shetc schrieb:
The problem is that modifications to the object graph are not persisted to
the database even
though I assume Hibernate's automatic dirty checking would take care of it.
just guessing, but make sure that the second page (the modifing one)
does open a transaction. i don´t have a
So It seems that you cannot control the order of page parameters for
bookmarkablepagelinks can this be true?
What I mean are that I would like to have and url something like this
(and remain stable that way):
mydom.com/mypage/cache/true/product/id , something like that it'll not
work for
Hi Serkan,
I have this log all the time as well. I have no idea what it is suppose
to tell you as the message is clearly not applicable and my application
runs fine.
Anyway, if you run in production mode, the log message is gone.
Regards,
Erik.
Serkan Camurcuoglu wrote:
Hi all,
I need
Hi Nino,
It all depends on the url encoder you use. There are several. See
section 14.2.2 of Wicket in Action, or browse starting from the javadoc
of WebApplication#mount(IRequestTargetUrlCodingStrategy)[1]. The default
I believe is to use BookmarkablePageRequestTargetUrlCodingStrategy, but
you have to set both redirect and setResponsePage
miro wrote:
I tried the redirect ie setRedirect(true), it still does not show the
mountpath.
Michael Sparer wrote:
Subclass form, override onSubmit, make it final, perform the redirect in
there, offer another method to be overriden
igor.vaynberg wrote:
so now you have to do new
DataViewVoid,Foo which is very noisy not to mention you have to
remember which one is for the model and which one is for the
dataprovider.
-igor
I don't know if this is too late, and haven't played with DataViews for a
while but why
Hi everyone!
I'm sorry, I need to have the browser open PDFs automatically (no open or
save dialogs) and in a new window (either a browser window or the standalone
PDF viewer).
So far I've been using this method:
IResourceStream stream = new ByteArrayResource(application/pdf,
Sorry, forgot to mention: I'm using Wicket 1.3.4, and according to Companion.JS
the stacktrace for the error is (most recent call first):
wicket-ajax.js:51
wicket-event.js:110
wicket-event.js:29
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Ahh I started going into the other direction, looking at the
Bookmarkablepagelink itself and noticing that it were using a map, not a
list.
Erik van Oosten wrote:
Hi Nino,
It all depends on the url encoder you use. There are several. See
section 14.2.2 of Wicket in Action, or browse
Hmm digging further into it i tumbled over this setting:
UnitTestSettings.getSortUrlParameters(), line 94,
AbstractRequestTargetUrlCodingStrategy. It scares me abit that it's
called UnitTestSettings..? It seems to provide something about sorting
pageparameters..
Nino Saturnino Martinez
Hi
We talked about this a loong time ago. But theres a service
CafePress.com (could have been there then aswell )which fairly easy lets
you produce wicket merchandise.. So do the community want mugs caps and
t-shirts? And what does the devs say?
--
-Wicket for love
Nino Martinez Wael
Java
Hi all, I totally agree.
We should have some merchandise.
I second the motion :-)
f(t)
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 7:39 AM, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
We talked about this a loong time ago. But theres a service CafePress.com
(could have been there then
Girls can be coders too you know :-)
Michael Sparer wrote:
Sounds cool :-) But I think I wouldn't go further than a mug ... because
talking to girls might become a darn lot more difficult if you wear a Wicket
t-shirt and have to explain it.
oh you look cute but what's that shirt?
well, erm,
Do you think they could make a Wicket wicket? I have always wanted to
try cricket and that would be a great way to get started! ;)
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 6:39 AM, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
We talked about this a loong time ago. But theres a service
Hi,
I have a couple of forms which share the same model. On the first page I
create the model and pass it to the rest of the pages. On each page a
little more information is stored in the model. At the end of the process I
want to write it to a database. Currently I'm trying to use
Yiannis Mavroukakis schrieb:
Girls can be coders too you know :-)
where? how can i get there? :
and yes, i´d love to have that kind of merchandise
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands,
I would dig a t-shirt. The logo is wicked :) and I would get a couple for my
bosses.
- rob
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Wicket-merchandise--tp19066811p19068428.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
shameless_plugAttend the next Wicket meeting in London
:-)/shameless_plug
Uwe Schäfer wrote:
Yiannis Mavroukakis schrieb:
Girls can be coders too you know :-)
where? how can i get there? :
and yes, i´d love to have that kind of merchandise
Did you consider upgrading to 1.3.4? THere are a lot of bugs fixed,
including session leakage.
