You do realize that there is a single instance of the Application, not one per
user, right? Your application holds an OrderDatabase and whenever a user
enters a new date range they are altering the contents of the Map in that
OrderDatabase. So user A sets a date range and fetch is called,
Have you tried prependJavascript(String) instead of append? Javadoc:
Adds javascript that will be evaluated on the client side before components
are replaced
Sounds like what you're looking for if I'm understanding your question
correctly.
Craig
_
From: Daniele Dellafiore
If your component is a MarkupContainer you can override
getAssociatedMarkupStream(boolean) and build the markup on the fly. So maybe
still have the HTML file that you read in as a template with some place holder
string and in the override you replace the place holder with stuff you want to
be
Didn't think of that approach, looks good. But to clear up my previous
suggestion since I guess I wasn't clear enough and its useful in other
situations also, you need to _override_ getAssociatedMarkupStream(boolean), not
just call it.
public static final String JAVASCRIPT_PLACEHOLDER =
Allow me to translate:
He tries auto complete example locally (under tomcat in windows) but isn't
presented with any auto complete suggestions. The example works for him online.
(I think... took a few reads)
Craig
_
From: nino martinez wael [mailto:nino.martinez.w...@gmail.com]
To:
Look at the source of the DynamicImageResource class. The getResourceState
method does something like (sorry for the lame pseudocode) 'if image data is
null then save and return value of getImageData else return the previous image
data'. So its gonna call your getImageData() method once and
IMO, looking up EJBs through JNDI is better than relying on injection. Make
the hostname (localhost, another ip, etc) part of the JNDI URL configurable and
you give yourself the flexibility of being able to deploy them locally or in
another VM. If you are using EJBs with JPA this will allow
-12-03 03:46 keltezéssel, McIlwee, Craig írta:
IMO, looking up EJBs through JNDI is better than relying on injection.
Make the hostname (localhost, another ip, etc) part of the JNDI URL
configurable and you give yourself the flexibility of being able to deploy them
locally or in another VM
I agree that you should have a strong reason to change the default, and IMO 'I
don't like it' isn't good enough. What happens if you want to reuse components
that live in that jar elsewhere? Putting the jar that contains the component
on the classpath won't be sufficient because you'll only
Really? I've never written applets before, is there some limitation that would
prevent it from being fetched as a shared resource? If not then add a
wicket:id attribute to the applet tag, create a Label with the same wicket ID,
and then use an AttributeModifier to create the code attribute on
So you want your page to output some content that doesn't live in
HomePage.html, but from memory/db/etc instead? If that's the case, overrride
hasAssociatedMarkup() and return false (tells wicket there's no HomePage.html
to look for) and then in onRender() write your content using
Only 1 per event will work because the script to trigger the behavior is
inlined on the element (input onclick='ajax call to a behavior's url' /).
CompoundAjaxBehavior was mentioned as a possible feature for wicket 1.5/2.0 at
the link below, but that was 2 years ago so I don't know how
I think you answered your own question, you said you wanted properties that
persisted through the session so store them in the session. Either create your
own subclass with setters/getters for your properties or you could possibly
open up the visibility of Session.setAttribute(String, Object).
Maybe wicket thinks that the ajax behavior belongs to a page that isn't the
current/active page and therefore is ignoring it?
http://wicket.apache.org/docs/1.4/org/apache/wicket/ajax/AbstractDefaultAjaxBehavior.html#getCallbackScript(boolean)
Just a guess, and I am likely to be wrong, but I
I've just noticed that CheckboxMultipleChoice uses isEnabled() when rendering,
but I think most other form components use isEnabledInHierarchy(). I like that
most of the form components use the hierarchy method because it allows me to
create a read only version of my forms by disabling the
I doubt it's a problem, but if you're worried about the class reference you can
introduce a middle man that will handle the serialization as a string:
class ClassHolder implements Serializable {
private Class? clazz;
// constructor, setter, and getter omitted...
private void
I doubt this is a wicket problem, I can redirect all logging for each of my
wars to their own file with no trouble.
First, what slf4j implementation are you using?
Second, have a look at this page:
http://www.jboss.org/community/wiki/Log4jRepositorySelector. I know that its
for JBoss,
Have you tried using firebug to see what the POSTed values are? That may shed
some light on the problem...
_
From: victorTrapiello [mailto:vic...@trapiello.net]
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Sent: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 02:19:29 -0400
Subject: Re: PROBLEM WITH PAY PAL INTEGRATION
that´s is
There's a good reason that markup ID doesn't match wicket ID. If I have a
panel with a few form components, and then put 2 of those panels on the same
page, then your approach would break things like document.getElementId(...)
because there would be more than 1 element w/ same ID.
Craig
As long as you prevent the browser from caching the page with the form (just
the page itself, caching the resources is fine) then when the user hits back
wicket will pull the old page instance from the pagemap and rerender it. That
page instance is the same one that was used the first time, so
Don't have any code handy right now, but I've used this before for jasper
reports and it worked out well
http://wicket-stuff.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/wicket-stuff/trunk/wicket-contrib-jasperreports/
- Original Message -
From: chinedu efoagui
[mailto:chinedub...@gmail.com]
To: users
Like Pierre said, component.setMarkupId(component.getId()) will work, but it
was discussed just a couple of weeks ago why that's a bad approach. The thread
isn't appearing on nabble though, not sure why that is. Anyway, a safer
approach (to prevent duplicate ID issues) is to generate your
Not quite true. What I've done is the past is record my tests w/ the IDE then
export to Java. Once you've got the JUnit generated for you it's not too hard
to take a quick pass and convert all of the ID lookups to XPath lookups. If
you know for sure when writing the test that the ID really
23 matches
Mail list logo
