Re: [USRP-users] "Additional signa"l after a packet transmission

2018-02-22 Thread NAVES Raphael via USRP-users
Hi Marcus, I have many USRPs N210 with different daughterboards. I tried with both SBXv3 and WBXv3 daughterboards and the result is the same : the spikes appear. The only difference is the spikes amplitude but it's not suprising because I noticed that with the same transmission paramaretes

Re: [USRP-users] "Additional signa"l after a packet transmission

2018-02-22 Thread Marcus Müller via USRP-users
Hi Raphael, don't think switching from GNU Radio to directly talking to UHD will change much – the GNU Radio USRP Sink is pretty much a thin wrapper around UHD. You might have already said that, but I can't find in this email chain: What's the daughterboards you're using in your TX USRP N210?

Re: [USRP-users] "Additional signa"l after a packet transmission

2018-02-22 Thread NAVES Raphael via USRP-users
Hi Marcus, I'm only sending bursts of "null packets". I send them every 400 ms and I notice at the receiver side that the spikes happen exactly at the beginning of EACH transmission of null packets (for this verification I use GPS clock on the the transmitter and the reveiver). It's like if

Re: [USRP-users] "Additional signa"l after a packet transmission

2018-02-21 Thread Marcus Müller via USRP-users
Dear Raphael, > Don't you think that 40-60ms is a bit long fot the amplifier to shut down I didn't say it was the amplifier shutting down. I supposed it was the DC offset cancellation! Your recording is very interesting. I assume the "spike" you see happens exactly when you turn on the

Re: [USRP-users] "Additional signa"l after a packet transmission

2018-02-19 Thread NAVES Raphael via USRP-users
Hi Marcus, Thanks for your help. Don't you think that 40-60ms is a bit long fot the amplifier to shut down ? I tried to increase the gain at the receiver and the sender sides but I still have the problem. More important, I tried an other scenario by sending a burst of symbols whose value is

Re: [USRP-users] "Additional signa"l after a packet transmission

2018-02-12 Thread Marcus Müller via USRP-users
Hi! This might really be the fact that the amplifier takes some time to shut down. This, paired with the possibility of TX/RX crosstalk might be a contributing factor: That might actually change the DC offset on the receiving side, and trigger the step response of the DC offset cancellation

Re: [USRP-users] "Additional signa"l after a packet transmission

2018-02-10 Thread Marcus Müller via USRP-users
Hi Raphaël, not quite sure I get your problem, but this is rather hard to debug without knowing exactly what your transmitter does. For example, if you transmit something that isn't zero-mean, then the DC offset cancellation *in* the receiving end would start to cancel out. As that cancellation

Re: [USRP-users] "Additional signa"l after a packet transmission

2018-02-09 Thread NAVES Raphael via USRP-users
Hello, For more details, please find attached the received signal in the time domain. Clearly after the end of the packet, the signal takes a certain time to come back to "the ambient noise". If I zoom, I notice there is still some noise 40ms after the packet. It can disturb the reception of

Re: [USRP-users] "Additional signa"l after a packet transmission

2018-02-08 Thread NAVES Raphael via USRP-users
Hello Dan, Thanks for your answer. I'm using for transmitting the traditional USRP sink block provided by Gnuradio Companion. Each packet coming to this block is tagged with its length at the first sample. For the receiving part, I'm using the USRP source block. Both are used with basic