I was once told by a very experienced engineer, involved in wind turbine design, that the energy used to manufacture all these devices can actually exceed the energy they will produce over their lifetimes. I haven't worked any numbers out for myself, but it would be interesting to see if he is right or not.

John F-L


----- Original Message ----- From: "James R. Frysinger" <j...@metricmethods.com>
To: "U.S. Metric Association" <usma@colostate.edu>
Sent: Saturday, September 05, 2009 1:27 AM
Subject: [USMA:45736] Re: [Fwd: Energy and power]



Right you are, John! I had the conversion factor for watt hour in my head and forgot to apply the value for the prefix.

Ah, well, if Rich Leventhal picks up on that we'll know that he's done some studying. And if he replies, I'll give him that correction.

The hype on this device is what you say and more. This is what drives me nuts about the wind and solar energy crowd. They love to quote peak values with no mention of the calm spells and night hours. If the difficulties of integrating such sporadic sources into the distribution grid are addressed at all, they are mentioned only in passing. By the time one looks at storage needs to smooth out the "wrinkles", the capital costs rise many times over the advertised capitalization figures for the raw devices.

As Kermit said, "It's not easy being green."

Jim

John M. Steele wrote:
Jim,
You missed a factor of 1000 somewhere. 1 kWh is 1000 W for 3600 s, hence 3.6 MJ. In a drivethru application, this might hit 2 kW instantaneous power, but the window will have a significant transaction time severely limiting the average power. He, of course, may have slightly different numbers, but my estimates are an average vehicle with mass 2.5 t, driver accelerates to 2 m/s in a stop-and-go line and needs to stop at the window, where he will have a 60 s transaction to receive his food, pay, receive change
 Kinetic energy, (½mv²)  is
0.5* 2500 kg * (2 m/s)² = 5000 J
If the car stops in 2 s, 2500 W would be generated during that period. However, with a 60 s transaction at the window, the average power is 5000 J/60 s = 80 W more or less. Even this (useless) level of power assumes 100% efficiency, so real world results will be lower. Assuming a line of cars awaiting their turn at the window, perhaps one device for each waiting position in line could improve this somewhat. I don't see it making a lot of power. Especially if anyone is stopped in the wrong place and everybody has to use their real brakes.

--- On *Fri, 9/4/09, James R. Frysinger /<j...@metricmethods.com>/* wrote:


    From: James R. Frysinger <j...@metricmethods.com>
    Subject: [USMA:45733] [Fwd: Energy and power]
    To: "U.S. Metric Association" <usma@colostate.edu>
    Date: Friday, September 4, 2009, 2:44 PM


    I recently posted this email to Rick Leventhal at FoxNews.com.

    Jim

    Dear Mr. Leventhal,

    I have just finished reading your online article
        N.J. Burger King Testing Energy-Producing Speed Bump
        http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,546512,00.html
    posted on FoxNews.com.

In this article you have made an error that detracts significantly from
    your report. You apparently confused the two distinctly different
    quantities energy and power. Power is the rate at which energy is
    produced, used, or transferred. Think "power equals energy divided by
    time". Conversely, "energy equals power times time".

    In your article you state, "That force turns gears inside, generating
    2000 watts of electricity instantaneously, according to the engineers
    who designed it." The implication is that some amount of electrical
energy is produced in a short period of time. But energy is measured in joules (J), not in watts (W). In the electrical utility industry, they often use kilowatt hours to measure energy; a kilowatt hour is equal to
    3600 joules, or 3.6 kilojoules (kJ).

The watt (W) is used to measure power. It is defined to be 1 J/s. Let's assume that object 1 transfers 1000 joules (1000 J) of energy over the time span of 1 second (1 s) to object 2 and this generates electricity with 100 % efficiency. The power of this generation event would then be 1000 J divided by 1 s or 1000 W. If instead the transfer of energy and energy production took 0.5 seconds, the power level would be 2000 W. Or if the transfer and generation took 2 seconds, the power level would be 500 W. All of these would of course be the average power levels during the time span of the interaction; between interactions the power level
    would be zero.

The way you should have worded your sentence would be of the form, "That
    force turns gears inside, generating an average of 2000 watts of
electrical power during the time span of the energy transfer, according
    to the engineers who designed it."

    The website for New Energy Technology states:
        "All vehicles in motion possess kinetic energy. The amount of
    kinetic
energy a vehicle possesses is based upon the vehicle’s speed and weight.
    The faster the vehicle is moving and the more it weighs, the more
    kinetic energy it possesses."
It would have been more informative if you had given us a typical value for interaction time and the power produced during that span of time OR
    a typical value for the amount of kinetic energy delivered and the
    amount of electrical energy produced for some typical car and speed
    circumstance.

    I encourage you to study the difference between energy and power, and
    the units used to report them, before writing anything else that uses
    them in the discussion.

    regards,
    /s/

    -- James R. Frysinger
    632 Stony Point Mountain Road
    Doyle, TN 38559-3030

    (C) 931.212.0267
    (H) 931.657.3107
    (F) 931.657.3108





    -- James R. Frysinger
    632 Stony Point Mountain Road
    Doyle, TN 38559-3030

    (C) 931.212.0267
    (H) 931.657.3107
    (F) 931.657.3108


--
James R. Frysinger
632 Stony Point Mountain Road
Doyle, TN 38559-3030

(C) 931.212.0267
(H) 931.657.3107
(F) 931.657.3108


Reply via email to