Re: idiosyncratic interfaces such as IModel, IVisitor
What is idiosyncratic interface ? P.S. Sorry, I don't want to google it... On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 11:08 AM, IO niezus...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi, in Wicket there are many idiosyncratic interfaces, such as IModel T. I often see that these interfaces are implemented several times in a project. An idiosyncratic interface should be implemented only once in a project. Can someone explain that to me? IO. -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/idiosyncratic-interfaces-such-as-IModel-IVisitor-tp3613440p3613440.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org -- Martin Grigorov jWeekend Training, Consulting, Development http://jWeekend.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: idiosyncratic interfaces such as IModel, IVisitor
Not sure what you're getting at. IModel is sort of hungarian notation: Interface for Model. Not idiosyncratic. Read the definition of Idiosyncratic Interfaces: If a general interface is implemented by only one class (whose implementation may be modified over time, but with no two alternatives occurring in the same project), we call this interface idiosyncratic. The corollary is when multiple implementations exist of one interface, it is a Family Interface or general interface according to [1]. Just because one article suggests that all things named IFoo are idiosyncratic, doesn't mean it is the truth... Martijn [1] http://www.jot.fm/issues/issue_2005_07/article1/ On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 10:08 AM, IO niezus...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi, in Wicket there are many idiosyncratic interfaces, such as IModel T. I often see that these interfaces are implemented several times in a project. An idiosyncratic interface should be implemented only once in a project. Can someone explain that to me? IO. -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/idiosyncratic-interfaces-such-as-IModel-IVisitor-tp3613440p3613440.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org -- Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: idiosyncratic interfaces such as IModel, IVisitor
Am 21.06.2011 10:08, schrieb IO: Hi, in Wicket there are many idiosyncratic interfaces, such as IModelT. I often see that these interfaces are implemented several times in a project. An idiosyncratic interface should be implemented only once in a project. Can someone explain that to me? IO. -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/idiosyncratic-interfaces-such-as-IModel-IVisitor-tp3613440p3613440.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org What are interfaces for? Hiding implementation details and define a contract? What is idiosyncratic? Or do you mean generic? Cheers Mike - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: idiosyncratic interfaces such as IModel, IVisitor
I have expressed myself wrong. In the interface-based programming, general interfaces are classified into family interfaces and idiosyncratic interfaces. I looked up again and noticed that the word idiosyncratic is used only in Germany. Can anyone else tell me what the I stands for the interfaces? -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/idiosyncratic-interfaces-such-as-IModel-IVisitor-tp3613440p3613488.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: idiosyncratic interfaces such as IModel, IVisitor
Ok thank you. That has answered my question. -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/idiosyncratic-interfaces-such-as-IModel-IVisitor-tp3613440p3613492.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: idiosyncratic interfaces such as IModel, IVisitor
An interface is a piece of code one writes when they are too lazy to think of the implementation. An abstract Class is one where you have no idea how the hell you will complete the rest! An idiosyncratic interface is 1 to 1 relation with your class because the programmer did not have the guts to stand by his class and use it as a type directly (Interface as a Type) :) - Software documentation is like sex: when it is good, it is very, very good; and when it is bad, it is still better than nothing! -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/idiosyncratic-interfaces-such-as-IModel-IVisitor-tp3613440p3613551.html Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
