>
> 1) When each B210 syncs, the 1PPS pulse between each USRP would be aligned to
> +-50 nsec. Since they're only separated by a few km, I suspect the alignment
> might be better because of common errors (Ionosphere, orbits, clocks, etc) in
> the GPS solution
I think you will find that
Hi,
> As a backup, since the B210 has 2 RX chains, I can do my application with RX1
> and record GPS L1 signals on RX2, then post-process the GPS data to solve for
> clock offset.
It has 2 RX chains with a single LO, you need to receive the _same_
frequency. (at least within the same RF
Each B210 will have a GPSDO, they'll be separated by a few kilometers. My
understanding is as follows:
1) When each B210 syncs, the 1PPS pulse between each USRP would be aligned
to +-50 nsec. Since they're only separated by a few km, I suspect the
alignment might be better because of common
On 10/09/2018 01:24 PM, Marcus Müller via USRP-users wrote:
Works!
Don't forget that PPS accuracy of a GPS receiver is theoretical best-
case some 50 ns; in reality, things can get a little worse than that.
Best regards,
Marcus
It wasn't clear to me whether that was a *single* GPSDO whose
Works!
Don't forget that PPS accuracy of a GPS receiver is theoretical best-
case some 50 ns; in reality, things can get a little worse than that.
Best regards,
Marcus
On Tue, 2018-10-09 at 09:32 +0200, Stephan Esterhuizen via USRP-users
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I'm looking at using multiple
Hi All,
I'm looking at using multiple B210s synchronized with GPSDO distributed
over a few kilometers. The idea is to measure time-of-arrival of a signal
source. I understand the limitations of the GPSDO 1pps & 10 MHz reference
frequency/time stability.
What I'm curious about is whether anybody
