[USRP-users] Web server on E310

2017-07-17 Thread Steve Ringwald via USRP-users
Hi, I’m currently running a C++ application on the E310 which sends/receives some data to a client through TCP. Instead, I’d like to run a web server on the E310 so that a client could connect with a browser to a site with a basic GUI, and the C++ program would interact with the server instead o

[USRP-users] TwinRx not recieving waveform

2017-07-17 Thread Brandon Dunn via USRP-users
Hello,I am fairly new to usrp's and i am having troubles getting a waveform from a x310 with one TwinRX daughterboard acting as a receiver. I am using 2 signal generators to generate the waveform. My UHD version is 3.10.something (the newest auto-downloaded version). I am using GNU-radio to show

Re: [USRP-users] ֻC API questions

2017-07-17 Thread Martin Braun via USRP-users
On 07/16/2017 12:54 AM, Sivan Toledo via USRP-users wrote: > OK, tried it and I clearly need to call the "make" functions, otherwise > the code segfaults. Yes, UHD won't allocate memory implicitly in the C-API. -- M > > On Sat, Jul 15, 2017 at 7:02 PM, Sivan Toledo > w

Re: [USRP-users] Unable to load windows driver for USRP B205i mini

2017-07-17 Thread Marcus D. Leech via USRP-users
On 07/17/2017 04:12 PM, Nirmala Soundararajan via USRP-users wrote: Hi, Can anyone please help on how to load the windows driver for USRP B205i mini. Its a USB 3.0 device regards Nirmala ___ USRP-users mailing list USRP-users@lists.ettus.com http

[USRP-users] Unable to load windows driver for USRP B205i mini

2017-07-17 Thread Nirmala Soundararajan via USRP-users
Hi, Can anyone please help on how to load the windows driver for USRP B205i mini. Its a USB 3.0 device regards Nirmala ___ USRP-users mailing list USRP-users@lists.ettus.com http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com

[USRP-users] problem with RFNoC probing

2017-07-17 Thread Jason Matusiak via USRP-users
I am not sure what is going on, but while working on my new RFNoC block, I can't probe my X310 anymore. When I do, I get this error: [INFO] [CORES] Performing timer loopback test... [ERROR] [UHD] Exception caught in safe-call. in virtual ctrl_iface_impl::~ctrl_iface_impl() at /home/jmat/rfn

Re: [USRP-users] issue with rfnoc fft size

2017-07-17 Thread Marcus D. Leech via USRP-users
You'll need to make certain that the MTU on your network card supports the required frame sizes for your FFT. On 1GiGe, you're unlikely to be able to support greater than 1024-bin FFTs, since most cards won't do jumbo frames larger than 9000 bytes. On 2017-07-17 11:38, Sanjoy Basak via USRP-use

Re: [USRP-users] issue with rfnoc fft size

2017-07-17 Thread Jonathon Pendlum via USRP-users
Hi, Your Ethernet packet size has to be large enough to fit the entire FFT output in a single packet. Try setting your MTU to 9000. Jonathon On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 8:38 AM, Sanjoy Basak via USRP-users < usrp-users@lists.ettus.com> wrote: > Hello experts, > I am trying to use RFNoc fft examples

[USRP-users] issue with rfnoc fft size

2017-07-17 Thread Sanjoy Basak via USRP-users
Hello experts, I am trying to use RFNoc fft examples (rfnoc_fft.grc). I started with the gr-ettus examples. However, I am having some problems with the fft size. In the grc block, I find the option to choose 4096 fft size. However, with hardware I could only work fft size 128 and 256. If I use 512/

[USRP-users] watch dog timer

2017-07-17 Thread deepa kumar via USRP-users
Hi , Can I have more details on watch dog timer availaibility in E310 usrp. Thanks DeepaKumar ___ USRP-users mailing list USRP-users@lists.ettus.com http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com

Re: [USRP-users] Removing the whole LO signal when transmitting

2017-07-17 Thread Derek Kozel via USRP-users
Hello Brais, The gain values for USRPs are indexed from 0 dB gain being minimum gain up to the device's maximum. Usually this means that 0 dB of gain is actually a large amount of attenuation or loss through the RX chain. The same is true for TX. It doesn't surprise me that you are seeing those va

Re: [USRP-users] Removing the whole LO signal when transmitting

2017-07-17 Thread Brais Ares via USRP-users
Ok, I understand! Also I have to configure a rx_gain of 60 dB, and a tx_gain of 10 dB If I want to reconstruct the transmitted signal to the very same power level I received it. The scheme would be: ~~~ signal_generator (QPSK at -60 dBm) -> cable(0.3 dB attenuation) -> rx_usrp -> tx_usrp -> cable