-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Robert,
On 9/2/2009 6:15 AM, Robert Whane wrote:
The way I now understand this
element to work is that it's some sort of hint to the container
processing the deployment descriptor that it should go looking for a
magical (vendor specific) mapping
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 1:22 AM, Martin Gaintymgai...@hotmail.com wrote:
the fellow who wrote it was writing code for at least 2 other projects
it may have been a case of where he accomplished 75% of what was needed then
some other task got moved to his front burner
I hear you, we've all been
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Robert,
On 8/31/2009 6:19 PM, Robert Whane wrote:
Okay, it's optional, so I don't HAVE to use, but if I DO use it, what
possible advantage does it have?
Adherence to the Servlet Specification?
- -chris
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 5:41 PM, Christopher
Schultzch...@christopherschultz.net wrote:
On 8/31/2009 6:19 PM, Robert Whane wrote:
Okay, it's optional, so I don't HAVE to use, but if I DO use it, what
possible advantage does it have?
Adherence to the Servlet Specification?
Which is what I
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 5:07 AM, Martin Gaintymgai...@hotmail.com wrote:
both the entries ContextResource and web.xml resource-ref reference
ContextResource
//WebAnnotationSet.java
protected static void addResource(Context context, Resource annotation)
{
//if the annotation is
Subject: Re: Is resource-ref really needed?
From: robert.wh...@gmail.com
To: mgai...@hotmail.com; users@tomcat.apache.org
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 5:07 AM, Martin Gaintymgai...@hotmail.com wrote:
both the entries ContextResource and web.xml resource-ref reference
ContextResource
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 2:27 AM, Martin Gaintymgai...@hotmail.com wrote:
you can enter a documentation change to correct either
1)duplicate behaviour of ApplicationContext.xml Resource by web.xml
resource-ref
2)or make the documentation a bit clearer on what is required and what is
optional
Robert Whane schrieb:
There has to be some use of that resource-ref element. All the Tomcat
examples and tutorials instruct you to create this element. Someone
really badly wants you to use it, yet it seemingly has not function
whatsoever. Something just doesn't add up, or maybe it's just me...
@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: Re: Is resource-ref really needed?
Robert Whane schrieb:
There has to be some use of that resource-ref element. All the Tomcat
examples and tutorials instruct you to create this element. Someone
really badly wants you to use it, yet it seemingly has
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 1:50 PM, Martin Gaintymgai...@hotmail.com wrote:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47769
That's a very good start. Thanks!
There is however still one vital piece of information missing in the
proposed documentation update. It now clearly states that
mandatory: define the attributes in ContextResource in
applicationContext.xml
OR
optionally define the resource attributes resource-env-ref or resource-ref
in web.xml
http://proteinbank.vbi.vt.edu/tomcat-docs/config/context.html#Resource%20Definitions
Martin Gainty
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 1:12 AM, Martin Gaintymgai...@hotmail.com wrote:
mandatory: define the attributes in ContextResource in
applicationContext.xml
OR
optionally define the resource attributes resource-env-ref or
resource-ref in web.xml
obligatoire. Étant donné que les email peuvent facilement
être sujets à la manipulation, nous ne pouvons accepter aucune responsabilité
pour le contenu fourni.
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 01:36:47 +0200
Subject: Re: Is resource-ref really needed?
From: robert.wh...@gmail.com
To: users
13 matches
Mail list logo