below?


The closest I can think of is this:
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66388

but it is fixed in 9.0.71 and I'd expect it to impact resource lookup (i.e.finding 
files on disk) but not the request URI since the URL class isn't used got processing 
the request URI.


It would be good to track this down ASAP as we are about to start the next round of 
releases.


Mark




We encountered a very odd issue today, where after upgrading the version of 
spring-boot for one of our rest microservices (and getting a newer tomcat) it stopped 
processing our calls properly.


But only when it was deployed in an env where the requests were going thru a SSO 
authentication layer first, and having a number of extra headers added to the request.


When we tested locally, in an env without the SSO filtering, we didn't see the 
issue.

It was a very odd problem, it presented to the end user as simply getting 404 errors 
back from the service.


Tomcat was indeed sending 404 errors - but our integrated monitoring (datadog) was not 
even showing us the proper requests coming in - instead, each request that arrived 
came across with some partial (random) URL, which then didn't match any of our 
services, and was sent back as a 404.


We haven't yet done any further debugging about where in the tomcat stack the request 
was being completely corrupted.  I also haven't isolated if it was 9.0.71 or 9.0.70 - 
9.0.69 works, and 9.0.71 fails.


Thanks,

Dan 



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org



Re: 9.0.70 / 9.0.71 regression?

2023-02-27 Thread Mark Thomas

Looks like this is the issue:

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66488

That you only see the problem when using the SSO layer is consistent 
with our understanding of that bug.


Mark


On 16/02/2023 08:37, Mark Thomas wrote:

On 16/02/2023 00:42, Dan Armbrust wrote:
Are there any known regressions / open issues with 9.0.70 or 9.0.71 
that could cause something like the below?


The closest I can think of is this:
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66388

but it is fixed in 9.0.71 and I'd expect it to impact resource lookup 
(i.e.finding files on disk) but not the request URI since the URL class 
isn't used got processing the request URI.


It would be good to track this down ASAP as we are about to start the 
next round of releases.


Mark




We encountered a very odd issue today, where after upgrading the 
version of spring-boot for one of our rest microservices (and getting 
a newer tomcat) it stopped processing our calls properly.


But only when it was deployed in an env where the requests were going 
thru a SSO authentication layer first, and having a number of extra 
headers added to the request.


When we tested locally, in an env without the SSO filtering, we didn't 
see the issue.


It was a very odd problem, it presented to the end user as simply 
getting 404 errors back from the service.


Tomcat was indeed sending 404 errors - but our integrated monitoring 
(datadog) was not even showing us the proper requests coming in - 
instead, each request that arrived came across with some partial 
(random) URL, which then didn't match any of our services, and was 
sent back as a 404.


We haven't yet done any further debugging about where in the tomcat 
stack the request was being completely corrupted.  I also haven't 
isolated if it was 9.0.71 or 9.0.70 - 9.0.69 works, and 9.0.71 fails.


Thanks,

Dan


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org



Re: 9.0.70 / 9.0.71 regression?

2023-02-16 Thread Mark Thomas

On 16/02/2023 00:42, Dan Armbrust wrote:
Are there any known regressions / open issues with 9.0.70 or 9.0.71 that 
could cause something like the below?


The closest I can think of is this:
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66388

but it is fixed in 9.0.71 and I'd expect it to impact resource lookup 
(i.e.finding files on disk) but not the request URI since the URL class 
isn't used got processing the request URI.


It would be good to track this down ASAP as we are about to start the 
next round of releases.


Mark




We encountered a very odd issue today, where after upgrading the version 
of spring-boot for one of our rest microservices (and getting a newer 
tomcat) it stopped processing our calls properly.


But only when it was deployed in an env where the requests were going 
thru a SSO authentication layer first, and having a number of extra 
headers added to the request.


When we tested locally, in an env without the SSO filtering, we didn't 
see the issue.


It was a very odd problem, it presented to the end user as simply 
getting 404 errors back from the service.


Tomcat was indeed sending 404 errors - but our integrated monitoring 
(datadog) was not even showing us the proper requests coming in - 
instead, each request that arrived came across with some partial 
(random) URL, which then didn't match any of our services, and was sent 
back as a 404.


We haven't yet done any further debugging about where in the tomcat 
stack the request was being completely corrupted.  I also haven't 
isolated if it was 9.0.71 or 9.0.70 - 9.0.69 works, and 9.0.71 fails.


Thanks,

Dan


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org