Sounds good, thanks!
Ben.
> On Feb 26, 2019, at 1:59 PM, Jim Fenton wrote:
>
> On 2/21/19 7:50 PM, Ben Campbell wrote:
>> --
>> COMMENT:
>> -
Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-uta-mta-sts-17: Yes
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer to https
Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-uta-smtp-tlsrpt-18: Yes
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer to https
Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-uta-smtp-tlsrpt-18: Discuss
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer to https
> On Oct 26, 2017, at 5:44 PM, Chris Newman wrote:
>
>> My inclination is to remove the "client has determined that the certificate
>> can be safely used" clause, but I'd like to see what Chris suggests here.
>
> Here's an attempt to reword without using the term
> On Oct 25, 2017, at 5:48 AM, Keith Moore wrote:
>
[…]
>
>> -4.1, last paragraph: "It is RECOMMENDED that new users be required to use
>> TLS
>> version 1.1
>>or greater from the start."
>> Is 1.1 correct? Why not start with 1.2?
>
> TLS 1.1 was a
Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-uta-email-deep-09: Yes
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer to https