Martijn
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 3:18 PM, Piller Sébastien [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello guys,
I'm working with wicket 1.3.1. I've just get a very strange stacktrace in my
logs. It is the first
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 2:17 PM, Uwe Schäfer [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Yiannis Mavroukakis schrieb:
Girls can be coders too you know :-)
where? how can i get there? :
+1 count me in also..
just need directions
Just to updateI read in another forum thread that using
LoadableDetachabeModels is not the desired model type for mutliple page
forms (wizards). I guess compoundproperty model is the correct approach.
tdelesio wrote:
Hi,
I have a couple of forms which share the same model. On the
After submit a form with redirect set to true , the wicket generates its own
url and not the mountpath.
Is there a way to avoid this ?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/url-after-form-submit-with-redirect-tp19069918p19069918.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list
Well, it may be an idea... But I started my project using 1.3.1, and
last time I tried to upgrade to any later version than 1.3.1, I had a
lot of problems...
I'll investigate to see if now I can update.
Thanks
Martijn Dashorst a écrit :
Did you consider upgrading to 1.3.4? THere are a lot
a Wicket wicket? thats wicked!
On Wednesday 20 August 2008 14:03:53 James Carman wrote:
Do you think they could make a Wicket wicket? I have always wanted to
try cricket and that would be a great way to get started! ;)
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 6:39 AM, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael
After submitting a form with redirect set to true , the wicket generates
its own url and not the mount path. Is there a way to avoid this ?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/url-after-redirect-tp1906p1906.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at
I could also go for a wicket t-shirt.
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 8:32 AM, robert.mcguinness
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would dig a t-shirt. The logo is wicked :) and I would get a couple for
my
bosses.
- rob
--
View this message in context:
Miro,
In Nabble, please do not edit your message after you've send it. That
way you're message appears twice.
Wicket will always use the mount path of the page you are forwarding to,
that is, if you called setResponsePage. You can also look into mounting
with a HybrodUrlEncoder.
Regards,
Thank you but where can i download the jar or even beter the osgi bundle.
Regards,
Frank
martin-g wrote:
Examples : http://wicketstuff.org/grid-examples/
Source:
https://wicket-stuff.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/wicket-stuff/trunk/inmethod-grid
On Wed, 2008-07-30 at 18:26 -0700,
Yes I have both here is my code
protected void onSubmit() {
setResponsePage(Foo.class);
setRedirect(true);
}
Michael Sparer wrote:
you have to set both redirect and setResponsePage
miro wrote:
I tried the redirect ie setRedirect(true), it
Since I can't wear t-shirts to work (except when I work from home, but
in that case only my dogs would see it anyway), I would like to have a
Wicket polo shirt (or whatever a 3-button, short-sleeved, collared
shirt is called) or an oxford.
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 11:03 AM, Ryan Gravener [EMAIL
CompoundPropertyModel and LoadableDetachableModel can be used in
conjunction (wrap CPM around LDM). However, I think the reason that
you don't want to use LoadableDetachableModel in a wizard situation
is that you'll lose your edits to the object (unless of course you
actually commit the changes
Hi, this might be a really obvious question but... why are pages serialised
for every ajax request? I thought the latest page was always stored in the
PageMap?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Page-serialisation-tp19072319p19072319.html
Sent from the Wicket - User
Not quite true: first Wicket will attach the model, which will load
the data from the database. When the form input is valid, this data
will be propagated to the attached model. = the data will reflect the
input.
The problem is that you don't want to persist the modified input
between the wizard
Failover support needs the updates done by the ajax request.
Martijn
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 6:13 PM, John Patterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, this might be a really obvious question but... why are pages serialised
for every ajax request? I thought the latest page was always stored in the
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 12:19 PM, Martijn Dashorst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not quite true: first Wicket will attach the model, which will load
the data from the database. When the form input is valid, this data
will be propagated to the attached model. = the data will reflect the
input.
If
Is that the only reason? I imagine most sites will be running on one server
with no failover. Is there a way to switch the serialisation of the current
page off if failover support is not required?
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
Failover support needs the updates done by the ajax request.
Hi, I need to store some kind of multi-request transaction data somewhere and
I guess that the PageMap is a better place than the session. I don't see
much talk of custom page maps on the list. Are they still a recommended way
to store things for a browser window?
John
--
View this message in
Shouldn't the serialization be happening in another thread. Are you
seeing performance hits because of it?
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 12:30 PM, John Patterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is that the only reason? I imagine most sites will be running on one server
with no failover. Is there a way
It happens in the same thread.
jwcarman wrote:
Shouldn't the serialization be happening in another thread. Are you
seeing performance hits because of it?
