Re: Wicket with X-editable

2014-03-14 Thread Jered Myers
Thanks for your response.  I agree, it looks like it would be easy to 
implement.  I will likely have to fork X-editable and add custom code 
for my needs (not just Wicket integration), so I am curious if anybody 
has actually used this and run into problems.


On 03/10/2014 10:21 PM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro wrote:

IMHO this should be very easy to implement/integrate with  Wicket: judging
from the documentation. I haven't used the library myself, so I might be
missing some nuances/caveats...


On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 12:03 AM, Jered Myers
wrote:


Has anybody tried to work with Wicket and X-editable (
http://vitalets.github.io/x-editable/index.html)?  If so, what was your
experience (e.g. X-editable stability, difficulty to implement, etc.)?  I
am curious if it would be a good idea to go down the road of making my
Wicket application run with the X-editable in-line editable fields.

--
Jered Myers







-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org



Re: Wicket with X-editable

2014-03-10 Thread Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
IMHO this should be very easy to implement/integrate with  Wicket: judging
from the documentation. I haven't used the library myself, so I might be
missing some nuances/caveats...


On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 12:03 AM, Jered Myers
wrote:

> Has anybody tried to work with Wicket and X-editable (
> http://vitalets.github.io/x-editable/index.html)?  If so, what was your
> experience (e.g. X-editable stability, difficulty to implement, etc.)?  I
> am curious if it would be a good idea to go down the road of making my
> Wicket application run with the X-editable in-line editable fields.
>
> --
> Jered Myers
>
>


-- 
Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro