Thank you so much i have it working now i had to change the httpd.com from
JkMount /Hello/*loadbalancer1
To
JkMount /Hello*workspace1
On Jan 12, 2014 9:31 PM, "侯树成" wrote:
> Hi, Alex
> What is your mod_jk.conf file that used for mod_jk configuration.
>
> You can config it as blow:
> LoadM
Hi, Alex
What is your mod_jk.conf file that used for mod_jk configuration.
You can config it as blow:
LoadModule jk_module modules/mod_jk.so
JkWorkersFile "conf/workers.properties"
JkLogFile "logs/mod_jk.log"
JkLogLevel error
JkLogStampFormat "[%a %b %d %H:%M:%S %Y]"
JkOptions +ForwardKeySize +Fo
On 1/10/2014 2:53 PM, Alex Lucard wrote:
.
On Jan 10, 2014 5:00 PM, "Alex Lucard" wrote:
I am running CentOS 6.5 and tomcat 7
I cannot get the mod_jk to work
I have a JSP page on this server and if you go to localhost:8080/Hello it
will work but if I just go to localhost/Hello The requested UR
also solves your problem
+JkDisableReuse
in httpd.conf
Filip
Rainer Jung wrote:
André Vila Cova wrote:
Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS release 4 (Nahant Update 5)
Release : Jakarta-Tomcat 5.5.20
Modulo nativo APR: tomcat-connectors-1.2.20
JVM versão. : Sun JVM1.5.0_11
I th
André Vila Cova wrote:
Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS release 4 (Nahant Update 5)
Release : Jakarta-Tomcat 5.5.20
Modulo nativo APR: tomcat-connectors-1.2.20
JVM versão. : Sun JVM1.5.0_11
I think that apache web server don't receive response from tomcat and don't
send final ack
Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS release 4 (Nahant Update 5)
Release : Jakarta-Tomcat 5.5.20
Modulo nativo APR: tomcat-connectors-1.2.20
JVM versão. : Sun JVM1.5.0_11
I think that apache web server don't receive response from tomcat and don't
send final ack to tomcat and tomcat do
Hi,
you didn't give us your versions, you platform or any configuration info.
André Vila Cova wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Apache mod_jk returns following error (frequently...):
>
> [Thu Jul 26 11:07:52 2007] [2703:1120] [error]
> ajp_connection_tcp_get_message::jk_ajp_common.c (948): (app02_aol) can't
>
One obvious thing that confuses me and could be changed is the "Advanced
worker directives" table. It includes directives that are applicable to
both load balancer workers and real workers and only distinguishes which
directives are used for which worker when it is to be used for a load
balancer
On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 22:40 +0200, Rainer Jung wrote:
> Scott McClanahan wrote:
> > Thanks, so much! I'd like to continue this thread a bit more because of
> > helpful I think it will be for everyone using mod_jk.
> >
> >> That one, reply_timeout, is not really meant for high speed detection.
> >
Scott McClanahan wrote:
Thanks, so much! I'd like to continue this thread a bit more because of
helpful I think it will be for everyone using mod_jk.
That one, reply_timeout, is not really meant for high speed detection.
Usually you've got an ap, that every now and then needs 10 or 20 seconds
Thanks, so much! I'd like to continue this thread a bit more because of
helpful I think it will be for everyone using mod_jk.
On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 22:00 +0200, Rainer Jung wrote:
> Hi Scott,
>
> > I thoroughly enjoyed the updated docs. It is just what I needed. I
> > just want to mention a few
Hi Scott,
I thoroughly enjoyed the updated docs. It is just what I needed. I
just want to mention a few inferences I have now from reading it.
Thanks.
In a load balanced setup using connect_timeout and prepost_timeout, this
will protect me from sending either newly established connections
On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 17:00 +0200, Rainer Jung wrote:
> Hi,
>
> good questions. First of all: I just today wrote a new docs page about
> timeouts. We are soon releasing 1.2.24 which contains this page. You can
> already look at it under
>
> http://people.apache.org/~rjung/mod_jk-dev/docs/
>
>
On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 17:00 +0200, Rainer Jung wrote:
> Hi,
>
> good questions. First of all: I just today wrote a new docs page about
> timeouts. We are soon releasing 1.2.24 which contains this page. You can
> already look at it under
>
> http://people.apache.org/~rjung/mod_jk-dev/docs/
>
>
Hi,
good questions. First of all: I just today wrote a new docs page about
timeouts. We are soon releasing 1.2.24 which contains this page. You can
already look at it under
http://people.apache.org/~rjung/mod_jk-dev/docs/
(The new page is named "Timeouts" and part of the group Generic Howtos
Hi.
Thanks for answering me.
On 1/23/07, Rainer Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
heind heind schrieb:
> Hi,
>
> I have a web application deployed in tomcat embedded in jonas 4.7.4
> Application Server, and in frontend there are apache 2.0.55 and mod_jk
> 12.20.
>
> My issue is that the
Hi,
heind heind schrieb:
> Hi,
>
> I have a web application deployed in tomcat embedded in jonas 4.7.4
> Application Server, and in frontend there are apache 2.0.55 and mod_jk
> 12.20.
>
> My issue is that the message below is generated systematically after every
> jsp call although the jsp ar
Hi Mladen,
I'll upgrade to the latest mod_jk. I do have a timeout set as follows:
Then in my workers.properties we have:
worker.tomcat.socket_timeout=60
Does that look OK?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/mod_jk-error-log-t1519311.html#a4126407
Sent from the Tomcat
Todd Huss wrote:
On all of our webservers from development (doing 1 page view every few
minutes) to production (doing 500 page views per minute) we're seeing
these error messages in the mod_jk log:
[Thu Apr 20 17:57:45 2006] [jk_ajp_common.c (783)]: ERROR: can't receive
the response message f
I don't know, how correct it is, but the following table looks helpful:
http://www.ioplex.com/~miallen/errcmp.html
It says, that 60 is a time out (ETIMEDOUT) on FreeBSD 5.2.1, OSX 10.3.8
and OSF1.
Rainer Jung wrote:
In case of an error this line will print errno as a negative number.
More p
In case of an error this line will print errno as a negative number.
More precisely:
#if defined(WIN32) || (defined(NETWARE) && defined(__NOVELL_LIBC__))
...
errno = WSAGetLastError() - WSABASEERR;
...
#endif
...
do some read from network
...
return (errno > 0) ? -err
1. What does the 449 and 461 numbers mean?
A: My guess would be line numbers
2. Is there a security hole in our server?
A: What is your setup like, do you have an apache in front of an apache?
Peters Jan wrote:
Hi all,
I would like to ask the list if someone can give me a hint, what might
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
1. What does the 449 and 461 numbers mean? A: My guess would be line
numbers
Sure those are line numbers, but for [debug] those
are not errors :)
As well as for [info] and [warn].
Anyhow the format is:
[DATE] [PID:ThreadID] [LEVEL] sourcefile (line number): log
23 matches
Mail list logo
