And the simplest solution, if it is a simple database action, would be
to use a cron job if your database runsund some **ux operating system.
Stefan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional
Thanks a lot for a prompt response, Jeremy
Jeremy Thomerson wrote:
A lot of stuff is stored in the session:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket/branches/wicket-1.4.x/wicket/src/main/java/org/apache/wicket/Session.java
Well, I'm know about this class (probably, not that much as
Igor,
It was a bug.
thanks
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 12:32 PM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.comwrote:
how is the TituloReadOnlyModel used?
-igor
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 8:22 AM, Fernando Wermus
fernando.wer...@gmail.com wrote:
I got this message,
[Warning: String resource for
Hi,
just a few guesses:
- I don't think that this is according to a language problem.
- as far as I can see in your HTML code the DropDown is inside the span
wicket:id=adress_border, so maybe this is an issue
- may be you just ommited it, but I don't see a closing tag for your select
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 1:00 AM, DmitryM nsk...@aol.com wrote:
Thanks a lot for a prompt response, Jeremy
Jeremy Thomerson wrote:
A lot of stuff is stored in the session:
Jeremy,
That makes perfect sense.
I will look into it.
Regards,
Dmitry
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Wicket-clustering-without-web-server-clustering-tp2234048p2234170.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
My boss said that it is not a good practice and he recomended to use
something like in Struts called Timers, do we have something like
that in
wickets¿?
Try looking into Quartz, a library for such things. The lack of a standard
scheduling framework outside of JMX is a problem in JEE in
I can also recommend Quartz, especially with the Spring integration.
(http://static.springsource.org/spring/docs/1.2.9/reference/scheduling.html)
Very stable, and quite easy to set up.
Try looking into Quartz, a library for such things. The lack of a
standard scheduling framework outside
other solution would be to use embedded HSQL, if you want to know how
checkout http://code.google.com/p/wicketcool/, generate project using it,
and check jdbc.properties in domain module.
good luck
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 11:22 PM, Peter Ertl pe...@gmx.org wrote:
maybe you should properly
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 7:00 PM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com wrote:
you can add a servlet context listener that looks for the lock file
and nukes it.
I had a similar idea for a while but hoped for a cleaner approach.
Anyways after reading through the docs it looks like HSQLDB is using
Well, I'm using an embedded (in-process) HSQL, that's the very reason
I get this error. Is wicket-cool addressing this particular issue in
some way?
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 9:54 AM, Paul Szulc paul.sz...@gmail.com wrote:
other solution would be to use embedded HSQL, if you want to know how
(sorry if that gotten reposted, I mistakenly used a different email
address that may have not been registered with the ML)
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 7:00 PM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com wrote:
you can add a servlet context listener that looks for the lock file
and nukes it.
I had a
Hmm wicket-cool generates project that uses embedded hsql as database and
uses it for test in all modules (domain, service and webapplication) as well
as for jetty:run deployment.
I do not have problems you are speaking of so you might as well just try it.
Here is what I did:
jdbc.properties
And that conversion is now completed. We are at wicket 1.4(.9) and everything
seems to be fine. I think we can release wicket-security-1.4.0 today. If we
don't get to it, expect the release next week. We will post an announcement on
this list. Until then, you can use 1.4-rc1. Nothing has
maybe you lack of shutdown=true ? shutdown=true shuts when connections are
closed
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 10:53 AM, Jakub Skoczen skoc...@gmail.com wrote:
(sorry if that gotten reposted, I mistakenly used a different email
address that may have not been registered with the ML)
On Thu, May
Dear All,
I would like to create some binary files, zip them and start download in one
step.
I started with the functionality to create files depending on form input:
form.add(new Button(button1, new Model(Download)) {
@Override
public void onSubmit() {
I found that (here:
http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HHH-1114)
exactly ten minutes ago and was just about to post back here :) .
What's important - it works, so my connection string looks like this:
jdbc:hsqldb:file:temp_db;shutdown=true
Thanks for all the ideas!
