Thanks for the review!
* - I think QUIC should be mentioned already in section 1.1 and mentioned
everytime DTLS is mentioned
I made some changes so that things are more “equal” at
https://github.com/richsalz/draft-ietf-uta-rfc6125bis/pull/48 Please take a
look.
* - The document
eviation). Maybe one of them is enough.
Cheers,
John
From: Uta on behalf of Salz, Rich
Date: Thursday, 26 May 2022 at 16:16
To: uta@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Uta] I-D Action: draft-ietf-uta-rfc6125bis-06.txt
Colleagues,
With this draft we (the authors) think the document is done. We received
Colleagues,
With this draft we (the authors) think the document is done. We received a lot
of excellent feedback and comments, and incorporated pretty much all of it. We
believe this document is ready for WGLC, and ask the chairs to do that.
Depending on what happens during the WGLC, we'll
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Using TLS in Applications WG of the IETF.
Title : Service Names in TLS
Authors : Peter Saint-Andre
Jeff Hodges
