Re: [USRP-users] Sampler clock common or not?

2018-09-15 Thread Koyel Das (Vehere) via USRP-users
Ok will check and get back. Regards, Koyel From: Marcus D. Leech Sent: Sunday, September 16, 2018 9:28:55 AM To: Koyel Das (Vehere); 'USRP-users@lists.ettus.com' Subject: Re: [USRP-users] Sampler clock common or not? On 09/15/2018 11:54 PM, Koyel Das (Vehere)

Re: [USRP-users] Sampler clock common or not?

2018-09-15 Thread Marcus D. Leech via USRP-users
On 09/15/2018 11:54 PM, Koyel Das (Vehere) wrote: I just forwarded in another thread the processing I am doing. Have you received it? Regards, Koyel Yes, but I'd rather not have to analyse your MATLAB code in detail. You can use the --phase-relations option on the uhd_fft utility for

Re: [USRP-users] Fw: the steps of processing I am doing

2018-09-15 Thread Koyel Das (Vehere) via USRP-users
Yeah my supervisor also suggested to use a splitter. I will do that. Thanks. Regards, Koyel From: Marcus D. Leech Sent: Sunday, September 16, 2018 9:25:48 AM To: Koyel Das (Vehere); 'USRP-users@lists.ettus.com' Subject: Re: Fw: the steps of processing I am doing

Re: [USRP-users] Sampler clock common or not?

2018-09-15 Thread Koyel Das (Vehere) via USRP-users
I just forwarded in another thread the processing I am doing. Have you received it? Regards, Koyel From: Marcus D. Leech Sent: Sunday, September 16, 2018 9:05:29 AM To: Koyel Das (Vehere); 'USRP-users@lists.ettus.com' Subject: Re: [USRP-users] Sampler clock

[USRP-users] Fw: the steps of processing I am doing

2018-09-15 Thread Koyel Das (Vehere) via USRP-users
I am forwarding the processing steps of matlab. I checked with my phd supervisor from MPIFR . He is also surprised to see the results. I also did phd in radio astronomy instrumentation. Please go through the steps of post processing once. My supervisor didn’t find anything wrong so we are

Re: [USRP-users] Sampler clock common or not?

2018-09-15 Thread Marcus D. Leech via USRP-users
On 09/15/2018 11:32 PM, Koyel Das (Vehere) wrote: I don’t have access to the flowgraph currently but it’s the same flowgraph I sent earlier in my other previous email for 2955 R. I have UHD with two channels, each channel connected to a file sink. One channel is set to TX/RX, another to RX2. I

Re: [USRP-users] Sampler clock common or not?

2018-09-15 Thread Koyel Das (Vehere) via USRP-users
I don’t have access to the flowgraph currently but it’s the same flowgraph I sent earlier in my other previous email for 2955 R. I have UHD with two channels, each channel connected to a file sink. One channel is set to TX/RX, another to RX2. I am sampling at 1 msps. I am capturing data from

Re: [USRP-users] Sampler clock common or not?

2018-09-15 Thread Marcus D. Leech via USRP-users
On 09/15/2018 10:38 PM, Koyel Das (Vehere) wrote: Hi, Thanks for the information. Do I have to set any property in the gnu radio uhd to phase lock the two oscillators to on board clock or they are by default locked to it? Nothing special to do. It happens automatically. Can the external

Re: [USRP-users] Sampler clock common or not?

2018-09-15 Thread Koyel Das (Vehere) via USRP-users
Hi, Thanks for the information. Do I have to set any property in the gnu radio uhd to phase lock the two oscillators to on board clock or they are by default locked to it? Can the external reference be gps? What settings need to be done in UHD to sync the two oscillators to gps? Actually I

Re: [USRP-users] Sampler clock common or not?

2018-09-15 Thread Marcus D. Leech via USRP-users
On 09/15/2018 01:35 AM, Koyel Das (Vehere) via USRP-users wrote: Hi, I am using USRP 2954R. I have connected one antenna to RX2 of RF0 and another antenna to TX/RX of RF1. Both are used for receiving. Can someone tell me if RX2 of RF0 and TX/RX of RF1 are phase locked that is the signal

[USRP-users] [UHD] Announcing 3.13.0.3 Release Candidate 1

2018-09-15 Thread Michael West via USRP-users
The release candidate of UHD version 3.13.0.3 has been tagged and is available for testing. This is a patch release for the UHD-3.13 branch, mainly affecting N3xx, X3xx, and B2xx devices. This release is API and ABI compatible with 3.13.0.2. The tag for this release: