> On 27 Jan 2022, at 4:45 pm, Yaron Sheffer wrote:
>
> So our plan moving forward is to essentially keep the new text on OCSP [1]
> and add a reference to RFC 7633 (the certificate must-staple extension). But
> only as a MAY. In addition, we will add a MUST requirement to perform (some
> kind
Thank you all for the lively and far reaching discussion on revocation and
OCSP. Let me summarize how the authors of RFC7525-bis read the consensus - UTA
WG chairs, please chime in if you disagree.
There seems to be consensus that applications should be able to handle
certificate revocation.