I have to convince my chief that it worth to migrate the application to
wicket-1.3. Can you help me to create a list of arguments?
Thank you!
Alex.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Reasons-for-migrating-to-wicket-1.3-tf4256393.html#a12113341
Sent from the Wicket - User
whether we should support the
state when client and server are out of sync.
-Matej
On 8/14/07, Alex Objelean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This means that the component enable state must be always in sync with
the
client side state? Shouldn't it be set automatically as not enabled after
I've got randomly an exception when clicking on the table row which has an
AjaxEventBehavior assigned.
Below is the stacktrace. Any ideas?
[10:34:27.875] ERROR [http-8080-Processor1] RequestCycle - component
body:panel:actionListContainer:actionList:form:actionList:14 not found on
page
to be converted to a nonnull object.
-igor
On 8/14/07, Alex Objelean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I found a quick fix for my issue: instead of disabling the Textfield, I
make
it readonly... still wondering why the change has been made in the
convert()
method.
Matej Knopp-2 wrote:
At this point
Eelco, you're right!
The latest profiling shows where the bottleneck is... it is indeed not where
I was looking for.
I thought it was because of serialization because when using 1.2.x branch i
found out that setSerializeSessionAttributes(false) improved a lot
application responsiveness.
Thank
I've got the following exception when submit a form... (the same code worked
fine with wicket-1.2.6)
Any thougths?
[10:39:10.071] ERROR [http-8080-Processor8] RequestCycle - Could not find
Form parent for [MarkupContainer [Component id = editOrCancel, page =
Well, in this case the bottleneck was caused by an expensive call which was
not cashed inside a very long list... Anyway, profiling tools helps very
much in such cases, so I would recommend everybody who have performance
issues to use it. :)
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
Eelco, you're right!
The
Me too :)... YourKit rocks! :)
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
Well, in this case the bottleneck was caused by an expensive call which
was
not cashed inside a very long list... Anyway, profiling tools helps very
much in such cases, so I would recommend everybody who have performance
issues to use
can discuss it
here if you like. for example you can list some pros and cons that you
think
the current approach has.
-igor
On 8/15/07, Alex Objelean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you believe that the usecase is obscure, shouldn't this approach to be
reconsidered? Or at least discussed
i dont think this is needed. your custom converter should include a null
check.
But I do not use custom converter. In my case it is about a simple String or
Integer or whatever...
So, you suggest to create a custom converter for each case where I disable
the form component on the
you!
Alex.
igor.vaynberg wrote:
unfortunately formcomponent:565 doesnt point to anything useful. mind
trying
again with the trunk build? it looks like formcomponent is trying to find
its form, do you have it inside a form?
-igor
On 8/16/07, Alex Objelean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
I've noticed that wicket-extension components (for instance palette.js)
pollute the js namespace. Wouldn't it be better to create a namespace for
them? Something like this would be pretty: Wicket.Extensions.Palette.
This proposal is valid for any other components which contribute with js
files.
html works, your input type=submit have to
be
inside a form, and that is what Button is designed to represent.
-igor
On 8/27/07, Alex Objelean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, indeed. In my case I have a Button component which is not inside a
Form.
The workaround for this issue is to use
don't remember it. If you even
attach
a patch I'm sure it will be addressed. :)
Frank
On 8/27/07, Alex Objelean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is not a bug. It is a kind of RFE or a request for usage of best
practices
when coding client-side code. I was curious if you share the same
thoughts
don't remember it. If you even
attach
a patch I'm sure it will be addressed. :)
Frank
On 8/27/07, Alex Objelean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is not a bug. It is a kind of RFE or a request for usage of best
practices
when coding client-side code. I was curious if you share the same
thoughts
I've discovered the following issue:
When using a DateTextField in a form (with the format: dd/MM/), user by
mistake add an extra space (for instance: 06/09/2007 ) and submit the
form. The are two problems:
1) I would expect the convertor to convert this value correct, but the
I am curious, what is your use case for chaining behaviors?
I think that if you have two things that you want to chain, then chain them
in the same handler, or use decorator to add the client-side code.
Alex
paolo di tommaso wrote:
Carlos,
Can you provide an example of your custom
), but this is not that easy (God bless
IE).
