Re: wicket-extensions alive?
Thank you JT, the day I was working on this when I checked the maven repository, the first search result returns the older versions of wicket-extensions based off the groupid = wicket. It was my mistake, I didn't realize at the time there was a newer branch based off groupid = org.apache.wicket, but your response forced me to do a sanity-check and go back to the maven repo. Thank You. -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/wicket-extensions-alive-tp2324725p2335894.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: wicket-extensions alive?
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 2:46 PM, gnugrf gnu...@sdf.lonestar.org wrote: ok, I had read that in a post from several years ago, it just didnt make sense to me, because I thought alive and well would mean that is has some ability to work with a more current version of wicket. a bit misleading first response. What do you mean? It is alive and well - the current version, that is. You're using version 1.2.7 which is YEARS old. -- Jeremy Thomerson http://www.wickettraining.com
Re: wicket-extensions alive?
ok, I had read that in a post from several years ago, it just didnt make sense to me, because I thought alive and well would mean that is has some ability to work with a more current version of wicket. a bit misleading first response. -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/wicket-extensions-alive-tp2324725p2327366.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: wicket-extensions alive?
extensions is alive and well, use it every day. -igor On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 1:34 PM, gnugrf gnu...@sdf.lonestar.org wrote: I had added wicket-extensions to my pom.xml, because I was planning on making use of DataTable and DefaultDataTable, however, I hadn't yet added any code that would require the dependency. Made a couple changes to my project over the weekend, and went to recompile and tomcat wouldnt start. Checked the logs and was greeted with: Invocation of init method failed; nested exception is java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/apache/commons/collections/map/LRUMap. After trial and error removing some code...I finally removed the dependency (needle in a haystack), and all the errors went away. Q1- Is wicket-extensions alive and well? The wicket docs are still referencing the library, so I'm guessing yes, even though it seems a couple years since an update. Q2- If it is alive, can anybody tell me whats going on with the errors im having? -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/wicket-extensions-alive-tp2324725p2324725.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: wicket-extensions alive?
That's not a wicket class. You're missing commons-collections.jar On Aug 13, 2010 4:34 PM, gnugrf gnu...@sdf.lonestar.org wrote: I had added wicket-extensions to my pom.xml, because I was planning on making use of DataTable and DefaultDataTable, however, I hadn't yet added any code that would require the dependency. Made a couple changes to my project over the weekend, and went to recompile and tomcat wouldnt start. Checked the logs and was greeted with: Invocation of init method failed; nested exception is java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/apache/commons/collections/map/LRUMap. After trial and error removing some code...I finally removed the dependency (needle in a haystack), and all the errors went away. Q1- Is wicket-extensions alive and well? The wicket docs are still referencing the library, so I'm guessing yes, even though it seems a couple years since an update. Q2- If it is alive, can anybody tell me whats going on with the errors im having? -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/wicket-extensions-alive-tp2324725p2324725.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: wicket-extensions alive?
Yeah I noticed that when I checked the maven repo that it required commons-collections, so I tried adding version 3.2.1. I ended up with the following error: java.lang.ClassCastException: wicket.extensions.Initializer cannot be cast to org.apache.wicket.IInitializer The maven repo stated that wicket-extensions required commons-collections 2.1, so I thought maybe it required an older version...same error. I went as far as checking my local .m2 repo to make sure I didnt have a corrupted .jar - which has happened to me before. The jar opens, able to see the LRUmap.class file, so I am at a loss.. Is the dependency right? -- dependency groupIdwicket/groupId artifactIdwicket-extensions/artifactId version1.2.7/version /dependency I noticed that all the other wicket-related stuff is under groupId org.apache.wicket. Googling around I found someone had this same error awhile back using inconsistent versions of wicket and wicket-spring, but that is definitely not the case here. -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/wicket-extensions-alive-tp2324725p2324894.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Re: wicket-extensions alive?
extensions version should be the same as wicket, so unless you are using wicket-1.2.7 you are using the wrong version. -igor On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 5:09 PM, gnugrf gnu...@sdf.lonestar.org wrote: Yeah I noticed that when I checked the maven repo that it required commons-collections, so I tried adding version 3.2.1. I ended up with the following error: java.lang.ClassCastException: wicket.extensions.Initializer cannot be cast to org.apache.wicket.IInitializer The maven repo stated that wicket-extensions required commons-collections 2.1, so I thought maybe it required an older version...same error. I went as far as checking my local .m2 repo to make sure I didnt have a corrupted .jar - which has happened to me before. The jar opens, able to see the LRUmap.class file, so I am at a loss.. Is the dependency right? -- dependency groupIdwicket/groupId artifactIdwicket-extensions/artifactId version1.2.7/version /dependency I noticed that all the other wicket-related stuff is under groupId org.apache.wicket. Googling around I found someone had this same error awhile back using inconsistent versions of wicket and wicket-spring, but that is definitely not the case here. -- View this message in context: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/wicket-extensions-alive-tp2324725p2324894.html Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
