On 02/16/2018 06:55 AM, Dominik Eyerly via USRP-users wrote:
Hi Marcus,
Yes, I'm measuring the isolation with both ports terminated. Modifying
the board so that switching is no longer available is not really an
option for us. Especially since it voids the warranty. Any chance of
using a bett
Hi Marcus,
Yes, I'm measuring the isolation with both ports terminated. Modifying
the board so that switching is no longer available is not really an
option for us. Especially since it voids the warranty. Any chance of
using a better performing switch in future revs? This one has an
isolation min
What would the equivalent of this be for the e310?
On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 16:23 Marcus D. Leech via USRP-users <
usrp-users@lists.ettus.com> wrote:
> On 02/13/2018 03:30 AM, Dominik Eyerly via USRP-users wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I've noticed that the isolation between the Tx/Rx and the Rx2 port is
On 02/13/2018 03:30 AM, Dominik Eyerly via USRP-users wrote:
Hello,
I've noticed that the isolation between the Tx/Rx and the Rx2 port is
quite poor at the upper frequencies ~22dB at 5.9GHz. Could you explain
if this is to be expected? Would it be possible to know which switch
you are using?
Hello,
I've noticed that the isolation between the Tx/Rx and the Rx2 port is
quite poor at the upper frequencies ~22dB at 5.9GHz. Could you explain
if this is to be expected? Would it be possible to know which switch you
are using? Any way to improve the isolation?
cheers,
Dominik
--
--
i