Alex
Alex Objelean wrote:
I've got randomly an exception when clicking on the table row which has an
AjaxEventBehavior assigned.
Below is the stacktrace. Any ideas?
[10:34:27.875] ERROR [http-8080-Processor1] RequestCycle - component
each scheduled ajax request to check if the originating DOM
element is still in the document.
-Matej
On 9/6/07, Alex Objelean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Right now, I do not know if this kind of issue can be fixed on the wicket
side. But what I do know for sure, is that this have to do
report a JIRA issue and attach a quick start project?
-Matej
On 9/6/07, Alex Objelean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've discovered the following issue:
When using a DateTextField in a form (with the format: dd/MM/), user
by
mistake add an extra space (for instance: 06/09/2007 ) and submit
I've grabbed the latest SNAPSHOT from the repository and have noticed that
AbstractRepeater#onBeforeRender is final. I wonder what is the reason for
this? (I need to do something in it's subclass)
/**
* @see org.apache.wicket.Component#onBeforeRender()
*/
can remove the
code, because after recent changes onBeforeRender() is only called
when component is visible in hierarchy.
-Matej
On 9/6/07, Alex Objelean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've grabbed the latest SNAPSHOT from the repository and have noticed
that
AbstractRepeater#onBeforeRender
is called only when
component is visible. But IMHO that's no longer necessary.
-Matej
On 9/6/07, Alex Objelean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would prefer to use onBeforeRender, instead of onPopulate, since it is
the
I do in other components. Why would I use different life-cycle methods
Done. Here is the issue link:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-935 WICKET-935
Matej Knopp-2 wrote:
Please do, so that we don't forget.
-Matej
On 9/6/07, Alex Objelean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thank you again, Matej! :)
Will it be fixed, or should I create a task
/apache/wicket/
On 9/6/07, Matej Knopp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dunno, there's still work to do, but there are snapshot somewhere
available, you can grab those if you don't want to build wicket.
-Matej
On 9/6/07, Alex Objelean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thank you very much Matej! To be honest
. Can you please
create a jira entry and add a quickstart project? This might be a
corner case, I'd like to fix this asap.
-Matej
On 9/6/07, Alex Objelean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With the latest SNAPSHOT, the application throws Exception almost always
:(... I thing, it has not been tested
try to
isolate the problem?
-Matej
On 9/6/07, Alex Objelean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's quite hard to create a quickstart project, since the project I'm
working
on is very large. But if you think that it is enough to create a JIRA
task
with the stacktrace and short description, than
It's only a false alarm. Sorry. My fault. Probably I didn't perform a 'clean'
before the application has been deployed. The issue is CLOSED!
PS: Big 'THANK YOU' to Matej :).
Alex Objelean wrote:
Last post was completely wrong.
Here is another handler which works ok:
var
wcall
In our application, for long running ajax request we block the screen, so the
user is unable to click somewhere else.
Alex.
Sam Hough wrote:
OK. Should give me fewer nightmares even if it doesn't explain current
problem.
Many thanks. It is probably just my dodgy code.
What pattern do
that
would check for this, there is some support for this in JSR305, but who
knows when that will come to fruition. until then the only sure way to do
this is to make the method final :|
-igor
On 9/6/07, Alex Objelean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The way I do it, is this:
protected void
the data
stuff's size (including the detach logic)?
Martijn
On 9/10/07, Alex Objelean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If the pages wouldn't be serializable, it wouldn't work in development
mode.
Is it right?
I think that it is not necessarily about how large is application, in my
case
secondlevelcachesessionstore should be usable for you as well,
but that would require not serializing everyhing, rather then that
just keep things in memory and inject the dependencies on
deserialization.
-Matej
On 9/10/07, Alex Objelean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Indeed, it is a very big component hierarchy
Objelean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How can I figure it out?
Johan Compagner wrote:
if you save the page to disk how big is it?
johan
On 9/10/07, Alex Objelean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Indeed, it is a very big component hierarchy (It contains at least 3
levels
of nested
null (when you e.g go to
another page and return back), you can reinject it. Or you can just
store it to session (outside the page). There are numerious
possibilities, but you need to find out first where the bottleneck is.