On
cool
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 11:49 AM, Jakub Skoczen skoc...@gmail.com wrote:
I found that (here:
http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HHH-1114)
exactly ten minutes ago and was just about to post back here :) .
What's important - it works, so my connection string looks
OK it seems I was missing the concept of bookmarkable page.
Adding the following line into my Application.init() solved it for that page.
mountBookmarkablePage( /HomePage, HomePage.class );
I guess the default wicket config is to only allow direct URL access via the
/ homepage and everything
Hi,
I try to make my components re-usable whenever this is feasible. A
problem that I'm running into is this:
A Component itself decides that it needs a CompoundPropertyModel,
because it wants to use the automatic property model lookups feature
when a model is omitted on a child component.
Wille Faler has had a look at Rails and written up his Wicket vs.
Rails Smackdown [1].
Regards - Cemal
jWeekend
OO Java Technologies, Wicket
Consulting, Development, Training
http://jWeekend.com
[1] http://blog.recursivity.com/post/638788745/wicket-vs-rails-smackdown
Is @SpringBean used *by* the framework?
No, not the core.
A thread local won't work for what we're trying to do, hence the long,
drawn-out discussion thread(s) we've been having recently.
IMHO the discussion threads have not shown a conclusive use case for an ITL.
Some folks like to use
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 9:05 AM, Sven Meier s...@meiers.net wrote:
IMHO the discussion threads have not shown a conclusive use case for an ITL.
What I'm proposing is an alternative to the ITL (which we've shown is
quite ineffective).
Well, this is a strong argument for improved support of
Hmm Eelco, im puzling with a guice quartz integration as well. it's
here and not at all complete (along with an ehcache integration) :
http://code.google.com/p/slurry/
2010/5/28 Eelco Hillenius eelco.hillen...@gmail.com:
I had a terrible day because one of my bosses complain about how I have
Here is the link of the component implementing this use case:
http://pastebin.com/0GwGXkmr
The usage is pretty simple:
new ProcessExecutorPanel(associatedFilesMigration) {
@Override
protected void execute() {
//a business logic method which takes a lot time to
Hi Guys
I wanted to try out the now working wicket injector holder for my
webapp. But I keep getting:
java.lang.IllegalStateException: EntityManager is closed
at
org.hibernate.ejb.EntityManagerImpl.getSession(EntityManagerImpl.java:66)
at
OK, no ITL, got it.
Then, you can use that Runnable anywhere to run a task
with all of the appropriate Wickety goodness set up for you (except
for the request cycle of course because you're not executing within a
request cycle).
But what are the use cases for *this* proposal (beside mail
I am sorry but I don't knwo what ITL is? Could you explained a little?
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 10:33 AM, Sven Meier s...@meiers.net wrote:
OK, no ITL, got it.
Then, you can use that Runnable anywhere to run a task
with all of the appropriate Wickety goodness set up for you (except
for the
ITL = InheritableThreadLocal
Here is the link of the component implementing this use case:
http://pastebin.com/0GwGXkmr
The usage is pretty simple:
new ProcessExecutorPanel(associatedFilesMigration) {
@Override
protected void execute() {
//a business logic method
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 9:35 AM, Fernando Wermus
fernando.wer...@gmail.com wrote:
I am sorry but I don't knwo what ITL is? Could you explained a little?
InheritableThreadLocal variables. Sorry, we've just had a rather
lengthy conversation over the past week about them, so I guess I
figured
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 9:33 AM, Sven Meier s...@meiers.net wrote:
But what are the use cases for *this* proposal (beside mail generation)?
Probably whatever they were that caused the team to implement the ITL
approach in the first place. My suggestion is an alternative to the
ITL approach to
On Friday 28 May 2010 15:33:16 Sven Meier wrote:
OK, no ITL, got it.
Then, you can use that Runnable anywhere to run a task
with all of the appropriate Wickety goodness set up for you (except
for the request cycle of course because you're not executing within a
request cycle).
But what
Why so much trouble inside your UI layer? Normally Wicket components are
single-threaded, but with your solution you may introduce race conditions.
