On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 10:24 AM, Christopher Schultz
ch...@christopherschultz.net wrote:
Now, as Chris pointed out - it would be great to design your app
that it saves the intermediate work to a database or some secondary
store that can be retrieved upon login again. Think shopping
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Neven,
On 1/28/14, 8:59 PM, Neven Cvetkovic wrote:
Ultimately, session stickiness works great to handle load
balancing (workload management), but it is not enough for session
failover.
Correct: session stickiness just avoids the problem of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Raquib,
On 1/28/14, 10:03 AM, Raquib Hasan wrote:
I am creating a tomcat cluster following helps I found online. My
question is, do I have to use the Apache(mod_jk) for session
replication?
No.
Is it possible to use F5 load balancer
Thanks Chris.
I am not sure whether the sticky session is needed or not. The session
replication also may not be needed. My requirement is very simple. There
are 2 back end servers. I want both gets same user communication at the
same time, so that, if one server fails the other can continue. I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Raquib,
On 1/28/14, 12:29 PM, Raquib Hasan wrote:
I am not sure whether the sticky session is needed or not. The
session replication also may not be needed. My requirement is very
simple.
If you don't need anything fancy, may I suggest that you
Chris,
Do you mean, if just the sticky session is used, tomcat clustering won't be
needed?
Thanks,
Raquib Hasan
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 12:37 PM, Christopher Schultz
ch...@christopherschultz.net wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Raquib,
On 1/28/14, 12:29 PM,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Raquib,
On 1/28/14, 3:18 PM, Raquib Hasan wrote:
Do you mean, if just the sticky session is used, tomcat clustering
won't be needed?
In some ways, yes, it is that simple.
In other ways it is not.
If you use sticky-sessions without clustering,
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 3:42 PM, Christopher Schultz
ch...@christopherschultz.net wrote:
Thus I will probably never have to use clustering.
Loving your responses on this topic, Chris. I do not want to hijack this
thread, but i find this topic interesting, and your responses make it more
Thanks Chris .. now I got a clear picture.
First off I will try without cluster. If that does not work, I will go for
clustering.
Regards.
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 3:42 PM, Christopher Schultz
ch...@christopherschultz.net wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Raquib,
On
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 3:54 PM, Howard W. Smith, Jr.
smithh032...@gmail.com wrote:
Thus I will probably never have to use clustering.
Loving your responses on this topic, Chris. I do not want to hijack this
thread, but i find this topic interesting, and your responses make it more
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 8:59 PM, Neven Cvetkovic
neven.cvetko...@gmail.comwrote:
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 3:54 PM, Howard W. Smith, Jr.
smithh032...@gmail.com wrote:
Thus I will probably never have to use clustering.
Loving your responses on this topic, Chris. I do not want to hijack
11 matches
Mail list logo