-Matej
On 9/10/07, Alex Objelean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matej
wrote:
you got to be kidding me...32MB
really? Or is this a nice joke so in the middle of the day :)
johan
On 9/10/07, Alex Objelean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is about 32MB. Kind a big page :)
Matej Knopp-2 wrote:
Turn on SecondLevelCacheSessionStore, and use
keep the last rendered page in
memory as I understand it, so that 32MB will still be claimed,
whatever store you choose.
Martijn
On 9/10/07, Alex Objelean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:) Unfortunately it's not a joke, but I'm glad you're having fun :D.
Actually, this is result of worst case
Johan, Matej, Martijn,
thank you all for help!
PS: one more reason to love this community :)
Johan Compagner wrote:
if you just have 1 page with no back button support/all ajax
then httpsessionstore is fine
johan
On 9/10/07, Alex Objelean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
I use the wicket-1.3-snapshot (from 9th sept). In development mode, I expect
that any change to markup would be visible after the page is refreshed (as
it does in wicket-1.3-beta3). But it doesn't. Any ideas why?
Alex.
--
View this message in context:
JIRA issue created: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-959
WICKET-959
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
Could you open a JIRA issue please so that we can fix either the WIKI or a
bug?
Eelco
On 8/27/07, Alex Objelean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence
.
-Matej
On 9/17/07, Alex Objelean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Currently, I override the onBeforeRender() when I want to make some
changes
to the modelObject used by my custom component. For instance, if
(condition)
{//update model object from service}. This is what I mean by own logic.
I
thought
This is about how wicket generates dynamically markupID.
I have, for instance, the following markup component:
input wicket:id=quantity.noOfUnits /
The generated markupId for this component looks like the following:
quantity.noOfUnits1232 .
I suggest to escape any css valid specifiers from
JIRA issue created: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-995
WICKET-995
Matej Knopp-2 wrote:
Can you please submit a bug report.
-Matej
On 9/21/07, Alex Objelean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is about how wicket generates dynamically markupID.
I have, for instance
case for using id?
Alex Objelean wrote:
My personal opinion is that switching from id to class is not such a good
idea, simply because the ID attributes guaranties (of course you can
create two elements with same ID, but it is not the same as with class
attribute) the unicity
are going to stop using ids and move over to class as it make re-use
easier and avoids a number of wicket problems with ids... The HTML monkey
is not happy though. He reminds me of the Family Guy screaming monkey
today.
Alex Objelean wrote:
This is about how wicket generates dynamically
.
Alex Objelean wrote:
In my application I extensively use the component generated id to perform
some DOM updates on the client side, also for client-side validation.
Also getting a DOM element by its ID is the fastest method comparing with
finding it using it's css class.
Sam
just make sure all your wicket ids are universally unique? So
none that are just form, label, button etc? I quite like using
button if only one within the container...
What if you want to use the same component twice?
Alex Objelean wrote:
Performance on the client side is very important
with the magical id mangling behavior you suggest. If JQuery
can't handle valid HTML id's, that's a JQuery bug and not a Wicket bug.
-Ryan
On Sep 21, 2007, at 4:44 AM, Alex Objelean wrote:
This is about how wicket generates dynamically markupID.
I have, for instance, the following
Why would a developer be confused by something that is generated
automatically? Do you really care if the generated markup id is quantity1
or quantity_1 or quantity-1? Whats the difference?
Ryan Holmes wrote:
The automatic transformation of certain characters by a framework is
exactly
That is wrong! In wicket-1.3.x branch the underscore is not used as a
hierarchy separator. It was used before the 1.3.x branch. Take a look on
generated id's..
Ryan Holmes wrote:
..and the underscore is used as a hierarchy separator.
--
View this message in context:
Why would you need to predict the id? That is the point - you should not rely
on generated id, all you know that it is unique. If you want to be sure what
is the id, just override the Component#getMarkupId()...
Ryan Holmes wrote:
I think a simple and predictable markup id generation scheme
to an HTML ID with a period in it, then that's a
JQuery bug since it is a valid ID.