Move the ExecutorService into your service layer:
http://pastebin.com/NN58fiZx
new ProcessExecutorPanel(associatedFilesMigration) {
Hi,
I have form which contains group of radio buttons input fields, this form
contains some fields are mandatory custom validations, when i submit this
form with wrong data it validates and it comes with the error messages this
is normal, but it also clears the input fields ..
Could you
The problem is that injectedSpringBean won't work because it needs
Application :)...
Alex
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/PROPOSAL-Application-runAs-Method-tp2230030p2234639.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Please take another look on http://pastebin.com/NN58fiZx - it will work :).
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/PROPOSAL-Application-runAs-Method-tp2230030p2234652.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
The problem is not with the ProcessExecutorPanel component.. but with the way
you execute it:
because the client needs a reference to injectedSpringBean which cannot be
resolved unless it is invoked from within a thread which can access
Application, because @SpringBean needs it.
--
View this
Dear All,
I am a bit confused where the error is: Is it Ubuntu Tomcat configuration or
there is a specific approach to save files from Wicket.
My Application generates several binary files. After files generated I want
to pack them in zip archive and allow user to download them.
Is it possible to
But in my example start() *is* invoked on the request thread, thus the Wicket
application is available.
Please take another look on http://pastebin.com/NN58fiZx .
--
View this message in context:
This looks like an issue with your Java installation, which you could verify
with a simple standalone test, e.g.,
public static void main(String[] args) { // create file as in Wicket.. }
Ed.
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 11:12 AM, Alex Zeit zeita...@googlemail.com wrote:
Dear All,
I am a bit
So, don't use the feature. If yours works, then fine. Some folks are
doing things asynchronously where they need the Application in place.
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 11:31 AM, Sven Meier s...@meiers.net wrote:
But in my example start() *is* invoked on the request thread, thus the Wicket
I'm still spinning my wheels on this one.
Let me try to explain better..
On the page I have
@Inject DAOFactory
@Inject MyService
On the DAOFactory I have
@Inject DAO1
@Inject DAO2
etc...
On MyService I have
@Inject DAO1
In my module I have
bind(MyService.class).toInstance(new
What is the service layer that you speak of?
Is this built into wicket?
D/
On May 28, 2010, at 9:06 AM, Sven Meier wrote:
Why so much trouble inside your UI layer? Normally Wicket components are
single-threaded, but with your solution you may introduce race conditions.
Move the
Hi.
It would be great, if you'd consider including following code to make
TextField, that is assigned to date picker, aware of date picker itself. So,
when TextField is clicked, picker calendar would be displayed.
Implement it is very easy:
in wicket-date.js:
add some configuration property,
Perhaps you would be interested in the other threads that have been
going on where we discuss InheritableThreadLocal. In there Jeremy
gave a good solution that would fix what you're seeing. Basically,
you use the beforeExecute()/afterExecute() methods to set/clear the
Application's ThreadLocal
Hello,
Based on the feedback I received on when to cut the 1.4.8 and 1.4.9
releases I have decided to perform them now versus later.
I have created branches for each wicket version starting from 1.4.7
through 1.4.9.
1.4.7 line :
Martin,
Thanks for your response.
I did try ((CastToYourSession) Session.get()) and that part works. I wanted
to do something as following:
public class MyOwnStreamLocator extends ResourceStreamLocator
{
//protected
protected App app;
Great :)
2010/5/28 Michael O'Cleirigh michael.ocleir...@rivulet.ca:
Hello,
Based on the feedback I received on when to cut the 1.4.8 and 1.4.9 releases
I have decided to perform them now versus later.
I have created branches for each wicket version starting from 1.4.7 through
1.4.9.
Hmm.. I wouldn't use string constants like that... use Class.getName() instead.
**
Martin
2010/5/28 msalman mohammad_sal...@yahoo.com:
Martin,
Thanks for your response.
I did try ((CastToYourSession) Session.get()) and that part works. I wanted
to do something as following:
public
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 4:46 AM, Alex Zeit zeita...@googlemail.com wrote:
Dear All,
I would like to create some binary files, zip them and start download in
one
step.
