Hello,
It is very interesting to have a wicket blog,
but for me even more interesting would be a cms based on wicket
that integrates very smoothly into an existing wicket webapp.
At the moment we use typo3 together with our java webapp.
Would be nice to have a solution where everything is java
http://code.google.com/p/brix-cms/
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 9:54 AM, Bernhard Grünewaldt
bernh...@gruenewaldt.net wrote:
Hello,
It is very interesting to have a wicket blog,
but for me even more interesting would be a cms based on wicket
Found it myself.
Anyone have experience with brix?
http://code.google.com/p/brix-cms/
Bernhard Grünewaldt schrieb:
Hello,
It is very interesting to have a wicket blog,
but for me even more interesting would be a cms based on wicket
that integrates very smoothly into an existing wicket
Have you seen Brix ?? http://code.google.com/p/brix-cms/
Daniel
Bernhard Grünewaldt wrote:
Hello,
It is very interesting to have a wicket blog,
but for me even more interesting would be a cms based on wicket
that integrates very smoothly into an existing wicket webapp.
At the
I added this and a couple of other projects to the wiki, since it
seems to come up all the time...
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WICKET/Related+Projects+and+Tools
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 5:01 PM, Jeremy Thomerson
jer...@wickettraining.com wrote:
http://code.google.com/p/brix-cms/
Hi Erik,
this was already on this list:
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WICKET/Products+based+on+Wicket
As it is a product and not a tool...
it is a project, but not one that is a extension to wicket...
ok, I understand that everyone thinks different about the lists
Quoting
Hi Ralph,
Right, I'd glossed over that. I have to say though that the
disctinction between the two lists seems a bit arbitrary to me. For
instance, the 'Vocus student information system' and 'Finan' (which
are not available to the public) are on the 'products' list along with
Brix CMS, even
I fully agree with you.
Daniel
Erik Post-5 wrote:
Hi Ralph,
Right, I'd glossed over that. I have to say though that the
disctinction between the two lists seems a bit arbitrary to me. For
.
immediately evident, but I would peronally prefer a list of sites/apps
that showcase
