Re: Is wicket suited for my needs?

2011-02-16 Thread Suraj Chandran
Thanks a lot for all your input. Thanks, Suraj. On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 5:18 AM, Eelco Hillenius eelco.hillen...@gmail.comwrote: My aim would be to push requests towards statelessness as much as possible. Noticing this some guys have told me that maybe wicket is not for this. Considering

Re: Is wicket suited for my needs?

2011-02-15 Thread Martijn Dashorst
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 8:27 AM, Suraj Chandran suraj.chand...@ny.email.gs.com wrote: 10K concurrent sessions. That really is not a problem IMO. If you have a 2GB heap: you probably should reserve 1GB for request processing, and 1GB for session/cache/etc storage. However, memory is not that

Re: Is wicket suited for my needs?

2011-02-15 Thread Jonathan Locke
I don't think we even have an option to order servers with fewer than 8 cores and 16GB of RAM at my day job. I think our minimum spec could easily handle twice that load (20K sessions) on a single box. And the web tier scales out very easily. Want more sessions, buy more boxes. I would not be

Re: Is wicket suited for my needs?

2011-02-15 Thread Eelco Hillenius
My aim would be to push requests towards statelessness as much as possible. Noticing this some guys have told me that maybe wicket is not for this. Considering that atleast 20% of the requests will be session based, do you suggest using wicket. You should also consider why you want to use

Re: Is wicket suited for my needs?

2011-02-14 Thread Jonathan Locke
10K concurrent *requests* or sessions? -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Is-wicket-suited-for-my-needs-tp3305543p3306071.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Is wicket suited for my needs?

2011-02-14 Thread Suraj Chandran
I understand that wicket is a stateful session based framework, but there is still provision for stateless stuff. My aim would be to push requests towards statelessness as much as possible. Noticing this some guys have told me that maybe wicket is not for this. Considering that atleast 20% of

Re: Is wicket suited for my needs?

2011-02-14 Thread Jeremy Thomerson
As Jonathan asked, did you really mean 10k concurrent *requests* (which is what you stated originally), or did you mean 10k concurrent *sessions*? -- Jeremy Thomerson http://wickettraining.com *Need a CMS for Wicket? Use Brix! http://brixcms.org* On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 11:31 PM, Suraj

Re: Is wicket suited for my needs?

2011-02-14 Thread Suraj Chandran
10K concurrent sessions. Thanks, Suraj. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org