Re: [Uta] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-uta-smtp-tlsrpt-17

A reasonable perspective. Could that be added to the document? Yours, Joel On 3/8/18 6:33 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: On Mar 8, 2018, at 5:28 PM, Joel Halpern wrote: It is surprising in Section 3 Bullet 4 that reporting via email requires that the report

Re: [Uta] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-uta-smtp-tlsrpt-17

> On Mar 8, 2018, at 5:28 PM, Joel Halpern wrote: > >It is surprising in Section 3 Bullet 4 that reporting via email requires >that the report submitted use DKIM. Particularly while ignoring any >security errors in communicating with the recipient domain.

[Uta] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-uta-smtp-tlsrpt-17

Reviewer: Joel Halpern Review result: Almost Ready I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more

[Uta] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-uta-smtp-tlsrpt-17

Reviewer: Phillip Hallam-Baker Review result: Has Issues I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document