Re: [USRP-users] N310 with rfnoc-devel branch

2018-07-23 Thread Rob Kossler via USRP-users
Thanks for the explanation. That make sense. I suppose that I also could have just pulled and recompiled MPM directly on the N310 (in lieu of re-flashing the SD externally or using mender). Rob On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 12:55 PM Martin Braun wrote: > On 07/23/2018 06:57 AM, Rob Kossler wrote:

Re: [USRP-users] N310 with rfnoc-devel branch

2018-07-23 Thread Martin Braun via USRP-users
On 07/23/2018 06:57 AM, Rob Kossler wrote: > Martin, > Re-flashing the SD card with the 3.12 image fixed my issue! Rob, that's great news, and I'm happy you're unstuck! I'm still not entirely sure what the exact reason is for this is, but here's a short analysis: On the N310, we use an

Re: [USRP-users] N310 with rfnoc-devel branch

2018-07-23 Thread Rob Kossler via USRP-users
Martin, Re-flashing the SD card with the 3.12 image fixed my issue! Rob On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 6:13 PM Rob Kossler wrote: > I think 3.11, but how do I check? > I'm not sure if I mentioned or not, but I am running benchmark_rate from a > host, not embedded. > > Rob > > On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at

Re: [USRP-users] N310 with rfnoc-devel branch

2018-07-19 Thread Rob Kossler via USRP-users
I think 3.11, but how do I check? I'm not sure if I mentioned or not, but I am running benchmark_rate from a host, not embedded. Rob On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 6:03 PM Martin Braun wrote: > On 07/19/2018 02:50 PM, Rob Kossler wrote: > > Oops, I meant to say in the last email that I had confirmed

Re: [USRP-users] N310 with rfnoc-devel branch

2018-07-19 Thread Martin Braun via USRP-users
On 07/19/2018 02:50 PM, Rob Kossler wrote: > Oops, I meant to say in the last email that I had confirmed the other > fixes - sorry about my misleading remark. Actually, it was a misunderstanding on my part. Glad it works for you! > > Yes, I tried with externally supplied PPS and configured with

Re: [USRP-users] N310 with rfnoc-devel branch

2018-07-19 Thread Rob Kossler via USRP-users
Oops, I meant to say in the last email that I had confirmed the other fixes - sorry about my misleading remark. Yes, I tried with externally supplied PPS and configured with time_source arg setting. Same result as with internal PPS. Rob On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 5:46 PM Martin Braun wrote: > On

Re: [USRP-users] N310 with rfnoc-devel branch

2018-07-19 Thread Martin Braun via USRP-users
On 07/19/2018 11:45 AM, Rob Kossler wrote: > Hi Martin, > I wanted to confirm that the recent fixes mentioned for some of the N310 > issues I mentioned are indeed working well for me. These include > - Tx power output levels > - get_usrp_rx_info(), get_usrp_tx_info() Yes, these are fixed... >

Re: [USRP-users] N310 with rfnoc-devel branch

2018-07-19 Thread Rob Kossler via USRP-users
Hi Martin, I wanted to confirm that the recent fixes mentioned for some of the N310 issues I mentioned are indeed working well for me. These include - Tx power output levels - get_usrp_rx_info(), get_usrp_tx_info() However, I am still stuck on this "No PPS Detected" error which occurs in the

Re: [USRP-users] N310 with rfnoc-devel branch

2018-07-18 Thread Rob Kossler via USRP-users
I just tried a separate computer and pulled the latest from Master (w/o using -DENABLE_RFNOC=ON during cmake). Then I ran images_downloader and image_loader and rebooted N310. Same bad result as indicated previously (see 1st result below). Then, without changing anything, I used a 3.11 version

Re: [USRP-users] N310 with rfnoc-devel branch

2018-07-17 Thread Martin Braun via USRP-users
On 06/27/2018 11:31 AM, Rob Kossler via USRP-users wrote: > Hi, > I am getting some unexpected behavior from my N310 using the example > 'tx_waveforms' utility and stock FPGA image using 'rfnoc-devel'.  If I > simply switch to 'maint', things behave as expected.  Here are the issues... > > 1.

[USRP-users] N310 with rfnoc-devel branch

2018-06-27 Thread Rob Kossler via USRP-users
Hi, I am getting some unexpected behavior from my N310 using the example 'tx_waveforms' utility and stock FPGA image using 'rfnoc-devel'. If I simply switch to 'maint', things behave as expected. Here are the issues... 1. With 'rfnoc-devel', it is necessary for me to specify a subdev spec