hi
Just a question, about this suggestion :
wicket:composernormal html or wicket
componentswicket:composedComponentnormal html or wicket components
/wicket:composer
Is it completely far off or could it be interesting ? What do you think of
it ?
thanks in advance
++
--
View this message in
igor.vaynberg wrote:
you cant because it wont have any markup to attach to, instead you can
simply output the messages yourself, see my reply to this thread:
Thanks a lot Igor
However, I'm a bit upset not to be able to use other components in a
Behavior, it kind of breaks the Wicket way
igor.vaynberg wrote:
exactly how does this break the wicket way?
behaviors are meant to augment rendering of components
-igor
I hope the wording wasn't offensive, it wasn't the aim at all.
back to the topic : here, instead of using a feedback panel (which was
exactly what was
However, I'm a bit upset not to be able to use other components in a
Behavior, it kind of breaks the Wicket way of doing things.
exactly how does this break the wicket way?
behaviors are meant to augment rendering of components
-igor
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 2:28 PM, ZedroS
you cant because it wont have any markup to attach to, instead you can
simply output the messages yourself, see my reply to this thread:
Form Components With Built In Feedback
-igor
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 6:04 PM, ZedroS zedros.schwa...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
I'm using a behaviour to add
