Brian,
Why don´t you look at how things have been implemented for other
libraries (e.g. jquery UI). Can you give a concrete example of
component you want to integrate that is giving you problems?
And the strict Wicket component to markup structure is frustrating
because ExtJS 4 builds
First, thanks for the prompt response.
Okay, so I am struggling with writing a menu component. I saw the
Suckerfish menu example and tried to adapt that towards my needs. I
want my fellow developers to be able to write something like:
MyMenu topMenu = new MyMenu(topMenu);
MyMenu subMenu1 = new
interface.
- Original Message -
From: Brian Mulholland
Sent: 10/24/11 05:41 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Wicket and ExtJS
First, thanks for the prompt response. Okay, so I am struggling with writing a
menu component. I saw the Suckerfish menu example and tried to adapt
there have been plenty of discussions on wicket and extjs
http://markmail.org/search/wicket+extjs
my two cents is that this kind of integration is not a good idea.
wicket is about manipulating existing markup in an object oriented
way, while extjs is about generating the markup from code. there
I have a simple demo of the guestbook application. I'll post it online in
the next couple of days.
On Feb 7, 2008 10:54 PM, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes it's normal practice to make a simple project that demonstrates the
functionality... Like
There is no HomePage.java because this is not a wicket application. It is a
library that you can use in your applications. If you want to use it you
can compile it by downloading the source and then compiling with: mvn
compile, or you can just add the following lines to your applications POM
and
Yeah,
If you look at the comments I credited the author.
-Jeremy
On Feb 6, 2008 9:19 PM, Ryan Sonnek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Glancing through the javadocs, that JavascriptBuilder class looks
awefully familiar. i'm assuming you've seen the
wicketstuff-scriptaculous project? =)
On Wed,
Yes, that's because I used the wicket archetype to create the project
originally. I'll remove TestHomePage.java.
Thanks for the catch!
-Jeremy
On Feb 7, 2008 1:06 PM, Flemming Boller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
Yes, but in your test class (TestHomePage.java) you reference
HomePage.class
Hi
I have tried it a little bit, but I think you have forgot to include some
source files. Like HomePage.java.
/FLemming
On Feb 7, 2008 4:02 AM, Jeremy Fergason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All,
I've been trying to use the ExtJS forms from within wicket. It seemed
that
several people out
Hi
Yes, but in your test class (TestHomePage.java) you reference HomePage.class
That was why I mentioned it.
/FLemming
On Feb 7, 2008 8:35 PM, Jeremy Fergason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is no HomePage.java because this is not a wicket application. It is
a
library that you can use in
I think you should add HomePage, or something like that, so users can see
how to use this library.
It is not easy to guess that for example many of the components shall not be
in the markup
when using this library, at least for the normal wicket user.
Anyhow I found out that the ExtJS is a
Yes it's normal practice to make a simple project that demonstrates the
functionality... Like
http://wicket-stuff.svn.sf.net/svnroot/wicket-stuff/trunk/wicket-contrib-accordion-examples/
etc.. It usually does not take that long to construct and, is very good
for users to learn from.
On Wed, 2008-02-06 at 20:02 -0700, Jeremy Fergason wrote:
All,
I've been trying to use the ExtJS forms from within wicket. It seemed that
several people out there were trying to do this with limited success; except
for the occasional person saying they had done it. I have got the
13 matches
Mail list logo