On Sep 25, 2007, at 12:40 AM, Alex Objelean wrote:
It's not a jquery bug at all. The '.' character is interpreted as a
css
class. So, the $(#quantity.noOfUnits1232) translates in element
with ID
I don't think that there is a wicket way to do something like this, but you
can achieve the same behavior using javascript.
Alex.
Oliver Lieven wrote:
Hi,
I wonder if there's a way for a component to determine if it is embedded
inside some specific HTML tag, e.g. determine if it is
Currently, wicket does not support nested wicket:enclosure tags. It would be
very useful. What do you think?
Thank you!
Alex.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/-RFE--Nested-wicket%3Aenclosure-tf4593044.html#a13112204
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at
I've noticed that the content of the ModalWindow is being rendered even when
the ModalWindow itself is not shown. I wonder if it is correct behavior. Any
thoughts?
Alex.
--
View this message in context:
/wicket:enclosure
In this case, I would expect that if the child1 is not visible, also child2
would not be visible. Unfortunately the actual behavior exactly opposite:
child1 is not visible, while child2 is visible.
Alex Objelean wrote:
Currently, wicket does not support nested wicket:enclosure tags
Take a look on LoadableDetachableModel..
Ayodeji Aladejebi wrote:
Basically there is an object like this, a common model
class User{
Long id;
String username;
String password;
String fullname;
...
List collections;
}
From most examples and basic approach, i see references
http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/dropdownchoice-examples.html#DropDownChoiceExamples-UsingAjax
Here is an example from wiki.
Rich Livingstone wrote:
I'm just not sure how to do this - for example, I have a drop down choice
and when it changes, I need to populate other fields. I had
I've noticed that when working in development mode with beta4, changing the
markup is not visible when browser page is refreshed (in beta3 was ok) -
thus a restart is needed. Are there any ModificationWatcher changes in
latest beta release?
Thank you!
Alex.
--
View this message in context:
too have beta4 installed. And have not problems
when refreshing html. At certain times there can be problems with the
java classes, which I belive are known(there are some limitations on the
hotspot vm I belive that causes this). This is using it with tomcat 5.
Alex Objelean wrote:
I've
In parent/pom.xml there is a dependency on spring-2.0. I most of the
projects, it is a best practice to not use the entire spring as a
dependency, but to use modular dependencies (eg: spring-core, spring-web,
etc).
For instance, now you depend on spring-2.0 and the project we are building
is
Why would you use SiteMesh, when wicket has such a nice templating?
Sean Sullivan-3 wrote:
Is anybody using Wicket 1.3 and SiteMesh together?
http://www.opensymphony.com/sitemesh
Sean
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
You mean DateTextField (instead of DateTimeField). It has also this
constructor:
DateTextField(String id, IModel model, String datePattern)
where datePattern can be: mm/DD/.
Alex
raybristol wrote:
there is a good example about use DateTextfield in :
, because I need no only the date but the
time as well.
Many thanks
Ray
Alex Objelean wrote:
You mean DateTextField (instead of DateTimeField). It has also this
constructor:
DateTextField(String id, IModel model, String datePattern)
where datePattern can be: dd/MM/.
Alex
In order to avoid ClassCastException, when constructing a new instance of
WicketTester, initialize it with your MainApplication:
WicketTester tester = new WicketTester(new MainApplication());
Andy Barlow [Deftex] wrote:
I have an application which used Session EJB's to deliver data to
Using AutoComponentResolver, you can add a feedback panel like this:
wicket:component
class=org.apache.wicket.markup.html.panel.FeedbackPanel/
Ricardo Mayerhofer wrote:
I started to use wicket some time ago, and I'm really enjoying it. Best
framework ever.
But I've some suggestions.
I
LDM is a LoadableDetachableModel
Flavius wrote:
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
With Wicket 1.3 only one page should be stored in session. You should
check if you don't keep references between pages - that would result
in 1+N pages (with N being the number of pages you reference in your
Use CSS for styling customization.
