Re: setObject( ), getObject( )

2008-10-21 Thread Scott Swank
However setObject() doesn't work as well on AbstractReadOnlyModel as it does on Model, which is particularly important for immutable backing objects such as Strings. On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 2:35 AM, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: we have also AbstractReadOnlyModel for that so igor are

Re: setObject( ), getObject( )

2008-10-21 Thread James Carman
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 11:02 AM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: whenever there is something nonfinal people will always find a way to misuse it. model methods are not final because it gives you a simple base class to subclass instead of starting from scratch with an imodel. Right.

Re: setObject( ), getObject( )

2008-10-20 Thread Igor Vaynberg
whenever there is something nonfinal people will always find a way to misuse it. model methods are not final because it gives you a simple base class to subclass instead of starting from scratch with an imodel. -igor On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 6:37 AM, Ricky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Is