Hiya,
On 25/01/2019 22:11, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> Like John, I am very skeptical about the applicability of ESNI to
> SMTP.
I also agree with John and you that ESNI doesn't seem compelling
for SMTP. Nonetheless, I'm often wrong, and maybe in this case too,
so if ESNI is seen to be used then
> On Jan 25, 2019, at 4:38 PM, Stephen Farrell
> wrote:
>
> 2. The new text in s4 is wrong, a mail server will generally
> have access to the value from ESNI or the h/s will likely fail,
> and the TLS server will treat that as the SNI to use for server
> certificate selection. The issue isn't
Hiya,
On 25/01/2019 18:08, John R Levine wrote:
> I've uploaded a new version that reflects the recent discussions.
>
> Because I am a grumpy old guy I will not tell you what it says so if you
> want to know, you will have to read all four pages of it:
Sorry to have made you (more:-) grumpy,
