HelloEarlier I already wrote about big times for the example of
twinrx_freq_hopping
http://lists.ettus.com/pipermail/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com/2018-February/027782.htmlCan
anyone analyze the source code(rx_samples_c in the attachment) and say why it
turns out such a strange result (TestTwinRX)
Hello
I duplicated the attachment with the source code.Derek can you see what's
wrong.I
can understand what the maximum speed of perestroika I can get with TwinRX.
Thank you
___
USRP-users mailing list
USRP-users@lists.ettus.com
Hello,
Setting the LO source does not tune the synthesizers so the actual command
duration should be very short. How are you measuring the durations?
I looked at why the twinrx_freq_hopping demo is not built by default on
Windows and it is because of an optional feature which requires a library
Hello
In the previous post(twinrx_freq_hopping example), I wrote that I could not get
time in 5 ms for example twinrx_freq_hopping.I measure the commands execute time
in the recieve loop and found with surprise that the set_rx_lo_source function
for the first time worked 0 ms and the next time