I started with the functionality to create files depending on form input:
form.add(new Button(button1, new
Yes, I see now. Thanks!
The only drawback of this approach is that the client code is responsible
for creating the Future. The initial purpose was to hide the implementation
details related to thread creation.
Alex
--
View this message in context:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multitier_architecture
On 05/28/2010 06:04 PM, Douglas Ferguson wrote:
What is the service layer that you speak of?
Is this built into wicket?
D/
On May 28, 2010, at 9:06 AM, Sven Meier wrote:
Why so much trouble inside your UI layer? Normally Wicket
The details of thread creation are hidden from your Wicket class - IMHO
this is a good thing.
Sven
On 05/28/2010 07:08 PM, Alex Objelean wrote:
Yes, I see now. Thanks!
The only drawback of this approach is that the client code is responsible
for creating the Future. The initial purpose was to
asynchronously where they need the Application in place
As I've written I still don't see a reason why they need the Application
at all.
Sven
On 05/28/2010 05:50 PM, James Carman wrote:
So, don't use the feature. If yours works, then fine. Some folks are
doing things asynchronously
I've been following the thread to some degree, but I missed that.
Is there a code example somewhere?
D/
On May 28, 2010, at 11:34 AM, James Carman wrote:
Perhaps you would be interested in the other threads that have been
going on where we discuss InheritableThreadLocal. In there Jeremy
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 9:05 AM, dellik2004 dellik2...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I have form which contains group of radio buttons input fields, this form
contains some fields are mandatory custom validations, when i submit
this
form with wrong data it validates and it comes with the error
2010/5/28 Vytautas Čivilis cvl...@gmail.com
Hi.
It would be great, if you'd consider including following code to make
TextField, that is assigned to date picker, aware of date picker itself.
So,
when TextField is clicked, picker calendar would be displayed.
Implement it is very easy:
I found this:
http://pastebin.com/NN58fiZx
But I don't see anything that would tied the Application to the child thread.
It is just a button that would exec a thread for you.
D/
On May 28, 2010, at 1:06 PM, Douglas Ferguson wrote:
I've been following the thread to some degree, but I missed
I know all this, I was just hoping you would explain what you were trying to
say.
On May 28, 2010, at 12:18 PM, Sven Meier wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multitier_architecture
On 05/28/2010 06:04 PM, Douglas Ferguson wrote:
What is the service layer that you speak of?
Is this
Even if I got that to work, it doesn't explain why some things using @Inject
blow up and others don't.
There has to be a reason for this. Under what circumstances to an injected
object need a reference to the Application?
D/
On May 28, 2010, at 11:34 AM, James Carman wrote:
Perhaps you
If it's of any use, I put together a very, very simple 2D Quickstart for my
own edification. I've deployed, exercised and un-deployed builds of
application using Wicket 1.4.8 and 1.4.9 to Weblogic 10.
In the former case I do not see, via YourKit, the Java2D Disposer thread
holding a reference to
I had the same results with tomcat 6... We could try to see what happens with
other web servers with combination of different jdk versions. Until now,
there was no prove of the memory leak.
--
View this message in context:
The link you have found was a workaround to avoid the problem. You can see
the actual problem in this example:
http://pastebin.com/0GwGXkmr
The usage example:
@SpringBean
private Service service;
new ProcessExecutorPanel(associatedFilesMigration) {
@Override
protected void
mountBookmarkablePage is a convenience method for mounting the most common URL
form.
Look here for more info:
https://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/url-coding-strategies.html
You can also create your and mount your own URL decoding strategies.
- Original Message -
From: Mike Quilleash
As I said when I determined the same thing (I attached a quickstart to
the JIRA issue), the fact that it doesn't leak isn't really the
biggest negative, IMHO. The fact that it doesn't work for the desired
usecase (thread pools) is a huge negative and a reason it should be
backed out (which it has
I'm not insisting on bringing it back, but I don't understand on what is
based your conclusion that it doesn't work for the desired use-case (thread
pools) ?
Alex
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/announce-Release-Wicket-1-4-9-tp2228179p2235138.html
What exactly is the solution?
