> Thanks! Yes, if the issue is to be settled, rfc6125bis is not the best
battle ground.
Nicely put, thanks.
___
Uta mailing list
Uta@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
On Sun, Mar 26, 2023 at 04:34:15PM -0700, Rob Sayre wrote:
> I think I will not raise any objection to draft-ietf-uta-rfc6125bis. I
> might write a different draft that says "all of the IETF IDNA documents are
> misleading, the internet runs on UTS-46", but that is not specific to this
> draft.
Hi all,
I think I will not raise any objection to draft-ietf-uta-rfc6125bis. I
might write a different draft that says "all of the IETF IDNA documents are
misleading, the internet runs on UTS-46", but that is not specific to this
draft.
You can inspect the problem here:
