Re: [Uta] Warren Kumari's Discuss on draft-ietf-uta-smtp-tlsrpt-18: (with DISCUSS)

Confirmed, and updated the doc with the RFC reference. On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 11:39 AM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: > > > > On Apr 16, 2018, at 2:24 PM, Warren Kumari wrote: > > > >> Strings in TXT records have a single-octet length field. When returning

Re: [Uta] Warren Kumari's Discuss on draft-ietf-uta-smtp-tlsrpt-18: (with DISCUSS)

> On Apr 16, 2018, at 2:24 PM, Warren Kumari wrote: > >> Strings in TXT records have a single-octet length field. When returning a >> longer >> string, or when one wants to explicitly segment a TXT RDATA into multiple >> strings >> one returns: >> >>txt.example.

Re: [Uta] Warren Kumari's Discuss on draft-ietf-uta-smtp-tlsrpt-18: (with DISCUSS)

On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 2:08 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: > > >> On Apr 16, 2018, at 1:58 PM, Warren Kumari wrote: >> >> I throw away the one that contains 'bar', fair enough, got it. What I don't >> understand is what a record would look like which is a

Re: [Uta] Warren Kumari's Discuss on draft-ietf-uta-smtp-tlsrpt-18: (with DISCUSS)

> On Apr 16, 2018, at 1:58 PM, Warren Kumari wrote: > > I throw away the one that contains 'bar', fair enough, got it. What I don't > understand is what a record would look like which is a single record (#2), but > that contains multiple strings (#3). Can you provide an