Matis,
you also need to keep in mind that via USB, we can only receive a
certain amount of samples at a time, and it's not a factor of 16384.
-- M
On 06/08/2018 04:18 PM, Marcus Müller via USRP-users wrote:
> Hi Matis,
>
> the time stamp of the first buffer after a disruption should indeed be
Hi Matis,
the time stamp of the first buffer after a disruption should indeed be
accurate, and describe the time at the first sample in that packet.
So, I'd say that, yes, you can use that to know how much you've lost.
Thus, let me ask you why you came to the conclusion that it is false?
Best
Hi,
I remark that the "time_spec" passed to the "recv" method of an rx_streamer is
not in
exact relation
with the length of the received vectors. For example, when receiving buffers of
length
16384 at Fs=362319 Hz,
the buffer length should be equal to (16384+1)/362319=0.0452225 seconds, while
