Re: Mod_jk error

2014-01-13 Thread Alex Lucard
Thank you so much i have it working now i had to change the httpd.com from JkMount /Hello/*loadbalancer1 To JkMount /Hello*workspace1 On Jan 12, 2014 9:31 PM, 侯树成 chain...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Alex What is your mod_jk.conf file that used for mod_jk configuration. You can config it as

Re: Mod_jk error

2014-01-12 Thread 侯树成
Hi, Alex What is your mod_jk.conf file that used for mod_jk configuration. You can config it as blow: LoadModule jk_module modules/mod_jk.so JkWorkersFile conf/workers.properties JkLogFile logs/mod_jk.log JkLogLevel error JkLogStampFormat [%a %b %d %H:%M:%S %Y] JkOptions +ForwardKeySize

Re: Mod_jk error

2014-01-10 Thread Mark Eggers
On 1/10/2014 2:53 PM, Alex Lucard wrote: . On Jan 10, 2014 5:00 PM, Alex Lucard priest.luc...@gmail.com wrote: I am running CentOS 6.5 and tomcat 7 I cannot get the mod_jk to work I have a JSP page on this server and if you go to localhost:8080/Hello it will work but if I just go to

Re: Mod_jk error

2007-07-26 Thread Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
also solves your problem +JkDisableReuse in httpd.conf Filip Rainer Jung wrote: André Vila Cova wrote: Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS release 4 (Nahant Update 5) Release : Jakarta-Tomcat 5.5.20 Modulo nativo APR: tomcat-connectors-1.2.20 JVM versão. : Sun JVM1.5.0_11 I

Re: Mod_jk error

2007-07-26 Thread Rainer Jung
André Vila Cova wrote: Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS release 4 (Nahant Update 5) Release : Jakarta-Tomcat 5.5.20 Modulo nativo APR: tomcat-connectors-1.2.20 JVM versão. : Sun JVM1.5.0_11 I think that apache web server don't receive response from tomcat and don't send final

Re: Mod_jk error

2007-07-26 Thread André Vila Cova
Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS release 4 (Nahant Update 5) Release : Jakarta-Tomcat 5.5.20 Modulo nativo APR: tomcat-connectors-1.2.20 JVM versão. : Sun JVM1.5.0_11 I think that apache web server don't receive response from tomcat and don't send final ack to tomcat and tomcat

Re: Mod_jk error

2007-07-26 Thread Rainer Jung
Hi, you didn't give us your versions, you platform or any configuration info. André Vila Cova wrote: Hello! Apache mod_jk returns following error (frequently...): [Thu Jul 26 11:07:52 2007] [2703:1120] [error] ajp_connection_tcp_get_message::jk_ajp_common.c (948): (app02_aol) can't

Re: mod_jk error detection

2007-07-25 Thread Rainer Jung
Hi, good questions. First of all: I just today wrote a new docs page about timeouts. We are soon releasing 1.2.24 which contains this page. You can already look at it under http://people.apache.org/~rjung/mod_jk-dev/docs/ (The new page is named Timeouts and part of the group Generic Howtos.

Re: mod_jk error detection

2007-07-25 Thread Scott McClanahan
On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 17:00 +0200, Rainer Jung wrote: Hi, good questions. First of all: I just today wrote a new docs page about timeouts. We are soon releasing 1.2.24 which contains this page. You can already look at it under http://people.apache.org/~rjung/mod_jk-dev/docs/ (The new

Re: mod_jk error detection

2007-07-25 Thread Rainer Jung
Hi Scott, I thoroughly enjoyed the updated docs. It is just what I needed. I just want to mention a few inferences I have now from reading it. Thanks. In a load balanced setup using connect_timeout and prepost_timeout, this will protect me from sending either newly established connections

Re: mod_jk error detection

2007-07-25 Thread Scott McClanahan
Thanks, so much! I'd like to continue this thread a bit more because of helpful I think it will be for everyone using mod_jk. On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 22:00 +0200, Rainer Jung wrote: Hi Scott, I thoroughly enjoyed the updated docs. It is just what I needed. I just want to mention a few

Re: mod_jk error detection

2007-07-25 Thread Scott McClanahan
On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 22:40 +0200, Rainer Jung wrote: Scott McClanahan wrote: Thanks, so much! I'd like to continue this thread a bit more because of helpful I think it will be for everyone using mod_jk. That one, reply_timeout, is not really meant for high speed detection. Usually

Re: mod_jk error detection

2007-07-25 Thread Rainer Jung
One obvious thing that confuses me and could be changed is the Advanced worker directives table. It includes directives that are applicable to both load balancer workers and real workers and only distinguishes which directives are used for which worker when it is to be used for a load balancer

Re: mod_jk error detection

2007-07-25 Thread Rainer Jung
Scott McClanahan wrote: Thanks, so much! I'd like to continue this thread a bit more because of helpful I think it will be for everyone using mod_jk. That one, reply_timeout, is not really meant for high speed detection. Usually you've got an ap, that every now and then needs 10 or 20 seconds

Re: mod_jk error detection

2007-07-25 Thread Scott McClanahan
On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 17:00 +0200, Rainer Jung wrote: Hi, good questions. First of all: I just today wrote a new docs page about timeouts. We are soon releasing 1.2.24 which contains this page. You can already look at it under http://people.apache.org/~rjung/mod_jk-dev/docs/ (The

Re: mod_jk : error sending request. Will try another pooled connection

2007-01-24 Thread heind heind
Hi. Thanks for answering me. On 1/23/07, Rainer Jung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, heind heind schrieb: Hi, I have a web application deployed in tomcat embedded in jonas 4.7.4 Application Server, and in frontend there are apache 2.0.55 and mod_jk 12.20. My issue is that the message

Re: mod_jk error log

2006-04-27 Thread Mladen Turk
Todd Huss wrote: On all of our webservers from development (doing 1 page view every few minutes) to production (doing 500 page views per minute) we're seeing these error messages in the mod_jk log: [Thu Apr 20 17:57:45 2006] [jk_ajp_common.c (783)]: ERROR: can't receive the response message

Re: mod_jk error log

2006-04-27 Thread thuss2
Hi Mladen, I'll upgrade to the latest mod_jk. I do have a timeout set as follows: Connector port=8009 connectionTimeout=2 maxThreads=500 minSpareThreads=5 maxSpareThreads=75 enableLookups=false redirectPort=8443 debug=0 protocol=AJP/1.3 /

Re: mod_jk error -60

2006-03-29 Thread Rainer Jung
In case of an error this line will print errno as a negative number. More precisely: #if defined(WIN32) || (defined(NETWARE) defined(__NOVELL_LIBC__)) ... errno = WSAGetLastError() - WSABASEERR; ... #endif ... do some read from network ... return (errno 0) ? -errno

Re: mod_jk error -60

2006-03-29 Thread Rainer Jung
I don't know, how correct it is, but the following table looks helpful: http://www.ioplex.com/~miallen/errcmp.html It says, that 60 is a time out (ETIMEDOUT) on FreeBSD 5.2.1, OSX 10.3.8 and OSF1. Rainer Jung wrote: In case of an error this line will print errno as a negative number. More

Re: mod_jk error numbers

2006-02-16 Thread Mladen Turk
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: 1. What does the 449 and 461 numbers mean? A: My guess would be line numbers Sure those are line numbers, but for [debug] those are not errors :) As well as for [info] and [warn]. Anyhow the format is: [DATE] [PID:ThreadID] [LEVEL] sourcefile (line number):