RE: Version Question

[jonmcalexander]

Thank You!


Dream * Excel * Explore * Inspire
Jon McAlexander
Asst Vice President

Middleware Product Engineering
Enterprise CIO | Platform Services | Middleware | Infrastructure Solutions

Upcoming PTO: 11/8, 11/11, 11/15, 11/22, 11/28, 11/29, 12/2, 12/6, 12/13, 12/20 
– 12/31

8080 Cobblestone Rd | Urbandale, IA 50322
MAC: F4469-010
Tel 515-988-2508 | Cell 515-988-2508

jonmcalexan...@wellsfargo.com


This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are 
not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the addressee, you must not 
use, copy, disclose, or take any action based on this message or any 
information herein. If you have received this message in error, please advise 
the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this message. Thank you for 
your cooperation.


-Original Message-
From: Martin Grigorov  
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2020 9:43 PM
To: Tomcat Users List 
Subject: Re: Version Question

Hi,

On Sat, Mar 21, 2020, 00:37  wrote:

> Good afternoon Mark and group.
>
> There is a question as to WHAT are the correct versions released. Are 
> these 7.0.103, 8.5.53, and 9.0.33 as shown on tomcat.apache.org, OR is 
> it 7.0.104, 8.5.54 and 9.0.34 as shown on ci.apache.org?
>

The first.
CI lists the currently developed versions.

Martin


> Thank you,
>
>
> Dream * Excel * Explore * Inspire
> Jon McAlexander
> Asst Vice President
>
> Middleware Product Engineering
> Enterprise CIO | Platform Services | Middleware | Infrastructure 
> Solutions
>
> Upcoming PTO: 11/8, 11/11, 11/15, 11/22, 11/28, 11/29, 12/2, 12/6, 
> 12/13,
> 12/20 - 12/31
>
> 8080 Cobblestone Rd | Urbandale, IA 50322
> MAC: F4469-010
> Tel 515-988-2508 | Cell 515-988-2508
>
> jonmcalexan...@wellsfargo.com<mailto:jonmcalexan...@wellsfargo.com>
>
>
> This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. 
> If you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the 
> addressee, you must not use, copy, disclose, or take any action based 
> on this message or any information herein. If you have received this 
> message in error, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail 
> and delete this message. Thank you for your cooperation.
>
>

Re: Version Question

[Martin Grigorov]

Hi,

On Sat, Mar 21, 2020, 00:37  wrote:

> Good afternoon Mark and group.
>
> There is a question as to WHAT are the correct versions released. Are
> these 7.0.103, 8.5.53, and 9.0.33 as shown on tomcat.apache.org, OR is it
> 7.0.104, 8.5.54 and 9.0.34 as shown on ci.apache.org?
>

The first.
CI lists the currently developed versions.

Martin


> Thank you,
>
>
> Dream * Excel * Explore * Inspire
> Jon McAlexander
> Asst Vice President
>
> Middleware Product Engineering
> Enterprise CIO | Platform Services | Middleware | Infrastructure Solutions
>
> Upcoming PTO: 11/8, 11/11, 11/15, 11/22, 11/28, 11/29, 12/2, 12/6, 12/13,
> 12/20 - 12/31
>
> 8080 Cobblestone Rd | Urbandale, IA 50322
> MAC: F4469-010
> Tel 515-988-2508 | Cell 515-988-2508
>
> jonmcalexan...@wellsfargo.com
>
>
> This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If
> you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the addressee,
> you must not use, copy, disclose, or take any action based on this message
> or any information herein. If you have received this message in error,
> please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this
> message. Thank you for your cooperation.
>
>

Version Question

[jonmcalexander]

Good afternoon Mark and group.

There is a question as to WHAT are the correct versions released. Are these 
7.0.103, 8.5.53, and 9.0.33 as shown on tomcat.apache.org, OR is it 7.0.104, 
8.5.54 and 9.0.34 as shown on ci.apache.org?

Thank you,


Dream * Excel * Explore * Inspire
Jon McAlexander
Asst Vice President

Middleware Product Engineering
Enterprise CIO | Platform Services | Middleware | Infrastructure Solutions

Upcoming PTO: 11/8, 11/11, 11/15, 11/22, 11/28, 11/29, 12/2, 12/6, 12/13, 12/20 
- 12/31

8080 Cobblestone Rd | Urbandale, IA 50322
MAC: F4469-010
Tel 515-988-2508 | Cell 515-988-2508

jonmcalexan...@wellsfargo.com


This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are 
not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the addressee, you must not 
use, copy, disclose, or take any action based on this message or any 
information herein. If you have received this message in error, please advise 
the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this message. Thank you for 
your cooperation.

Re: tomcat version question

[Konstantin Kolinko]

2018-01-26 1:03 GMT+03:00 Robert J. Carr :
> Hello.
>
> There is a "which version" page on the main site which is really useful,
> and it lists all the versions of the various specs related to the version
> of tomcat, but a really important one IMO that is missing is the Java EE
> version, so I can look up the api docs.
>
> Is there a reason why this is omitted?  Currently, I have to look up the
> servlet spec, and then cross reference that with the Java EE to find the
> appropriate docs.
>
> Or am I missing something?

Have you seen the Specifications page in the Wiki?
https://wiki.apache.org/tomcat/Specifications

I updated the whichversion page with a link to there (r1822243).