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 12:30 PM, John Patterson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Is that the only reason? I imagine most sites will be
no we need always the latest version on disk before the next request comes
in
This is because if your next request comes in it can change the page then if
you go to another page
and back again we loose a version if it isnt saved yet.
i guess matej can also come up with some other reason for it
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 6:27 PM, James Carman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you don't commit the changes (and you wouldn't want to typically in
a wizard) to the object between pages, then the original data will
merely be loaded from the database and your previous edits will be
lost.
erhm...
yes we have to serializing in another thread was to much over head and very
difficult code
(because of locking and synchronizing)
we save in a separate thread.
johan
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 6:38 PM, John Patterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It happens in the same thread.
jwcarman wrote:
Ahh, so the information is serialized in the same thread, but the
actual saving to disk goes on in another thread. Is that right?
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 12:38 PM, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
no we need always the latest version on disk before the next request comes
in
This is
But if the next request changes the same page that is fine as it is still
stored in memory. When the next page is requested it could bump the current
page out of memory and onto disc. At least that is how I assumed would
work.
Johan Compagner wrote:
no we need always the latest version on
Time for some coder booty! Yes wicket needs more action.
Yiannis Mavroukakis-3 wrote:
Girls can be coders too you know :-)
Michael Sparer wrote:
Sounds cool :-) But I think I wouldn't go further than a mug ... because
talking to girls might become a darn lot more difficult if you wear
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 12:39 PM, Martijn Dashorst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 6:27 PM, James Carman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you don't commit the changes (and you wouldn't want to typically in
a wizard) to the object between pages, then the original data will
merely
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 6:51 PM, John Patterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Time for some coder booty! Yes wicket needs more action.
We already have the ultimate merchandise with Action:
http://manning.com/dashorst :)
- You can take it with you to work without raising eyebrows
- You can take
but you could change the page ... before the previous change is stored
then we loose a version
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 6:48 PM, John Patterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But if the next request changes the same page that is fine as it is still
stored in memory. When the next page is requested
Wow, all I can say is well done. Well done, indeed! :) It's somewhat
more difficult to take the PDF version of the book to the toilet.
People look at me funny at work when I walk into the stall with a
laptop! :)
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 12:53 PM, Martijn Dashorst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On
But all access to the session is serialised? I don't see where a version
could be lost
Normal request for page A: store in memory (not serialised)
Ajax request for page A: alter the page in memory (still only in memory, no
new version)
Normal request for page B: serialise A to disc and place B
Normal request for page A: store in memory (not serialised)
Its serialized.
Ajax request for page A: alter the page in memory (still only in memory, no
new version)
yes page is altered so new version (ajax version)
Normal request for page B: serialise A to disc and place B in memory
Johan Compagner wrote:
Ajax request for page A: alter the page in memory (still only in memory,
no
new version)
yes page is altered so new version (ajax version)
Normal request for page B: serialise A to disc and place B in memory
No now you first do a request to A that can
I'm building a page that uses a DataView to show data. At the top of the
page is a form that has fields for searching and filtering. One of the
requirements is to have a textfield where the user can type in the
exact page they wish to goto. It also has first, prev, next, and last
links. I built
I'm in for a t-shirt and/or mug
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 12:39:20PM +0200, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael
exclaimed:
Hi
We talked about this a loong time ago. But theres a service
CafePress.com (could have been there then aswell )which fairly easy lets
you produce wicket merchandise..
Hi all,
I have a tree component on my page and each tree node has a check box and a
label. I am trying to disable the nodes that have been selected using the
checkbox. The event is fired by pressing a button. Any ideas about how this
could be done???
Thanks in advance,
vishy
--
View this
Tony,
Without seeing the code, I would first try overriding onPopulate, calling
removeAll and then probably super.onPopulate.
If that starts getting a bit hairy, I think that Timo's idea (use
RefreshingView) is probably more sensible anyway, unless there is a special
reason you chose to use a
I want the mug! Perhaps the t-shirt too.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is to confirm our next London Wicket Event (kindly hosted by Google)
will be on October 1st.
Just mark your diary for now, the sign up page will be updated in the next
few days (so you can register then) by which time I should have some more
interesting presentations to tell you about, on
John, if you keep your conversation data in the component (as a java
field), and you work with listeners in that component (e.g. with a
Link), that data is available in the listener (e.g. Link's onClick
callback method).
While coding the component you should not worry about where that data is
Igor, thanks a lot for this hint! With it, I found a solution.
For others with similar problems: I create the following resource in
onBeginRender():
resource = new WebResource()
{
@Override
public IResourceStream getResourceStream()
{
IModelCollectionT model
Hi Cemal Timo,
Thank you for your valuable feedbacks; they pointed me to the right
direction :). I looked up the Wicket API and Wicket In Action book for the
difference of those repeaters. My problem is solved by feeding the ListView
with a LoadableDetachableModel which wraps up the call to the
True, and great work:) But sometimes you want to raise eyebrows:)
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 6:51 PM, John Patterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Time for some coder booty! Yes wicket needs more action.
