Re: problem at startup
I think an mvn clean compile will solve this. Maarten On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 9:14 PM, Sergiy Yevtushenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Timo Rantalaiho wrote: Me too. Probably it worth to report the issue to Sun, because it looks like JVM issue. Or searching in the Bug parade, in the early 1.5.0_x versions there are a lot of bugs that are fixed later. What JVM version are you using? java version 1.6.0_06 Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_06-b02) Java HotSpot(TM) Server VM (build 10.0-b22, mixed mode) Regards, Sergiy. *- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://es.os2.ru/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: problem at startup
Maarten Bosteels wrote: I think an mvn clean compile will solve this. It doesn't. I've tried this as well as many other things including fresh wicket sources install from svn. Also, the issue is reproducible with quickstart (with obvious change in pom.xml - adding of proper compiler version) using mvn jetty:run. Regards, Sergiy. *- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://es.os2.ru/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: problem at startup
Igor Vaynberg wrote: we removed those methods because they are declared in java.util.map IValueMap extends MapString, Object and map has Object putString,Object so i dont see why it wouldnt find the method... Me too. Probably it worth to report the issue to Sun, because it looks like JVM issue. Regards, Sergiy. *- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://es.os2.ru/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: problem at startup
On Fri, 27 Jun 2008, Sergiy Yevtushenko wrote: Me too. Probably it worth to report the issue to Sun, because it looks like JVM issue. Or searching in the Bug parade, in the early 1.5.0_x versions there are a lot of bugs that are fixed later. What JVM version are you using? Best wishes, Timo -- Timo Rantalaiho Reaktor Innovations OyURL: http://www.ri.fi/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: problem at startup
Timo Rantalaiho wrote: Me too. Probably it worth to report the issue to Sun, because it looks like JVM issue. Or searching in the Bug parade, in the early 1.5.0_x versions there are a lot of bugs that are fixed later. What JVM version are you using? java version 1.6.0_06 Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_06-b02) Java HotSpot(TM) Server VM (build 10.0-b22, mixed mode) Regards, Sergiy. *- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://es.os2.ru/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: problem at startup
what version are you on? -igor On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 12:34 PM, Sergiy Yevtushenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, At some point after refreshing wicket sources to latest from repository, I started getting following error at jetty startup: ... java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: org.apache.wicket.util.value.IValueMap.put(Ljava/lang/String;Ljava/lang/Object;)Ljava/lang/Object; at org.apache.wicket.markup.parser.XmlTag.put(XmlTag.java:454) at org.apache.wicket.markup.parser.XmlPullParser.parseTagText(XmlPullParser.java:635) at org.apache.wicket.markup.parser.XmlPullParser.next(XmlPullParser.java:288) at org.apache.wicket.markup.parser.XmlPullParser.nextTag(XmlPullParser.java:423) at org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.WicketFilter.getFilterPath(WicketFilter.java:682) at org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.WicketFilter.init(WicketFilter.java:519) (jetty part skipped) ... Is it a known issue or I met something new? Regards, Sergiy. *- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://es.os2.ru/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: problem at startup
Igor Vaynberg wrote: what version are you on? I've resolved the issue by rolling back IValueMap.java from latest 669997 to previous 660341. Differences between these two versions are following: ... --- IValueMap.java.660341 2008-06-26 23:54:09.0 +0300 +++ IValueMap.java.669997 2008-06-27 07:57:07.0 +0300 @@ -35,11 +35,6 @@ public interface IValueMap extends MapString, Object { /** -* @see java.util.Map#clear() -*/ - void clear(); - - /** * Retrieves a codeboolean/code value by key. * * @param key @@ -205,21 +200,6 @@ IValueMap makeImmutable(); /** -* @see java.util.Map#put(Object, Object) -*/ - Object put(final String key, final Object value); - - /** -* @see java.util.Map#putAll(java.util.Map) -*/ - void putAll(final Map map); - - /** -* @see java.util.Map#remove(java.lang.Object) -*/ - Object remove(final Object key); - - /** * Provided that the hash key is a codeString/code and you need to access the value * ignoring the key's case (upper- or lowercase letters), then you may use this method to get * the correct writing. ... Regards, Sergiy. *- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://es.os2.ru/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: problem at startup
we removed those methods because they are declared in java.util.map IValueMap extends MapString, Object and map has Object putString,Object so i dont see why it wouldnt find the method... -igor On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 10:01 PM, Sergiy Yevtushenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Igor Vaynberg wrote: what version are you on? I've resolved the issue by rolling back IValueMap.java from latest 669997 to previous 660341. Differences between these two versions are following: ... --- IValueMap.java.660341 2008-06-26 23:54:09.0 +0300 +++ IValueMap.java.669997 2008-06-27 07:57:07.0 +0300 @@ -35,11 +35,6 @@ public interface IValueMap extends MapString, Object { /** -* @see java.util.Map#clear() -*/ - void clear(); - - /** * Retrieves a codeboolean/code value by key. * * @param key @@ -205,21 +200,6 @@ IValueMap makeImmutable(); /** -* @see java.util.Map#put(Object, Object) -*/ - Object put(final String key, final Object value); - - /** -* @see java.util.Map#putAll(java.util.Map) -*/ - void putAll(final Map map); - - /** -* @see java.util.Map#remove(java.lang.Object) -*/ - Object remove(final Object key); - - /** * Provided that the hash key is a codeString/code and you need to access the value * ignoring the key's case (upper- or lowercase letters), then you may use this method to get * the correct writing. ... Regards, Sergiy. *- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://es.os2.ru/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]