I've read the code and it looks like the Application would still not be
available in the runner thread.
D/
On May 28, 2010, at 3:00 PM, Alex Objelean wrote:
The link you have found was a workaround to avoid the problem. You can see
the actual problem in this
This worked for me..
@Override
public void run() {
The ITL's value is copied when a thread is created, so it will either:
a. Never get copied to the pooled threads.
b. Get copied one time into the pooled threads (the pooled thread is
started during a request thread for some reason). If there are
multiple Wicket applications running in the same
There are two proposed solutions:
1) use the beforeExecute()/afterExecute() methods to set/clear the
Application's ThreadLocal variable so that it's available during the
execution of the task.
2) Let the client code to create the Future. Though it is a good approach, I
don't like the fact that
That's what the other one did, but it used the callback methods to do
the set/unset. This way, you don't have to clutter up each task's
code.
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 4:23 PM, Douglas Ferguson
doug...@douglasferguson.us wrote:
This worked for me..
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 4:25 PM, Alex Objelean alex.objel...@gmail.com wrote:
2) Let the client code to create the Future. Though it is a good approach, I
don't like the fact that the client is responsible for implementing such
details each time it overrides the execute() method. It would be
Yes, I agree. I do prefer this solution too.
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/using-injected-services-in-a-child-thread-tp2233924p2235166.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
No, it is about Sven Maier's solution: http://pastebin.com/NN58fiZx
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/using-injected-services-in-a-child-thread-tp2233924p2235168.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Sorry, I didn't want to bore you with this whole pattern stuff (which
you probably know too):
- single responsibility,
- facade,
- object (thread) pool,
- active object,
- DI,
- yada yada yada.
I fail to see how the original implementation of ProcessExecutorPanel
confirms to any of these
What are you agreeing with? I can't see the thread...
On May 28, 2010, at 3:30 PM, Alex Objelean wrote:
Yes, I agree. I do prefer this solution too.
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/using-injected-services-in-a-child-thread-tp2233924p2235166.html
I'm looking at that URL and I don't see anything in either of those snipets of
code that would solve the problem.
Can you explain?
On May 28, 2010, at 3:34 PM, Alex Objelean wrote:
No, it is about Sven Maier's solution: http://pastebin.com/NN58fiZx
--
View this message in context:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-2899
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 9:18 PM, Jeremy Thomerson jer...@wickettraining.com
wrote:
2010/5/28 Vytautas Čivilis cvl...@gmail.com
Hi.
It would be great, if you'd consider including following code to make
TextField, that is assigned to
The idea is that with the first solution you don't have to clutter up each
task's code:
1) use the beforeExecute()/afterExecute() methods to set/clear the
Application's ThreadLocal variable so that it's available during the
execution of the task.
--
View this message in context:
Is there an example of this that somebody could link me to?
On May 28, 2010, at 3:56 PM, Alex Objelean wrote:
The idea is that with the first solution you don't have to clutter up each
task's code:
1) use the beforeExecute()/afterExecute() methods to set/clear the
Application's
I don't understand why do you think that a component responsible for creating
a thread and check its status does too much, is it really that
complicated?? And also, pardon me, but what mess are you talking about?
--
View this message in context:
Does anyone have experience with using Rich Text Editors in Wicket?
Javascript editors I am aware of are:
FckEditor
CkEditor
TinyMCE
Anyone integrated these with wicket? Any advice or opinions?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Hi,
thanks for you input! It's not a html problem, when i copy/paste the
english html code (who is working) into my _fr html file, i get the same
error...
yes, i ommited /select in this mail but not in my code :)
and i write my mails in html format so i have to break the html code with \
--
The one I know is from Visural project
http://visural-wicket-examples.appspot.com/app/rich-text-editor It is
already defined Wicket component
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 11:21 PM, Chris Colman chr...@stepaheadsoftware.com
wrote:
Does anyone have experience with using Rich Text Editors in Wicket?
Yes, the link is here: http://pastebin.com/TyDrCCCr
Basically, you have to replace:
final ExecutorService service =
Executors.newSingleThreadScheduledExecutor();
with:
final Application app = Application.get();
final ExecutorService service = new ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor(1)
{
Going back to my original example..
