Re: [Uta] WGLC for draft-ietf-uta-rfc6125bis-06

2022-06-30 Thread Martin Thomson
On Fri, Jul 1, 2022, at 03:17, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: >> I believe this document could just point to the HTTP RFC as advise for >> protocols that support IP addresses, as I have also said. > > That might work. I could live with that if there is pushback on a more complete change. That said, I

Re: [Uta] WGLC for draft-ietf-uta-rfc6125bis-06

2022-06-30 Thread Peter Saint-Andre
On 6/30/22 8:18 AM, Salz, Rich wrote: A reference identity of type IP-ID matches if the address is identical to an iPAddress value of the subjectAltName extension of the certificate. My concern about this is what I stated before. This document, and its predecessor,

[Uta] I-D Action: draft-ietf-uta-rfc7525bis-09.txt

2022-06-30 Thread internet-drafts
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Using TLS in Applications WG of the IETF. Title : Recommendations for Secure Use of Transport Layer Security (TLS) and Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS)

Re: [Uta] WGLC for draft-ietf-uta-rfc6125bis-06

2022-06-30 Thread Salz, Rich
> A reference identity of type IP-ID matches if the address is identical to an iPAddress value of the subjectAltName extension of the certificate. My concern about this is what I stated before. This document, and its predecessor, clearly state that they are about domain