Re: [xwiki-users] [xwiki-devs] XWiki Logo Challenge, Round 2

2010-04-14 Thread Denis Gervalle
> > IMO it's a bit too late to give -1 for a logo that passed the first > round. Is it less readable now? > > 16 was voted by 11 community members (including myself) in the first > round. Do we count less than "people from outside the project"? If we > want a community-chosen logo then we should le

Re: [xwiki-users] [xwiki-devs] XWiki Logo Challenge, Round 2

2010-04-14 Thread Vincent Massol
On Apr 13, 2010, at 3:39 PM, Marius Dumitru Florea wrote: > Hi all, > > Guillaume Lerouge wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 00:41, Ludovic Dubost wrote: >> >>> +1 for 4A >>> >>> and I'm at this point very -1 on 16 because of the W which has a missing >>> arm.. >>> I can't read XWik

Re: [xwiki-users] [xwiki-devs] XWiki Logo Challenge, Round 2

2010-04-14 Thread Valdis Vītoliņš
Readability is better, but for me upper right backgoing "serif" for w seems unnecessary. In place of (ascii art): \// \ /\\/\/iki only in this way: \/ /\\/\/iki Then X can be bigger and w can be aligned with k. What do you think? Valdis > I completely agree with Marius, I would also add tha

[xwiki-users] Quoting in macro calls

2010-04-14 Thread stefan bachert
Hi, I tried to call a macro passing a text which contains both, single and double qoutes {{macro para='this is "Developer's Guide" in german' /}} {{macro para="this is "Developer's Guide" in german" /}} Both way fails because either quote or apostroph needs to be escaped. I tried usual technics

Re: [xwiki-users] [xwiki-devs] XWiki Logo Challenge, Round 2

2010-04-14 Thread Raluca Stavro
Hi all, How about this alternative: http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/download/Community/LogoChallengeRound2/16-variation.png. I think that the W is readable now. Raluca. On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 11:06 AM, Valdis Vītoliņš wrote: > Readability is better, but for me upper right backgoing "serif"  for

Re: [xwiki-users] Quoting in macro calls

2010-04-14 Thread Thomas Mortagne
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 10:44, stefan bachert wrote: > Hi, > > I tried to call a macro passing a text which contains both, single and double > qoutes > > {{macro para='this is "Developer's Guide" in german' /}} > {{macro para="this is "Developer's Guide" in german" /}} > > Both way fails because

Re: [xwiki-users] TWiki Syntax HTML

2010-04-14 Thread Thomas Mortagne
Hi, On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 19:56, Meng Wu wrote: > Hey all, > > The TWiki syntax doesn't seem to fully support HTML elements like , , > , and links (they aren't rendered at all or rendered incorrectly). > However, basic syntax minus these tags such as , bullets, etc, > work. Enabling these HT

Re: [xwiki-users] [xwiki-devs] XWiki Logo Challenge, Round 2

2010-04-14 Thread Trevor Russ
I don't particularly like the recent alternative suggestions, the "w" is either getting unwieldy or too wide, losing its original impact, and I'd drop my +1 for it in those cases. To add my "hack", what if: a) the "X" was made bigger and put "behind" the "Wiki" part b) the "w" was a full W (stra

[xwiki-users] getURL returns full URL with 'http://' prefix on a virtual site

2010-04-14 Thread Colesnicov Eugen
When I address XWiki on a virtual site from outside the local net, the function getURL returns a full string prefixed with 'http://'. If I work from the local net with its true URL (http://server:8080/xwiki), this function returns short URL beginning with '/xwiki/'. As a result of this, the stan

[xwiki-users] Reverse proxy problems

2010-04-14 Thread Gerhard Esterhuizen
Hi, I recently deployed XWiki Enterprise behind an Apache HTTP server acting as a reverse proxy. This was done in order to map the XWiki web interface into our intranet namespace and to perform SSL termination. To get this working, I had to resort to a few hacks and workarounds due to the fact tha

Re: [xwiki-users] [xwiki-devs] XWiki Logo Challenge, Round 2

2010-04-14 Thread Marius Dumitru Florea
Trevor Russ wrote: > I don't particularly like the recent alternative suggestions, the "w" is > either getting unwieldy or too wide, losing its original impact, and I'd drop > my +1 for it in those cases. > > To add my "hack", what if: > a) the "X" was made bigger and put "behind" the "Wiki" par