Thanks for the answer - that gives me the right direction. Say, do you know if
it would be possible to have the wicket component part not in the url like
currently but using a named parameter? e.g.:
http://examples7x.wicket.apache.org/forminput/?0-1.IFormSubmitListener-inputForm
should instead
Hi,
>http://examples7x.wicket.apache.org/forminput/?0-1.IFormSubmitListener-inputForm
"0-1.IFormSubmitListener-inputForm" *is* a parameter, it just doesn't
have a value.
How would renaming that parameter improve anything?
Have fun
Sven
Am 30.06.2018 um 12:06 schrieb Korbinian Bachl:
Thank
Hi Sven,
well, the problem here are our clever webbots - especially bing and even worse
google :)
See, bingbot or googlebot index now e.g.:
(derived from wicket examples)
www.domain.com/choice
and a load of bullshit like
choice?2-1.IBehaviorListener.0-form-makes
choice?2-1.IBehaviorListener
Hi!
Well that’s something you can fix by embedding a canonical url in your
page. It tells search engines to ignore all other urls for that page,
including the ones with wicket info in them.
// Bas
Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPhone
> Op 30 jun. 2018 om 19:41 heeft Korbinian Bachl
> het volgende gesc
Yeah - no;
the problem is here the amount of pages and the crawl-budget of a crawler per
domain;
If you waste 1000's of urls you get not indexed well enough and even penalized;
I know this and we use canonical all over the places, but seo guys clearly
showed that we need to get rid of this and