Piotr Jakubowski wrote:
Hi,
Is it possible to tell TabbedPanel where to put its inner elements and
override the default action? I would like to have the tab content in some
other place than it is usually. And I am thinking whether it is possible
Is there any reason why ResourceLink class in wicket 1.4 is a generic class,
since the parameter T isn't used at all?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/ResourceLink-question-tp21359819p21359819.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Wicket expects that FormInput would have a getter for devices. This happens
because you are using CompoundPropertyModel with your formthus the
wicket id is automatically used as a propertyModel on the form model object.
Alex Objelean
itayke wrote:
Hi,
I have this problem with my
There is an interesting article about some fancy ajax stuff. Here is the
article:
http://www.webresourcesdepot.com/load-content-while-scrolling-with-jquery/
I am curious about how this could be done the wicket way.
I hope, we'll end up with an interesting thread :)...
--
View this message in
I think community would be interested in this feature. Could you post the
code?
Marat Radchenko-2 wrote:
Wicket pages/components can be either stateful or stateless. Wicket
manages hem transparently and it is very easy to write any complex
page you want. Stateful pages are much more
Marat, as you can see people are interested and waiting for this feature
to be published somewhere
Alex
Marat Radchenko-2 wrote:
Wicket pages/components can be either stateful or stateless. Wicket
manages hem transparently and it is very easy to write any complex
page you want.
After reviewing the Wicket feature list, I accidentally noticed the following
statement:
The next version of Wicket will support client-side models for zero-state
scalability. I am wondering if this feature will be indeed implemented in
(which?) next version or this is just some feature which
. But there is no timeline for it.
-Matej
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 11:47 AM, Alex Objelean alex_objel...@yahoo.com
wrote:
After reviewing the Wicket feature list, I accidentally noticed the
following
statement:
The next version of Wicket will support client-side models for
zero-state
I've recently found this post on dzone:
http://java.dzone.com/news/this-time-last-year This time last year ...
What is your oppinion about this?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/%22This-time-last-year%22--is-Wicket-really-a-disappointment--tp18608440p18608440.html
prefer
JSF. Big players preffer the standard framework, it is still their
strong point. Maybe it is all about marketing?
pixologe wrote:
no not at all. it's great.
Alex Objelean wrote:
I've recently found this post on dzone:
http://java.dzone.com/news/this-time-last-year This time
marketability related statistics and is
not so popular between developers.
Alex Objelean wrote:
For the last 7 months I was working on a project using JSF (Icefaces). It
indeed have nice features, but still it does not compare at all with
Wicket (easy of componet development, flexibility, testability
There is Wicket in Action, Pro Wicket,
http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/newuserguide.html wiki page and other
resources... You can use any of them for your guideline.
freak182 wrote:
My superior ask me to submit a Guidelines in Wicket. He assign it to me
because I trained the new employee
I also like the approach of pushing every functionality in separate
components (Panels), it gives me the flexibility of composing pages with any
combination of this components. For instance, if I have Login functionality,
I create the LoginPanel and LoginPage. This approach allows me to add other
I'm interested in this subject too. Anyone?
Daniel Stoch-2 wrote:
Hi,
In Wicket by default IRequestCycleProcessor.respond(RuntimeException,
RequestCycle) method is called to handle runtime exceptions. In
AbstractRequestCycleProcessor this method throws
RestartResponseException (or
There are more threads about this issue...
In order to catch all runtime exception, you have to override default
RequestCycle (newRequestCycle method) in your application class and override
private Page handleRuntimeException(final Page page, final RuntimeException
e) method.
Alex Objelean
Sorry for mistake... I've updated the comment
aditsu wrote:
Thanks, but I can't find any handleRuntimeException method in any class.
I'm using wicket 1.4-m3.
Also, if the method is private, then how can I possibly override it?
Alex Objelean wrote:
There are more threads about
something
return new LoginPage();
}
[/CODE]
The above example will redirect you to the LoginPage if any runtime
exception occures.
aditsu wrote:
Ok, but how would that let me render the rest of the page?
Alex Objelean wrote:
There are more threads about this issue
runtime exception could make sense if the runtime exception is
thrown by some business logic you are invoking inside wicket components
but this kind of issue is your responsibility..