We already have the ultimate merchandise with Action:
Hehe I can imagine that, that will raise some eyebrows indeed:)
James Carman wrote:
Wow, all I can say is well done. Well done, indeed! :) It's somewhat
more difficult to take the PDF version of the book to the toilet.
People look at me funny at work when I walk into the stall with a
laptop!
So i'll try to get some things done, since there are many that wants
this.. Are there any Wicket found or something if theres any profits on
this? I'll see how far I can get without an real graphical artist:)
Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael wrote:
Hi
We talked about this a loong time
The DateTimeField validation message for hours for a 12-hour format indicates
that the date must be between 0 and 12. Shouldn't this be between 1 and 12?
The validator has the following:
protected Map variablesMap(IValidatable validatable)
{
final Map map =
here is what i do
In Application which is WicketApplication in the init method
mount(new
HybridUrlCodingStrategy(/secure/index.jas/searchPCR,Foo.class,true));
my form object the method onSubmit()
calls setResponsePage(new Foo()); does this matter
and setRedirect(true)
and my web.xml wicket
Hi All,
Forget what I said before - I was convinced by a colleague that the hour
range was wrong when in fact it isn't wrong for the 12-hour range which has
the AM/PM. I'm not sure that the 24-hour range should allow an hour of 24
to be entered but I'm not too familiar with how people use a 24
This is covered in many responses in the archives of this list, and I'm sure
the wiki, but anyway, here's the basics:
If you create a new Page instance, and call setResponsePage(myInstance),
Wicket must respond with *that exact instance.* This means that the URL
needs to be a session-specific
Hi,
Is there a way to get the last visited page by the user? is it possible to
get the history of all pages visited in a given session?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Anyway-to-get-last-visited-page--tp19079302p19079302.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list
hi guys,
i started to work on a little utility to glue some libraries that i
already use with wicket. they became a standard stack when i develop
applications: these are guice, salve, warp-persist and neodatis odb.
this utility is meant to work with wicket, so i thought it would be
nice to add
You might want to check this with the Apache PRC committee. They
handle trademark stuff.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] is your friend.
Martijn
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 10:19 PM, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So i'll try to get some things done, since there are many that
I believe when stuff like this is sold that the profits go to the ASF.
Wicket is their brand/trademark, after all. This page has some sites
that already sell ASF-related merchandise:
http://www.apache.org/foundation/contributing.html
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 7:44 PM, Martijn Dashorst
[EMAIL
A tshirt with
Use IComponentBorder
would be rad.
Nino.Martinez wrote:
We talked about this a loong time ago. But theres a service
CafePress.com (could have been there then aswell )which fairly easy lets
you produce wicket merchandise.. So do the community want mugs caps and
Really great, now we just need it to get packed with Wicket iolite:)
francisco treacy wrote:
hi guys,
i started to work on a little utility to glue some libraries that i
already use with wicket. they became a standard stack when i develop
applications: these are guice, salve, warp-persist and
Thanks i'll do
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
You might want to check this with the Apache PRC committee. They
handle trademark stuff.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] is your friend.
Martijn
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 10:19 PM, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So i'll try to get
http://www.nabble.com/file/p19080723/wicket.jpg
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Wicket-merchandise--tp19066811p19080723.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To
Hello all :)
I have ordered Wicket i Action but it a preorder at Amazon.co.uk :(
mean while I'm learning new stuff every day.
So now I want to do is a nested TD and TR
but i keep getting the: WicketMessage: Unable to find component with id
'itemList' in [MarkupContainer
while i understand
Can you show the Java code also? It should be something like this:
ListView cats = new ListView(CategoryList, catList) {
@Override
protected void populateItem(ListItem item) {
Category cat = item.getModelObject();
The data is not serializable and is needed in several pages as a part of one
transaction
Erik van Oosten wrote:
John, if you keep your conversation data in the component (as a java
field), and you work with listeners in that component (e.g. with a
Link), that data is available in the
Hi,
I have a FileUpload field on a form (which is a required field) that I need
to validate on form submission.
I want to validate wether the File Path entered by the user points to a
valid file or not.
So For example, if user types in TEMP.doc then its invalid. But right now
the Form's on
I agree the StringResourceLoaders should not be cleared, or at least not
automatically cleared behind the scenes. I don't see why anyone would not
want the ComponentStringResourceLoader just because they added some
application specific resource loaders.
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 11:20 PM,
81 matches
Mail list logo
