Re: [USRP-users] systemverilog files in rfnoc block

2017-08-25 Thread Dario Pennisi via USRP-users
i think i found the issue... tcl script file usrp3/tools/scripts/viv_utils.tcl actually contains instructions to add files to project based on their extensions and .sv is not listed so files are skipped. adding a case for .sv works but it also includes axi_crossbar_intf.sv which seems to be a

[USRP-users] systemverilog files in rfnoc block

2017-08-25 Thread Dario Pennisi via USRP-users
hi, i am trying to include a couple of systemverilog files in the list of sources for a custom rfnoc block. if i do that i can see in the log that all files with .sv extension are ignored and of course their modules are not found. if i launch compilation in gui mode and then add files back it

Re: [USRP-users] Receiver not reporting any data

2017-08-25 Thread Jacob Knoles via USRP-users
That makes sense then. Thanks! - Jacob Knoles On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 10:03 AM, wrote: > An LO offset tunes the analog hardware to desired_freq+LO_offset, and then > digitally basebands the desired frequency. However, if the analog > bandwidth

Re: [USRP-users] Receiver not reporting any data

2017-08-25 Thread Marcus D. Leech via USRP-users
An LO offset tunes the analog hardware to desired_freq+LO_offset, and then digitally basebands the desired frequency. However, if the analog bandwidth is narrow enough that the digital basebanding (DDC) doesn't have any useful signal, then this will be the result. On 2017-08-25 12:47, Jacob

Re: [USRP-users] Receiver not reporting any data

2017-08-25 Thread Jacob Knoles via USRP-users
Thanks. I didn't expect the actual input to shift with the LO offset. - Jacob Knoles On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 9:08 AM, wrote: > That's probably because you set your bandwidth to be somewhat narrow, so > with offset tuning, you were only seeing

Re: [USRP-users] Receiver not reporting any data

2017-08-25 Thread Marcus D. Leech via USRP-users
That's probably because you set your bandwidth to be somewhat narrow, so with offset tuning, you were only seeing the deeply-filtered data. On 2017-08-25 11:23, Jacob Knoles wrote: > I found my issue. When I set my center frequency to monitor I also provided a > LO offset. The intention is to

[USRP-users] Multiple X310 (NI-2943R) configuration issues

2017-08-25 Thread Jens Abraham via USRP-users
Hello everyone, we have a couple of X310 connected via PCIe to a Windows host and I’m trying to get a slightly more elaborate multi USRP example up and running to dump IQ data from multiple radio chains. Somehow stuff seems to work alright for a single radio with two RX chains at 10 MSamples/s

Re: [USRP-users] How to connect single USRP N200 with two PCs?

2017-08-25 Thread Kyeong Su Shin via USRP-users
To whom it may concern: First, I am not an expert of USRP, so I could be wrong. A few thoughts: 1. A USRP N200 does have two DACs / ADCs, but they are typically used for the I-Q sampling, so whether you can get two RX channels from a USRP N200 depends on the installed daughterboards. (Well, you

Re: [USRP-users] How to connect single USRP N200 with two PCs?

2017-08-25 Thread Muhammad Munir via USRP-users
Dear Claudio, Thanks for the reply. I connected a single USRP with two PCs and tried to access USRP using two different host PCs. When a USRP is engaged with one host, the other can not get access to USRP. It means, we can access USRP by a single host at a time. The problem with the solution you

Re: [USRP-users] How to connect single USRP N200 with two PCs?

2017-08-25 Thread Claudio Cicconetti via USRP-users
Dear Muhammad, 1. Yes, it is possible to connect an N200 to a switch, then you can use any PC connected to that as the host for the USRP device. Just make sure the switch is GbE (1000 Mb/s), not Fast Ethernet (10/100 Mb/s). Note that this approach has been discouraged by Ettus in the past for a