On 09/05/2018 11:19 AM, Martin Braun via USRP-users wrote:
If I may add some comments: We *do* have converters from sc12 to sc16,
so I'm not sure what's up with that. If you have a modern computer, 56
Msps isn't considered a massive amount (GNU Radio, for example, should
have no issues chomping
On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 11:01:18AM -0400, Marcus D. Leech wrote:
> I also tried benchmark_rate. In random mode, I have no overflow in sc8,
> but in sc16 I have lots of overflows and error messages. Without the
> random mode, I can go up to 36MS/s in sc16, and 56MS/s in sc12! So for
On 09/05/2018 07:06 AM, RizThon wrote:
Thanks again Marcus,
Just to be clear, when you say I can stream at 56MS/s on a single
channel, is it in sc16, sc12 or sc8?
Over USB3, it shouldn't matter, except that in reality, on an actual
computer, with an actual controller, and actual operating
Thanks again Marcus,
Just to be clear, when you say I can stream at 56MS/s on a single channel,
is it in sc16, sc12 or sc8?
I tried on a different machine, with i7-8550U and 8 or 16GB of RAM.
On Windows, I'm getting the same as before, ie lots of overflows, with
rx_samples_to_file.exe.
On
On 09/03/2018 07:50 PM, Marcus D. Leech via USRP-users wrote:
> On 09/03/2018 12:15 AM, Marcus D. Leech via USRP-users wrote:
>> On 09/03/2018 12:11 AM, RizThon wrote:
>>> Thanks, I'll try to run it on some intel hardware ("Ettus Research
>>> recommends using the Intel Series 7, 8, and 9 USB
On 09/03/2018 12:11 AM, RizThon wrote:
Thanks, I'll try to run it on some intel hardware ("Ettus Research
recommends using the Intel Series 7, 8, and 9 USB controllers.") as
well as on Linux.
Concerning my question on SC12, namely which UHD version can I use,
does anyone know?
SC12, SC16,
Thanks, I'll try to run it on some intel hardware ("Ettus Research
recommends using the Intel Series 7, 8, and 9 USB controllers.") as well as
on Linux.
Concerning my question on SC12, namely which UHD version can I use, does
anyone know?
On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 10:51 AM Marcus D. Leech via
On 08/26/2018 10:19 PM, RizThon via USRP-users wrote:
Hi all,
I'm still trying to reach 56MS/s on a B210 without (too many)
overflows. I was told that sc12 used to work with the B210 but broke
at some point.
Can someone confirm and tell me what version I should try?
On Windows, with all
Hi all,
I'm still trying to reach 56MS/s on a B210 without (too many) overflows. I
was told that sc12 used to work with the B210 but broke at some point.
Can someone confirm and tell me what version I should try?
On Windows, with all versions of 3.10.0.0, I get an error, whether I use
sc12 or