Alex Objelean
aditsu wrote:
Well, I'm specifically talking about unexpected runtime exceptions. I
don't
You probably want to use AjaxLink and when the link is clicked - add to the
target the link itself, in order to see the change.
miro wrote:
upon debugging i foundthe constructor MyLink() was getting called
afteronClick() so any changes I make in onClick to components
behaviour
If they would bookmark these url, they would get SessionExpired page... I'm
pretty sure they have tried to hack the url.
Alex Objelean
Thomas Singer-4 wrote:
Thanks, Alex. So you are sure this is no problem of our web application,
but
rather users who change such URLs manually or have
In your Application class add the following line:
getMarkupSettings().setStripWicketTags(true);
Martin Letendre wrote:
Don't display the wicket:panel tag
1- I am using a wicket panel to create a component here is the code.
wicket:panel
div
... some code
/div
Or you can update the settings in your Application class:
getApplicationSettings().setInternalErrorPage(HomePage.class);
Alex Objelean
Thomas Singer-4 wrote:
As I have reported a couple of weeks ago (but can't find the message any
more for a follow-up), Wicket shows an ugly internal-error
I've created a draft version of the page in wiki:
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WICKET/Wicket+and+localized+URLs
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WICKET/Wicket+and+localized+URLs
Now it will not expire ;).
Alex Objelean
Vytautas C(ivilis wrote:
Hi, Alex.
Could
404 page..
Alex Objelean
Thomas Singer-4 wrote:
Hi Linda, Alex and Jonas,
Thank you for your answers.
Just for the records: I'm now setting the internal error page in
WebApplication.init() as Alex suggested and override
WebApplication.newRequestCycle(Request, Response) to return
It is indeed a simple decorator of the Request object... nothing special..
Alex Objelean
Vytautas C(ivilis wrote:
Question regarding your code in wiki page: RequestDecorator, this seems
to be class in your package? Could it be posted too?
Regards,
Vytautas
Alex Objelean wrote
) is
called... and wicket doesn't remove the parameters from the url and mess
this up... The real problem is when you are trying to build an absolute url
for a ResourceReference. If this is indeed the reason of the problem, we
should raise a jira issue...
Alex Objelean
pieter claassen-2 wrote:
Ok
You could add a shared resource to your application, like this:
Application.get().getSharedResources().add(name, WebResource)... in the
WebResource implementation you can control the response headers by adding
expire headers or etag.. This is pretty clean approach.
Alex Objelean
Fernando
the mounted pages, the problem
went away).
Rgds,
Pieter
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 7:31 AM, Alex Objelean
alex_objel...@yahoo.comwrote:
I am pretty sure, it is a bug. The reason why the
urlFor(ResourceReference)
is not working properly is because you are using
Besides the servlet, there is also a wicket way of do it:
- Use shared resource, which is stateless and bookmarkable
If you need more informations about this approach, search on forum or just
ask... and I'll provide you with some examples of how I do it..
Alex Objelean
Peter Dotchev wrote
you to use directly an Image component, while the
second allows you to build the url of any resource by name..
Alex Objelean
Peter Dotchev wrote:
Hi Alex,
I check SharedResources, but as I understand it I would have to add there
a Resource object for each image.
After checking again
You can use HttpClient for this.
Alex Objelean
chocba wrote:
Thanks Igor. I'll give it a try. But the api doc says
redirectrequesttarget will only redirect to an external url, but I would
like to post the form, not just redirect.
igor.vaynberg wrote:
class myform extends form
? :)
Regards,
Alex Objelean
Pedro H. O. dos Santos wrote:
Hi Alex, don't you got the same impression than I, that it isn't an lazy
load panel? Looks more like an triggered load panel. I have a few in my
projects, and I using an strategy like have an page implementing
IAjaxIndicatorAware
I've done something similar. Using the SessionListener seems to be the only
one way to do the trick (only here you can access the session which is still
valid). And of course you can access your wicket strongly type session from
SessionListener: MySession.get().getUser().
Alex Objelean
That is why this Exception was created... you can override requestCycle
handle this kind of exception whatever you like ...
Alex Objelean
Marat Radchenko-2 wrote:
There some places in Wicket sources where it throws
InvalidUrlException that causes exception logging and
InternalErrorPage
1 - 100 of 248 matches
Mail list logo