Best regards,
Konstantin Kolinko

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org

Re: tomcat version question

[Mark Thomas]

On 25/01/18 22:03, Robert J. Carr wrote:
> Hello.
> 
> There is a "which version" page on the main site which is really useful,
> and it lists all the versions of the various specs related to the version
> of tomcat, but a really important one IMO that is missing is the Java EE
> version, so I can look up the api docs.
> 
> Is there a reason why this is omitted?  Currently, I have to look up the
> servlet spec, and then cross reference that with the Java EE to find the
> appropriate docs.
> 
> Or am I missing something?

Minimum Java version == Java EE version (at least for Tomcat 7.x, 8.x
and 9.x).

Tomcat doesn't implement the full Java EE spec so I'd be cautious about
listing it in case it causes confusion. If we can find the right wording
to use I wouldn't have any objection to adding a Java EE column.

What will happen now Java EE is moving to Eclipse is a whole other issue...

Mark

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org

tomcat version question

[Robert J. Carr]

Hello.

There is a "which version" page on the main site which is really useful,
and it lists all the versions of the various specs related to the version
of tomcat, but a really important one IMO that is missing is the Java EE
version, so I can look up the api docs.

Is there a reason why this is omitted?  Currently, I have to look up the
servlet spec, and then cross reference that with the Java EE to find the
appropriate docs.

Or am I missing something?

Thanks-
Robert

RE: Minimum Java Version question

[Caldarale, Charles R]

> From: mike shugar [mailto:mikeshu...@hotmail.com] 
> Subject: Minimum Java Version question

> Looking at the versions table here - does "Minimum Java Version" 
> mean the lowest required version to run the Tomcat version

Yes.

> or does it mean the lowest version that can run on the Tomcat version?

That part of the question makes no sense.  The JVM, not Tomcat, runs Java code.

> So can Java 1.3 JARs run on Apache 7 as long Java 1.6 is also installed?

I'll assume that by "Java 1.3 JARs" you mean Java code compiled with a 1.3 JRE. 
 The answer, unfortunately, is maybe.  Sun/Oracle have changed some JRE and 
servlet APIs since 1.3 in an incompatible fashion, so code built on older 
levels may not be loadable by the JVM.  (Tomcat doesn't care, the JVM does.)

> If so, would you expect Java 1.3 to be able to run on all future 
> versions of Tomcat?

That's not up to Tomcat, but rather the JVM.

 - Chuck


THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWISE PROPRIETARY 
MATERIAL and is thus for use only by the intended recipient. If you received 
this in error, please contact the sender and delete the e-mail and its 
attachments from all computers.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org

Minimum Java Version question

[mike shugar]

Hi,

Looking at the versions table here - does "Minimum Java Version" mean the 
lowest required version to run the Tomcat version, or does it mean the lowest 
version that can run on the Tomcat version?
http://tomcat.apache.org/whichversion.html

So can Java 1.3 JARs run on Apache 7 as long Java 1.6 is also installed?

If so, would you expect Java 1.3 to be able to run on all future versions of 
Tomcat?


Thanks,

Mike

Version question

[rick . edwards]

Hi Everyone

I have a version of nsapi_redirector.so which I'm using to pass requests 
from my iPlanet webserver on to a tomcat appserver.  I have no idea what 
version of connector this is and I'd really like to know.  It's working 
fine, so I have no complaints.  The resource who introduced this to our 
environment has since left the company and left little documentation as to 
what he did.  Is there a way to find the version of my 
nsapi_redirector.so?

TIA
Rick





NOTICE:  This confidential e-mail message is only for the intended 
recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that 
disclosing, copying, distributing, or any other use of this message, is 
strictly prohibited. In such case, please destroy this message and notify 
the sender.

-
To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: mod_jk Connector: version question

[Rainer Jung]

1.2.15 ist current stable for linux also. The page is wrong.

I don't know where the binaries come from, so unfortunately at the
moment there seems to be no binary download. If you build yourself, take
1.2.15 sources.

Paul Smith wrote:

I notice here:

http://www.apache.org/dist/tomcat/tomcat-connectors/jk/binaries/

That there are various 'stable' versions for certain O/S.  In  
particular I notice that mod_jk 1.2.15 is considered stable for  Solaris 
and w32 but not Linux.


Any reason? We've done a lot of performance testing with a compiled- 
from-source 1.2.15 on RedHat, but would really like a pre-compiled  
version if we could get away from it (rather use the one everyone  uses 
than one we built).


The changelog for 1.2.15 would seem to indicate that it's the version  
we should be using (those issues fixed don't seem O/S specific.)



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

mod_jk Connector: version question

[Paul Smith]

I notice here:

http://www.apache.org/dist/tomcat/tomcat-connectors/jk/binaries/

That there are various 'stable' versions for certain O/S.  In  
particular I notice that mod_jk 1.2.15 is considered stable for  
Solaris and w32 but not Linux.


Any reason? We've done a lot of performance testing with a compiled- 
from-source 1.2.15 on RedHat, but would really like a pre-compiled  
version if we could get away from it (rather use the one everyone  
uses than one we built).


The changelog for 1.2.15 would seem to indicate that it's the version  
we should be using (those issues fixed don't seem O/S specific.)


thoughts?

cheers,

Paul Smith

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]