With the Application.set() trick I am able to keep it from blow up, but why
would MyService call Application.get() (and thus blow up).
When the DAOs don't. They are both @Inject and they are both setup in my guice
module as singleton
D/
On May 28, 2010, at
Make sure it's using the markup files you think it is. Turn on the logging
for the markup finder thingy.
On May 28, 2010 5:23 PM, Matthieu m_fradco...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hi,
thanks for you input! It's not a html problem, when i copy/paste the
english html code (who is working) into my _fr
Quoting Chris Colman chr...@stepaheadsoftware.com:
Does anyone have experience with using Rich Text Editors in Wicket?
I've used the TinyMCE integration from Wicketstuff
(http://wicketstuff.org/confluence/display/STUFFWIKI/wicket-contrib-tinymce),
but then ended up using YUI Editor
Visural looks nice but I can't see any tool bar icon for adding images.
The users of my site need to be able to add images, tables etc.,
Currently we use FckEditor with an Echo3 component but I want users to
be able to do rich text editing in the Wicket pages of our app.
-Original
Hello wicket ppl,
im pretty new in wicket and im facing a problem which seems to me like im
missing some basic understanding here.
I have a form which is supposed to fill a filter object. So i add some
TextFields with property models, based on that object, to the form (actually to
a
YUI sure looks better than Visural. Unfortunately it still doesn't have
the nice right click/context menu that FckEditor has - have to double
click on an image to get to its properties form. It also doesn't have
all the powerful advanced styling options that FckEditor has - well not
in the
For sure it has to be:
filterContainer.add(new TextFieldFilterObject(filterFoo, new
PropertyModelFilterObject(filter, foo)));
filterContainer.add(new TextFieldFilterObject(filterBar, new
PropertyModelFilterObject(filter, bar)));
[Beta Systems Disclaimer/Impressum:
Hi,
your textfields are bound to the initial filter object. When you change
this member later on, the models will still look on the initial filter
object.
Use the following:
filterContainer.add(new TextFieldFilterObject(filterFoo, new
PropertyModelPersonFilter(this, filter.foo)));
...
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 5:06 PM, Benedikt Schlegel
benedikt.schle...@betasystems.com wrote:
Hello wicket ppl,
im pretty new in wicket and im facing a problem which seems to me like im
missing some basic understanding here.
I have a form which is supposed to fill a filter object. So i add
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 5:21 PM, Sven Meier s...@meiers.net wrote:
filterContainer.add(new TextFieldFilterObject(filterFoo, new
PropertyModelPersonFilter(this, filter.foo)));
I should have said option three is this one from Sven.
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com
Hi,
Could any one please help me fixing this panel refresh issue.
first time the panel is refreshed. and that too with (setResponsePage() as
workaround).
Afterwards it is not getting refreshed at all. Always retains the previous
value...
1.I have an Ajaxbutton, on click of it- opens a
Hello,
I've created a new template for wicketstuff-core releases. After every
wicket release we will create a branch from trunk that locks in the
wicket version and cut a matching release like wicketstuff-core-1.4.9.
At a certain point in time (either a window of time to be determined) or
Hi,
My application uses wicket 1.4.3, spring hibernate.
In the past I've got @SpringBean working in servlets by using
'InjectorHolder.getInjector().inject(this);' in their init method.
I've updated my wicket version to 1.4.4 (or any other newer version) and
fixed a compilation error in wicket
you can use spring's servlet support...
-igor
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 5:22 PM, Sam Zilverberg samzilverb...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
My application uses wicket 1.4.3, spring hibernate.
In the past I've got @SpringBean working in servlets by using
'InjectorHolder.getInjector().inject(this);' in
Good idea.
Using:
ApplicationContext context =
WebApplicationContextUtils.getWebApplicationContext(getServletContext());
someDao = (IDAOentity) context.getBean(someDao);
Works.
However I was hoping to continue using @SpringBean somehow...
-Sam
1 - 100 of 106 matches
Mail list logo
